Cargando…

A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants provide an effective treatment option for those with severe hearing loss, including those with preserved low frequency hearing. However, certain issues can reduce implant efficacy including intracochlear tissue response and delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing. We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claussen, Alexander D., Vielman Quevedo, René, Mostaert, Brian, Kirk, Jonathon R., Dueck, Wolfram F., Hansen, Marlan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215407
_version_ 1783412305771364352
author Claussen, Alexander D.
Vielman Quevedo, René
Mostaert, Brian
Kirk, Jonathon R.
Dueck, Wolfram F.
Hansen, Marlan R.
author_facet Claussen, Alexander D.
Vielman Quevedo, René
Mostaert, Brian
Kirk, Jonathon R.
Dueck, Wolfram F.
Hansen, Marlan R.
author_sort Claussen, Alexander D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants provide an effective treatment option for those with severe hearing loss, including those with preserved low frequency hearing. However, certain issues can reduce implant efficacy including intracochlear tissue response and delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing. We describe a mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation that can be used to study cochlear implant biology and related pathologies. METHODS: Twelve normal hearing adult CBA/J mice underwent unilateral cochlear implantation and were evenly divided into one group receiving electric stimulation and one not. Serial impedance and neural response telemetry (NRT) measurements were made to assess implant functionality. Functionality was defined as having at least one electrode with an impedance ≤ 35 kOhms. Mouse cochleae were harvested for histology and 3D x-ray microscopy 21 days post-operatively, or, in case the implant was still functional, at a later time point when the implant failed. A separate experiment measured the hearing preservation rate in 7 adult CBA/J mice undergoing unilateral cochlear implantation with serial auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). RESULTS: Implants maintained functionality for a mean of 35 days in the non-stimulated group and 19.8 days in the stimulated group. Reliable NRT and behavioral responses to electric stimulation were recorded. A robust intracochlear peri-implant tissue response with neo-ossification was seen in all cochleae. Six of seven mice maintained intact low frequency hearing up to 6 weeks following cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of cochlear implantation and behaviorally significant electric stimulation in the mouse, with the potential for hearing preservation. This model may be combined with established mouse models of hearing loss and the large genetic and molecular research toolkit unique to the mouse for mechanistic and therapeutic investigations of cochlear implant biology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6472764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64727642019-05-03 A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation Claussen, Alexander D. Vielman Quevedo, René Mostaert, Brian Kirk, Jonathon R. Dueck, Wolfram F. Hansen, Marlan R. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implants provide an effective treatment option for those with severe hearing loss, including those with preserved low frequency hearing. However, certain issues can reduce implant efficacy including intracochlear tissue response and delayed loss of residual acoustic hearing. We describe a mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation that can be used to study cochlear implant biology and related pathologies. METHODS: Twelve normal hearing adult CBA/J mice underwent unilateral cochlear implantation and were evenly divided into one group receiving electric stimulation and one not. Serial impedance and neural response telemetry (NRT) measurements were made to assess implant functionality. Functionality was defined as having at least one electrode with an impedance ≤ 35 kOhms. Mouse cochleae were harvested for histology and 3D x-ray microscopy 21 days post-operatively, or, in case the implant was still functional, at a later time point when the implant failed. A separate experiment measured the hearing preservation rate in 7 adult CBA/J mice undergoing unilateral cochlear implantation with serial auditory brainstem response (ABR) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE). RESULTS: Implants maintained functionality for a mean of 35 days in the non-stimulated group and 19.8 days in the stimulated group. Reliable NRT and behavioral responses to electric stimulation were recorded. A robust intracochlear peri-implant tissue response with neo-ossification was seen in all cochleae. Six of seven mice maintained intact low frequency hearing up to 6 weeks following cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of cochlear implantation and behaviorally significant electric stimulation in the mouse, with the potential for hearing preservation. This model may be combined with established mouse models of hearing loss and the large genetic and molecular research toolkit unique to the mouse for mechanistic and therapeutic investigations of cochlear implant biology. Public Library of Science 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6472764/ /pubmed/30998726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215407 Text en © 2019 Claussen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Claussen, Alexander D.
Vielman Quevedo, René
Mostaert, Brian
Kirk, Jonathon R.
Dueck, Wolfram F.
Hansen, Marlan R.
A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
title A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
title_full A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
title_fullStr A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
title_full_unstemmed A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
title_short A mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
title_sort mouse model of cochlear implantation with chronic electric stimulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6472764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30998726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215407
work_keys_str_mv AT claussenalexanderd amousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT vielmanquevedorene amousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT mostaertbrian amousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT kirkjonathonr amousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT dueckwolframf amousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT hansenmarlanr amousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT claussenalexanderd mousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT vielmanquevedorene mousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT mostaertbrian mousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT kirkjonathonr mousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT dueckwolframf mousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation
AT hansenmarlanr mousemodelofcochlearimplantationwithchronicelectricstimulation