Cargando…
Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine
Precision medicine, aka stratified/personalized medicine, is becoming more pronounced in the medical field due to advancement in computational ability to learn about patient genomic backgrounds. A biomaker, i.e. a type of biological process indicator, is often used in precision medicine to classify...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2018.06.004 |
_version_ | 1783412455740801024 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Kim May Wason, James |
author_facet | Lee, Kim May Wason, James |
author_sort | Lee, Kim May |
collection | PubMed |
description | Precision medicine, aka stratified/personalized medicine, is becoming more pronounced in the medical field due to advancement in computational ability to learn about patient genomic backgrounds. A biomaker, i.e. a type of biological process indicator, is often used in precision medicine to classify patient population into several subgroups. The aim of precision medicine is to tailor treatment regimes for different patient subgroups who suffer from the same disease. A multi-arm design could be conducted to explore the effect of treatment regimes on different biomarker subgroups. However, if treatments work only on certain subgroups, which is often the case, enrolling all patient subgroups in a confirmatory trial would increase the burden of a study. Having observed a phase II trial, we propose a design framework for finding an optimal design that could be implemented in a phase III study or a confirmatory trial. We consider two elements in our approach: Bayesian data analysis of observed data, and design of experiments. The first tool selects subgroups and treatments to be enrolled in the future trial whereas the second tool provides an optimal treatment randomization scheme for each selected/enrolled subgroups. Considering two independent treatments and two independent biomarkers, we illustrate our approach using simulation studies. We demonstrate efficiency gain, i.e. high probability of recommending truly effective treatments in the right subgroup, of the optimal design found by our framework over a randomized controlled trial and a biomarker–treatment linked trial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6473552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64735522019-04-19 Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine Lee, Kim May Wason, James J Stat Plan Inference Article Precision medicine, aka stratified/personalized medicine, is becoming more pronounced in the medical field due to advancement in computational ability to learn about patient genomic backgrounds. A biomaker, i.e. a type of biological process indicator, is often used in precision medicine to classify patient population into several subgroups. The aim of precision medicine is to tailor treatment regimes for different patient subgroups who suffer from the same disease. A multi-arm design could be conducted to explore the effect of treatment regimes on different biomarker subgroups. However, if treatments work only on certain subgroups, which is often the case, enrolling all patient subgroups in a confirmatory trial would increase the burden of a study. Having observed a phase II trial, we propose a design framework for finding an optimal design that could be implemented in a phase III study or a confirmatory trial. We consider two elements in our approach: Bayesian data analysis of observed data, and design of experiments. The first tool selects subgroups and treatments to be enrolled in the future trial whereas the second tool provides an optimal treatment randomization scheme for each selected/enrolled subgroups. Considering two independent treatments and two independent biomarkers, we illustrate our approach using simulation studies. We demonstrate efficiency gain, i.e. high probability of recommending truly effective treatments in the right subgroup, of the optimal design found by our framework over a randomized controlled trial and a biomarker–treatment linked trial. Elsevier 2019-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6473552/ /pubmed/31007363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2018.06.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Kim May Wason, James Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
title | Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
title_full | Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
title_fullStr | Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
title_full_unstemmed | Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
title_short | Design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
title_sort | design of experiments for a confirmatory trial of precision medicine |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2018.06.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leekimmay designofexperimentsforaconfirmatorytrialofprecisionmedicine AT wasonjames designofexperimentsforaconfirmatorytrialofprecisionmedicine |