Cargando…
Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition
Selective inhibition describes the stopping of an action while other actions are further executed. It can be differentiated between two strategies to stop selectively: the fast but global stop all, then discriminate strategy and the slower but more selective first discriminate, then stop strategy. I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214652 |
_version_ | 1783412299931844608 |
---|---|
author | Antons, Stephanie Boecker, Maren Gauggel, Siegfried Gordi, Vera Michaela Patel, Harshal Jayeshkumar Binkofski, Ferdinand Drueke, Barbara |
author_facet | Antons, Stephanie Boecker, Maren Gauggel, Siegfried Gordi, Vera Michaela Patel, Harshal Jayeshkumar Binkofski, Ferdinand Drueke, Barbara |
author_sort | Antons, Stephanie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective inhibition describes the stopping of an action while other actions are further executed. It can be differentiated between two strategies to stop selectively: the fast but global stop all, then discriminate strategy and the slower but more selective first discriminate, then stop strategy. It is assumed that the first discriminate, then stop strategy is especially used when information regarding which action might have to be stopped is already available beforehand. Moreover, it is supposed that both strategies differ in matters of basal ganglia pathways used for their execution. Aim of the present study was to investigate the use of the two strategies in situations requiring selective changing of an action. Eighteen healthy male participants performed a selective stop-change task with informative and uninformative cues during fMRI. Behavioral results show that informative cues led to a benefit in both inhibition times and selectivity. FMRI data revealed that the same cortico-subcortical pathway was used with informative and uninformative cues. Behavioral and neuronal results indicate that participants used the first discriminate, then stop strategy for selective inhibition irrespective of the amount of previously available information. Moreover, the neural activity data indicate that the benefit in the informed condition was produced by an efficient preparation for the concrete change process. Possible factors that might affect which strategy is used for selective stopping are the level of previously available information (foreknowledge) and the experimental set-up, as e.g. task complexity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6472739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64727392019-05-03 Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition Antons, Stephanie Boecker, Maren Gauggel, Siegfried Gordi, Vera Michaela Patel, Harshal Jayeshkumar Binkofski, Ferdinand Drueke, Barbara PLoS One Research Article Selective inhibition describes the stopping of an action while other actions are further executed. It can be differentiated between two strategies to stop selectively: the fast but global stop all, then discriminate strategy and the slower but more selective first discriminate, then stop strategy. It is assumed that the first discriminate, then stop strategy is especially used when information regarding which action might have to be stopped is already available beforehand. Moreover, it is supposed that both strategies differ in matters of basal ganglia pathways used for their execution. Aim of the present study was to investigate the use of the two strategies in situations requiring selective changing of an action. Eighteen healthy male participants performed a selective stop-change task with informative and uninformative cues during fMRI. Behavioral results show that informative cues led to a benefit in both inhibition times and selectivity. FMRI data revealed that the same cortico-subcortical pathway was used with informative and uninformative cues. Behavioral and neuronal results indicate that participants used the first discriminate, then stop strategy for selective inhibition irrespective of the amount of previously available information. Moreover, the neural activity data indicate that the benefit in the informed condition was produced by an efficient preparation for the concrete change process. Possible factors that might affect which strategy is used for selective stopping are the level of previously available information (foreknowledge) and the experimental set-up, as e.g. task complexity. Public Library of Science 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6472739/ /pubmed/30998717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214652 Text en © 2019 Antons et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Antons, Stephanie Boecker, Maren Gauggel, Siegfried Gordi, Vera Michaela Patel, Harshal Jayeshkumar Binkofski, Ferdinand Drueke, Barbara Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
title | Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
title_full | Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
title_fullStr | Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
title_short | Strategies of selective changing: Preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
title_sort | strategies of selective changing: preparatory neural processes seem to be responsible for differences in complex inhibition |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT antonsstephanie strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition AT boeckermaren strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition AT gauggelsiegfried strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition AT gordiveramichaela strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition AT patelharshaljayeshkumar strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition AT binkofskiferdinand strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition AT druekebarbara strategiesofselectivechangingpreparatoryneuralprocessesseemtoberesponsiblefordifferencesincomplexinhibition |