Cargando…

Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, but no electrodiagnostic test alone shows sufficient sensitivity for CTS. We aimed to investigate the value of median motor terminal latency index (mTLI), median motor residual latency (mRL), and median-ulnar F-wave...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan, Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali, Tepeli, Betül
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007429
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_276_18
_version_ 1783412208546349056
author Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan
Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali
Tepeli, Betül
author_facet Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan
Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali
Tepeli, Betül
author_sort Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, but no electrodiagnostic test alone shows sufficient sensitivity for CTS. We aimed to investigate the value of median motor terminal latency index (mTLI), median motor residual latency (mRL), and median-ulnar F-wave latency difference (FdifMU) as additional tests to nerve conduction studies which are performed traditionally in electromyography laboratories. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. The results of electrodiagnostic studies performed on patients with CTS were examined. We divided the enrolled hands of the patients diagnosed with CTS into two groups: affected hands with abnormal electroneuromyographic parameters indicating CTS diagnosis (CTS group) and hands with normal electroneuromyographic parameters (control group). Then, we analyzed the results of these completed electrodiagnostic studies. RESULTS: A total of 320 hands of 160 patients were studied. FdifMU and mRL were found to be significantly higher in CTS group compared with the control group (P < 0.001). mTLIs were found to be significantly higher in control group compared with the CTS group (P < 0.001). Given that, the area under the curve is more than 70% for mTLI and mRL, but not for FdifMU. CONCLUSION: When combined with mMDL, both mTLI and mRL have excellent specificity for the diagnosis of mild and moderate CTS. However, the sensitivities for both parameters were lower. In suspected patients, FdifMU can be an additional tool for the diagnosis of CTS also, but alone it is not valuable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6472246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64722462019-04-19 Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali Tepeli, Betül Ann Indian Acad Neurol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy, but no electrodiagnostic test alone shows sufficient sensitivity for CTS. We aimed to investigate the value of median motor terminal latency index (mTLI), median motor residual latency (mRL), and median-ulnar F-wave latency difference (FdifMU) as additional tests to nerve conduction studies which are performed traditionally in electromyography laboratories. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. The results of electrodiagnostic studies performed on patients with CTS were examined. We divided the enrolled hands of the patients diagnosed with CTS into two groups: affected hands with abnormal electroneuromyographic parameters indicating CTS diagnosis (CTS group) and hands with normal electroneuromyographic parameters (control group). Then, we analyzed the results of these completed electrodiagnostic studies. RESULTS: A total of 320 hands of 160 patients were studied. FdifMU and mRL were found to be significantly higher in CTS group compared with the control group (P < 0.001). mTLIs were found to be significantly higher in control group compared with the CTS group (P < 0.001). Given that, the area under the curve is more than 70% for mTLI and mRL, but not for FdifMU. CONCLUSION: When combined with mMDL, both mTLI and mRL have excellent specificity for the diagnosis of mild and moderate CTS. However, the sensitivities for both parameters were lower. In suspected patients, FdifMU can be an additional tool for the diagnosis of CTS also, but alone it is not valuable. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6472246/ /pubmed/31007429 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_276_18 Text en Copyright: © 2006 - 2019 Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Uzunkulaoğlu, Aslıhan
Afsar, Sevgi Ikbali
Tepeli, Betül
Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_full Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_fullStr Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_short Terminal Latency Index, Residual Latency, and Median-Ulnar F-Wave Latency Difference in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
title_sort terminal latency index, residual latency, and median-ulnar f-wave latency difference in carpal tunnel syndrome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007429
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_276_18
work_keys_str_mv AT uzunkulaogluaslıhan terminallatencyindexresiduallatencyandmedianulnarfwavelatencydifferenceincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT afsarsevgiikbali terminallatencyindexresiduallatencyandmedianulnarfwavelatencydifferenceincarpaltunnelsyndrome
AT tepelibetul terminallatencyindexresiduallatencyandmedianulnarfwavelatencydifferenceincarpaltunnelsyndrome