Cargando…

Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND: Due to its bone preserving philosophy, short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) has primarily been recommended for young and active patients. However, there may be benefits for elderly patients given a less invasive operative technique due to the short curved implant design. The purpose o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gkagkalis, Georgios, Goetti, Patrick, Mai, Sabine, Meinecke, Ingmar, Helmy, Näder, Bosson, Dominique, Kutzner, Karl Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1123-1
_version_ 1783412173710557184
author Gkagkalis, Georgios
Goetti, Patrick
Mai, Sabine
Meinecke, Ingmar
Helmy, Näder
Bosson, Dominique
Kutzner, Karl Philipp
author_facet Gkagkalis, Georgios
Goetti, Patrick
Mai, Sabine
Meinecke, Ingmar
Helmy, Näder
Bosson, Dominique
Kutzner, Karl Philipp
author_sort Gkagkalis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to its bone preserving philosophy, short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) has primarily been recommended for young and active patients. However, there may be benefits for elderly patients given a less invasive operative technique due to the short curved implant design. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes as well as perioperative complications of a calcar-guided short stem between a young (< 60 years) and a geriatric (> 75 years) population. METHODS: Data were collected in a total of 5 centers, and 400 short-stems were included as part of a prospective multicentre observational study between 2010 and 2014 with a mean follow-up of 49.2 months. Preoperative femur morphology was analysed using the Dorr classification. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed in both groups as well as perioperative complications, rates and reasons for stem revision. RESULTS: No differences were found for the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) values of rest pain, load pain, and satisfaction, whereas Harris Hip Score (HHS) was slightly better in the young group. Comparing both groups, none of the radiological parameters that were assessed (stress-shielding, cortical hypertrophy, radiolucency, osteolysis) reached differences of statistical significance. While in young patients aseptic loosening is the main cause of implant failure, in the elderly group particularly postoperative periprosthetic fractures due to accidental fall have to be considered to be of high risk. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures was found to be 0% in Dorr type A femurs, whereas in Dorr types B and C fractures occurred in 2.1 and 22.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age alone is not necessarily to be considered as contra-indications for calcar-guided short-stem THA, although further follow-up is needed. However, markedly reduced bone quality with femur morphology of Dorr type C seems to be associated with increased risk for postoperative periprosthetic fractures, thus indication should be limited to Dorr types A and B. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register; DRKS00012634, 07.07.2017 (retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6472082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64720822019-04-24 Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study Gkagkalis, Georgios Goetti, Patrick Mai, Sabine Meinecke, Ingmar Helmy, Näder Bosson, Dominique Kutzner, Karl Philipp BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to its bone preserving philosophy, short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) has primarily been recommended for young and active patients. However, there may be benefits for elderly patients given a less invasive operative technique due to the short curved implant design. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes as well as perioperative complications of a calcar-guided short stem between a young (< 60 years) and a geriatric (> 75 years) population. METHODS: Data were collected in a total of 5 centers, and 400 short-stems were included as part of a prospective multicentre observational study between 2010 and 2014 with a mean follow-up of 49.2 months. Preoperative femur morphology was analysed using the Dorr classification. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed in both groups as well as perioperative complications, rates and reasons for stem revision. RESULTS: No differences were found for the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) values of rest pain, load pain, and satisfaction, whereas Harris Hip Score (HHS) was slightly better in the young group. Comparing both groups, none of the radiological parameters that were assessed (stress-shielding, cortical hypertrophy, radiolucency, osteolysis) reached differences of statistical significance. While in young patients aseptic loosening is the main cause of implant failure, in the elderly group particularly postoperative periprosthetic fractures due to accidental fall have to be considered to be of high risk. The incidence of periprosthetic fractures was found to be 0% in Dorr type A femurs, whereas in Dorr types B and C fractures occurred in 2.1 and 22.2% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced age alone is not necessarily to be considered as contra-indications for calcar-guided short-stem THA, although further follow-up is needed. However, markedly reduced bone quality with femur morphology of Dorr type C seems to be associated with increased risk for postoperative periprosthetic fractures, thus indication should be limited to Dorr types A and B. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register; DRKS00012634, 07.07.2017 (retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6472082/ /pubmed/30995903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1123-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gkagkalis, Georgios
Goetti, Patrick
Mai, Sabine
Meinecke, Ingmar
Helmy, Näder
Bosson, Dominique
Kutzner, Karl Philipp
Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
title Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
title_full Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
title_fullStr Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
title_full_unstemmed Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
title_short Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
title_sort cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30995903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1123-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gkagkalisgeorgios cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy
AT goettipatrick cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy
AT maisabine cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy
AT meineckeingmar cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy
AT helmynader cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy
AT bossondominique cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy
AT kutznerkarlphilipp cementlessshortstemtotalhiparthroplastyintheelderlypatientisitasafeoptionaprospectivemulticentreobservationalstudy