Cargando…

A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series

Connectivity studies of the brain are usually based on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experiments involving many subjects. These studies need to take into account not only the interaction between areas of a single brain but also the differences amongst those subjects. In this paper we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Lilia, Smith, James Q., Nichols, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2018.03.004
_version_ 1783412456200077312
author Costa, Lilia
Smith, James Q.
Nichols, Thomas
author_facet Costa, Lilia
Smith, James Q.
Nichols, Thomas
author_sort Costa, Lilia
collection PubMed
description Connectivity studies of the brain are usually based on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experiments involving many subjects. These studies need to take into account not only the interaction between areas of a single brain but also the differences amongst those subjects. In this paper we develop a methodology called the group-structure (GS) approach that models possible heterogeneity between subjects and searches for distinct homogeneous sub-groups according to some measure that reflects the connectivity maps. We suggest a GS method that uses a novel distance based on a model selection measure, the Bayes factor. We then develop a new class of Multiregression Dynamic Models to estimate individual networks whilst acknowledging a GS type dependence structure across subjects. We compare the efficacy of this methodology to three other methods, virtual-typical-subject (VTS), individual-structure (IS) and common-structure (CS), used to infer a group network using both synthetic and real fMRI data. We find that the GS approach provides results that are both more consistent with the data and more flexible in their interpretative power than its competitors. In addition, we present two methods, the Individual Estimation of Multiple Networks (IEMN) and the Marginal Estimation of Multiple Networks (MEMN), generated from the GS approach and used to estimate all types of networks informed by an experiment —individual, homogeneous subgroups and group networks. These methods are then compared both from a theoretical perspective and in practice using real fMRI data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6473554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64735542019-04-19 A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series Costa, Lilia Smith, James Q. Nichols, Thomas J Stat Plan Inference Article Connectivity studies of the brain are usually based on functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) experiments involving many subjects. These studies need to take into account not only the interaction between areas of a single brain but also the differences amongst those subjects. In this paper we develop a methodology called the group-structure (GS) approach that models possible heterogeneity between subjects and searches for distinct homogeneous sub-groups according to some measure that reflects the connectivity maps. We suggest a GS method that uses a novel distance based on a model selection measure, the Bayes factor. We then develop a new class of Multiregression Dynamic Models to estimate individual networks whilst acknowledging a GS type dependence structure across subjects. We compare the efficacy of this methodology to three other methods, virtual-typical-subject (VTS), individual-structure (IS) and common-structure (CS), used to infer a group network using both synthetic and real fMRI data. We find that the GS approach provides results that are both more consistent with the data and more flexible in their interpretative power than its competitors. In addition, we present two methods, the Individual Estimation of Multiple Networks (IEMN) and the Marginal Estimation of Multiple Networks (MEMN), generated from the GS approach and used to estimate all types of networks informed by an experiment —individual, homogeneous subgroups and group networks. These methods are then compared both from a theoretical perspective and in practice using real fMRI data. Elsevier 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6473554/ /pubmed/31007362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2018.03.004 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Costa, Lilia
Smith, James Q.
Nichols, Thomas
A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series
title A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series
title_full A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series
title_fullStr A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series
title_full_unstemmed A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series
title_short A group analysis using the Multiregression Dynamic Models for fMRI networked time series
title_sort group analysis using the multiregression dynamic models for fmri networked time series
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31007362
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2018.03.004
work_keys_str_mv AT costalilia agroupanalysisusingthemultiregressiondynamicmodelsforfmrinetworkedtimeseries
AT smithjamesq agroupanalysisusingthemultiregressiondynamicmodelsforfmrinetworkedtimeseries
AT nicholsthomas agroupanalysisusingthemultiregressiondynamicmodelsforfmrinetworkedtimeseries
AT costalilia groupanalysisusingthemultiregressiondynamicmodelsforfmrinetworkedtimeseries
AT smithjamesq groupanalysisusingthemultiregressiondynamicmodelsforfmrinetworkedtimeseries
AT nicholsthomas groupanalysisusingthemultiregressiondynamicmodelsforfmrinetworkedtimeseries