Cargando…

Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects

A Monte Carlo method of investigating the effects of placing selection criteria on the magnetic signature of in situ encounters with flux ropes is presented. The technique is applied to two recent flux rope surveys of MESSENGER data within the Hermean magnetotail. It is found that the different crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, A. W., Jackman, C. M., Frohmaier, C. M., Fear, R. C., Slavin, J. A., Coxon, J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025959
_version_ 1783412278174941184
author Smith, A. W.
Jackman, C. M.
Frohmaier, C. M.
Fear, R. C.
Slavin, J. A.
Coxon, J. C.
author_facet Smith, A. W.
Jackman, C. M.
Frohmaier, C. M.
Fear, R. C.
Slavin, J. A.
Coxon, J. C.
author_sort Smith, A. W.
collection PubMed
description A Monte Carlo method of investigating the effects of placing selection criteria on the magnetic signature of in situ encounters with flux ropes is presented. The technique is applied to two recent flux rope surveys of MESSENGER data within the Hermean magnetotail. It is found that the different criteria placed upon the signatures will preferentially identify slightly different subsets of the underlying population. Quantifying the selection biases first allows the distributions of flux rope parameters to be corrected, allowing a more accurate estimation of the intrinsic distributions. This is shown with regard to the distribution of flux rope radii observed. When accounting for the selection criteria, the mean radius of Hermean magnetotail quasi‐force‐free flux ropes is found to be [Formula: see text]  km. Second, it is possible to weight the known identifications in order to determine a rate of recurrence that accounts for the presence of the structures that will not be identified. In the case of the Hermean magnetotail, the average rate of quasi‐force‐free flux ropes is found to 0.12 min(−1) when selection effects are accounted for (up from 0.05 min(−1) previously inferred from observations).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6472627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64726272019-04-19 Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects Smith, A. W. Jackman, C. M. Frohmaier, C. M. Fear, R. C. Slavin, J. A. Coxon, J. C. J Geophys Res Space Phys Research Articles A Monte Carlo method of investigating the effects of placing selection criteria on the magnetic signature of in situ encounters with flux ropes is presented. The technique is applied to two recent flux rope surveys of MESSENGER data within the Hermean magnetotail. It is found that the different criteria placed upon the signatures will preferentially identify slightly different subsets of the underlying population. Quantifying the selection biases first allows the distributions of flux rope parameters to be corrected, allowing a more accurate estimation of the intrinsic distributions. This is shown with regard to the distribution of flux rope radii observed. When accounting for the selection criteria, the mean radius of Hermean magnetotail quasi‐force‐free flux ropes is found to be [Formula: see text]  km. Second, it is possible to weight the known identifications in order to determine a rate of recurrence that accounts for the presence of the structures that will not be identified. In the case of the Hermean magnetotail, the average rate of quasi‐force‐free flux ropes is found to 0.12 min(−1) when selection effects are accounted for (up from 0.05 min(−1) previously inferred from observations). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-12-22 2018-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6472627/ /pubmed/31008004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025959 Text en ©2018. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Smith, A. W.
Jackman, C. M.
Frohmaier, C. M.
Fear, R. C.
Slavin, J. A.
Coxon, J. C.
Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects
title Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects
title_full Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects
title_fullStr Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects
title_short Evaluating Single Spacecraft Observations of Planetary Magnetotails With Simple Monte Carlo Simulations: 2. Magnetic Flux Rope Signature Selection Effects
title_sort evaluating single spacecraft observations of planetary magnetotails with simple monte carlo simulations: 2. magnetic flux rope signature selection effects
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31008004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018JA025959
work_keys_str_mv AT smithaw evaluatingsinglespacecraftobservationsofplanetarymagnetotailswithsimplemontecarlosimulations2magneticfluxropesignatureselectioneffects
AT jackmancm evaluatingsinglespacecraftobservationsofplanetarymagnetotailswithsimplemontecarlosimulations2magneticfluxropesignatureselectioneffects
AT frohmaiercm evaluatingsinglespacecraftobservationsofplanetarymagnetotailswithsimplemontecarlosimulations2magneticfluxropesignatureselectioneffects
AT fearrc evaluatingsinglespacecraftobservationsofplanetarymagnetotailswithsimplemontecarlosimulations2magneticfluxropesignatureselectioneffects
AT slavinja evaluatingsinglespacecraftobservationsofplanetarymagnetotailswithsimplemontecarlosimulations2magneticfluxropesignatureselectioneffects
AT coxonjc evaluatingsinglespacecraftobservationsofplanetarymagnetotailswithsimplemontecarlosimulations2magneticfluxropesignatureselectioneffects