Cargando…
Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review
The varied effects of recent extreme weather events around the world exemplify the uneven impacts of climate change on populations, even within relatively small geographic regions. Differential human vulnerability to environmental hazards results from a range of social, economic, historical, and pol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.565 |
_version_ | 1783412265271164928 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Kimberley Hardy, R. Dean Lazrus, Heather Mendez, Michael Orlove, Ben Rivera‐Collazo, Isabel Roberts, J. Timmons Rockman, Marcy Warner, Benjamin P. Winthrop, Robert |
author_facet | Thomas, Kimberley Hardy, R. Dean Lazrus, Heather Mendez, Michael Orlove, Ben Rivera‐Collazo, Isabel Roberts, J. Timmons Rockman, Marcy Warner, Benjamin P. Winthrop, Robert |
author_sort | Thomas, Kimberley |
collection | PubMed |
description | The varied effects of recent extreme weather events around the world exemplify the uneven impacts of climate change on populations, even within relatively small geographic regions. Differential human vulnerability to environmental hazards results from a range of social, economic, historical, and political factors, all of which operate at multiple scales. While adaptation to climate change has been the dominant focus of policy and research agendas, it is essential to ask as well why some communities and peoples are disproportionately exposed to and affected by climate threats. The cases and synthesis presented here are organized around four key themes (resource access, governance, culture, and knowledge), which we approach from four social science fields (cultural anthropology, archaeology, human geography, and sociology). Social scientific approaches to human vulnerability draw vital attention to the root causes of climate change threats and the reasons that people are forced to adapt to them. Because vulnerability is a multidimensional process rather than an unchanging state, a dynamic social approach to vulnerability is most likely to improve mitigation and adaptation planning efforts. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values‐Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation; |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6472565 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64725652019-04-19 Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review Thomas, Kimberley Hardy, R. Dean Lazrus, Heather Mendez, Michael Orlove, Ben Rivera‐Collazo, Isabel Roberts, J. Timmons Rockman, Marcy Warner, Benjamin P. Winthrop, Robert Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change Advanced Reviews The varied effects of recent extreme weather events around the world exemplify the uneven impacts of climate change on populations, even within relatively small geographic regions. Differential human vulnerability to environmental hazards results from a range of social, economic, historical, and political factors, all of which operate at multiple scales. While adaptation to climate change has been the dominant focus of policy and research agendas, it is essential to ask as well why some communities and peoples are disproportionately exposed to and affected by climate threats. The cases and synthesis presented here are organized around four key themes (resource access, governance, culture, and knowledge), which we approach from four social science fields (cultural anthropology, archaeology, human geography, and sociology). Social scientific approaches to human vulnerability draw vital attention to the root causes of climate change threats and the reasons that people are forced to adapt to them. Because vulnerability is a multidimensional process rather than an unchanging state, a dynamic social approach to vulnerability is most likely to improve mitigation and adaptation planning efforts. This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Values‐Based Approach to Vulnerability and Adaptation; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-12-07 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6472565/ /pubmed/31007726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.565 Text en © 2018 The Authors. WIREs Climate Change published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Advanced Reviews Thomas, Kimberley Hardy, R. Dean Lazrus, Heather Mendez, Michael Orlove, Ben Rivera‐Collazo, Isabel Roberts, J. Timmons Rockman, Marcy Warner, Benjamin P. Winthrop, Robert Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review |
title | Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review
|
title_full | Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review
|
title_fullStr | Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review
|
title_full_unstemmed | Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review
|
title_short | Explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: A social science review
|
title_sort | explaining differential vulnerability to climate change: a social science review |
topic | Advanced Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472565/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcc.565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomaskimberley explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT hardyrdean explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT lazrusheather explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT mendezmichael explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT orloveben explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT riveracollazoisabel explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT robertsjtimmons explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT rockmanmarcy explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT warnerbenjaminp explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview AT winthroprobert explainingdifferentialvulnerabilitytoclimatechangeasocialsciencereview |