Cargando…

Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion

BACKGROUND: Nurses, medical technologists, nuclear medicine technologists, pre-hospital providers, and medical students are a few groups of healthcare learners asked to learn intravenous (IV) cannulation in their training (J Surg Educ. 69:536–43, 2012). Despite the fact that IV cannulation has been...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buckley, Lisa A., Gilbert, Gregory E., Bauman, Eric B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0092-y
_version_ 1783412153602015232
author Buckley, Lisa A.
Gilbert, Gregory E.
Bauman, Eric B.
author_facet Buckley, Lisa A.
Gilbert, Gregory E.
Bauman, Eric B.
author_sort Buckley, Lisa A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nurses, medical technologists, nuclear medicine technologists, pre-hospital providers, and medical students are a few groups of healthcare learners asked to learn intravenous (IV) cannulation in their training (J Surg Educ. 69:536–43, 2012). Despite the fact that IV cannulation has been taught to several health professions, it is difficult to find a psychometrically validated checklist to guide teaching this skill in the simulated procedural training (Pediatrics 124: 610-9, 2009, J Assoc Vasc Access 21: 196-204, 2016). In the absence of a pragmatic, valid checklist for the initial teaching of peripheral IV skills in the simulation procedural skills lab, this investigation sought to describe the process and create a psychometrically valid checklist. METHODS: Expert raters used Lawshe’s method for identifying valid items from the universe of items for IV insertion. Gwet’s AC(2) and generalizability (G) theory was used assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: The literature and in-house IV checklists were examined for steps to inserting a peripheral IV, and the steps were compiled into a survey and sent to experts who rated each item. Of the 37 potential steps, 16 steps were identified as being psychometrically valid. The checklist content validity index was .82. Inter-rater reliability was .94 (95% CI .91–.98). Good inter-rater reliability was confirmed using generalizability theory. CONCLUSIONS: This study created and provided evidence of content validity and reliability for this checklist using Lawshe’s methodology. As such, this method of evaluating a checklist for validity and reliability evidence can be followed for other healthcare checklists. This checklist can be used for teaching IV placement in healthcare students in the simulation procedural training lab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-019-0092-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6471996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64719962019-04-24 Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion Buckley, Lisa A. Gilbert, Gregory E. Bauman, Eric B. Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Nurses, medical technologists, nuclear medicine technologists, pre-hospital providers, and medical students are a few groups of healthcare learners asked to learn intravenous (IV) cannulation in their training (J Surg Educ. 69:536–43, 2012). Despite the fact that IV cannulation has been taught to several health professions, it is difficult to find a psychometrically validated checklist to guide teaching this skill in the simulated procedural training (Pediatrics 124: 610-9, 2009, J Assoc Vasc Access 21: 196-204, 2016). In the absence of a pragmatic, valid checklist for the initial teaching of peripheral IV skills in the simulation procedural skills lab, this investigation sought to describe the process and create a psychometrically valid checklist. METHODS: Expert raters used Lawshe’s method for identifying valid items from the universe of items for IV insertion. Gwet’s AC(2) and generalizability (G) theory was used assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: The literature and in-house IV checklists were examined for steps to inserting a peripheral IV, and the steps were compiled into a survey and sent to experts who rated each item. Of the 37 potential steps, 16 steps were identified as being psychometrically valid. The checklist content validity index was .82. Inter-rater reliability was .94 (95% CI .91–.98). Good inter-rater reliability was confirmed using generalizability theory. CONCLUSIONS: This study created and provided evidence of content validity and reliability for this checklist using Lawshe’s methodology. As such, this method of evaluating a checklist for validity and reliability evidence can be followed for other healthcare checklists. This checklist can be used for teaching IV placement in healthcare students in the simulation procedural training lab. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-019-0092-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6471996/ /pubmed/31019738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0092-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Buckley, Lisa A.
Gilbert, Gregory E.
Bauman, Eric B.
Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
title Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
title_full Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
title_fullStr Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
title_short Psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
title_sort psychometric testing of a checklist for procedural training of peripheral intravenous insertion
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6471996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31019738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-019-0092-y
work_keys_str_mv AT buckleylisaa psychometrictestingofachecklistforproceduraltrainingofperipheralintravenousinsertion
AT gilbertgregorye psychometrictestingofachecklistforproceduraltrainingofperipheralintravenousinsertion
AT baumanericb psychometrictestingofachecklistforproceduraltrainingofperipheralintravenousinsertion