Cargando…

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency

We have carried out a retrospective study of chromosome anomalies associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) in order to compare yield rates of karyotype, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in this condition. Presenting with increased NT or cystic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cicatiello, Rita, Pignataro, Piero, Izzo, Antonella, Mollo, Nunzia, Pezone, Lucia, Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria, Sarno, Laura, Sglavo, Gabriella, Conti, Anna, Genesio, Rita, Nitsch, Lucio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30818867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7030040
_version_ 1783412426411081728
author Cicatiello, Rita
Pignataro, Piero
Izzo, Antonella
Mollo, Nunzia
Pezone, Lucia
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
Sarno, Laura
Sglavo, Gabriella
Conti, Anna
Genesio, Rita
Nitsch, Lucio
author_facet Cicatiello, Rita
Pignataro, Piero
Izzo, Antonella
Mollo, Nunzia
Pezone, Lucia
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
Sarno, Laura
Sglavo, Gabriella
Conti, Anna
Genesio, Rita
Nitsch, Lucio
author_sort Cicatiello, Rita
collection PubMed
description We have carried out a retrospective study of chromosome anomalies associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) in order to compare yield rates of karyotype, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in this condition. Presenting with increased NT or cystic hygroma ≥3.5 mm as an isolated sign, 249 fetuses underwent karyotype and/or CMA from 11 to 18 gestational weeks. Karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses detected 103 chromosomal anomalies including 95 aneuploidies and eight chromosomal rearrangements or derivatives. Further, seven pathogenic copy number variants (CNV), five likely pathogenic CNVs, and 15 variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected by CMA in fetuses with normal karyotype. Genetic testing is now facing new challenges due to results with uncertain clinical impacts. Additional investigations will be necessary to interpret these findings. More than 15% of the anomalies that we have diagnosed with invasive techniques could not be detected by NIPT. It is therefore definitely not recommended in the case of ultrasound anomalies. These results, while corroborating the use of CMA in fetuses with increased NT as a second tier after rapid aneuploidy testing, do not suggest a dismissal of karyotype analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6473420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64734202019-04-29 Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency Cicatiello, Rita Pignataro, Piero Izzo, Antonella Mollo, Nunzia Pezone, Lucia Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria Sarno, Laura Sglavo, Gabriella Conti, Anna Genesio, Rita Nitsch, Lucio Med Sci (Basel) Article We have carried out a retrospective study of chromosome anomalies associated with increased nuchal translucency (NT) in order to compare yield rates of karyotype, chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), and non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in this condition. Presenting with increased NT or cystic hygroma ≥3.5 mm as an isolated sign, 249 fetuses underwent karyotype and/or CMA from 11 to 18 gestational weeks. Karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses detected 103 chromosomal anomalies including 95 aneuploidies and eight chromosomal rearrangements or derivatives. Further, seven pathogenic copy number variants (CNV), five likely pathogenic CNVs, and 15 variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected by CMA in fetuses with normal karyotype. Genetic testing is now facing new challenges due to results with uncertain clinical impacts. Additional investigations will be necessary to interpret these findings. More than 15% of the anomalies that we have diagnosed with invasive techniques could not be detected by NIPT. It is therefore definitely not recommended in the case of ultrasound anomalies. These results, while corroborating the use of CMA in fetuses with increased NT as a second tier after rapid aneuploidy testing, do not suggest a dismissal of karyotype analysis. MDPI 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6473420/ /pubmed/30818867 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7030040 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cicatiello, Rita
Pignataro, Piero
Izzo, Antonella
Mollo, Nunzia
Pezone, Lucia
Maruotti, Giuseppe Maria
Sarno, Laura
Sglavo, Gabriella
Conti, Anna
Genesio, Rita
Nitsch, Lucio
Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency
title Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency
title_full Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency
title_fullStr Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency
title_full_unstemmed Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency
title_short Chromosomal Microarray Analysis versus Karyotyping in Fetuses with Increased Nuchal Translucency
title_sort chromosomal microarray analysis versus karyotyping in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30818867
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medsci7030040
work_keys_str_mv AT cicatiellorita chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT pignataropiero chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT izzoantonella chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT mollonunzia chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT pezonelucia chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT maruottigiuseppemaria chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT sarnolaura chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT sglavogabriella chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT contianna chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT genesiorita chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency
AT nitschlucio chromosomalmicroarrayanalysisversuskaryotypinginfetuseswithincreasednuchaltranslucency