Cargando…

Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes

The direct electron transfer (DET) of enzymes has been utilized to develop biosensors and enzymatic biofuel cells on micro‐ and nanostructured electrodes. Whereas some enzymes exhibit direct electron transfer between their active‐site cofactor and an electrode, other oxidoreductases depend on acquir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Su, Ludwig, Roland
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/celc.201801256
_version_ 1783412270307475456
author Ma, Su
Ludwig, Roland
author_facet Ma, Su
Ludwig, Roland
author_sort Ma, Su
collection PubMed
description The direct electron transfer (DET) of enzymes has been utilized to develop biosensors and enzymatic biofuel cells on micro‐ and nanostructured electrodes. Whereas some enzymes exhibit direct electron transfer between their active‐site cofactor and an electrode, other oxidoreductases depend on acquired cytochrome domains or cytochrome subunits as built‐in redox mediators. The physiological function of these cytochromes is to transfer electrons between the active‐site cofactor and a redox partner protein. The exchange of the natural electron acceptor/donor by an electrode has been demonstrated for several cytochrome carrying oxidoreductases. These multi‐cofactor enzymes have been applied in third generation biosensors to detect glucose, lactate, and other analytes. This review investigates and classifies oxidoreductases with a cytochrome domain, enzyme complexes with a cytochrome subunit, and covers designed cytochrome fusion enzymes. The structurally and electrochemically best characterized proponents from each enzyme class carrying a cytochrome, that is, flavoenzymes, quinoenzymes, molybdenum‐cofactor enzymes, iron‐sulfur cluster enzymes, and multi‐haem enzymes, are featured, and their biochemical, kinetic, and electrochemical properties are compared. The cytochromes molecular and functional properties as well as their contribution to the interdomain electron transfer (IET, between active‐site and cytochrome) and DET (between cytochrome and electrode) with regard to the achieved current density is discussed. Protein design strategies for cytochrome‐fused enzymes are reviewed and the limiting factors as well as strategies to overcome them are outlined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6472588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64725882019-04-19 Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes Ma, Su Ludwig, Roland ChemElectroChem Reviews The direct electron transfer (DET) of enzymes has been utilized to develop biosensors and enzymatic biofuel cells on micro‐ and nanostructured electrodes. Whereas some enzymes exhibit direct electron transfer between their active‐site cofactor and an electrode, other oxidoreductases depend on acquired cytochrome domains or cytochrome subunits as built‐in redox mediators. The physiological function of these cytochromes is to transfer electrons between the active‐site cofactor and a redox partner protein. The exchange of the natural electron acceptor/donor by an electrode has been demonstrated for several cytochrome carrying oxidoreductases. These multi‐cofactor enzymes have been applied in third generation biosensors to detect glucose, lactate, and other analytes. This review investigates and classifies oxidoreductases with a cytochrome domain, enzyme complexes with a cytochrome subunit, and covers designed cytochrome fusion enzymes. The structurally and electrochemically best characterized proponents from each enzyme class carrying a cytochrome, that is, flavoenzymes, quinoenzymes, molybdenum‐cofactor enzymes, iron‐sulfur cluster enzymes, and multi‐haem enzymes, are featured, and their biochemical, kinetic, and electrochemical properties are compared. The cytochromes molecular and functional properties as well as their contribution to the interdomain electron transfer (IET, between active‐site and cytochrome) and DET (between cytochrome and electrode) with regard to the achieved current density is discussed. Protein design strategies for cytochrome‐fused enzymes are reviewed and the limiting factors as well as strategies to overcome them are outlined. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-13 2019-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6472588/ /pubmed/31008015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/celc.201801256 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Ma, Su
Ludwig, Roland
Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes
title Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes
title_full Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes
title_fullStr Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes
title_full_unstemmed Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes
title_short Direct Electron Transfer of Enzymes Facilitated by Cytochromes
title_sort direct electron transfer of enzymes facilitated by cytochromes
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/celc.201801256
work_keys_str_mv AT masu directelectrontransferofenzymesfacilitatedbycytochromes
AT ludwigroland directelectrontransferofenzymesfacilitatedbycytochromes