Cargando…
Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream
Satellite charging is one of the most important risks for satellites on orbit. Satellite charging can lead to an electrostatic discharge resulting in component damage, phantom commands, and loss of service and in exceptional cases total satellite loss. Here we construct a realistic worst case for a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001948 |
_version_ | 1783412482010775552 |
---|---|
author | Horne, Richard B. Phillips, Mark W. Glauert, Sarah A. Meredith, Nigel P. Hands, Alex D. P. Ryden, Keith A. Li, Wen |
author_facet | Horne, Richard B. Phillips, Mark W. Glauert, Sarah A. Meredith, Nigel P. Hands, Alex D. P. Ryden, Keith A. Li, Wen |
author_sort | Horne, Richard B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Satellite charging is one of the most important risks for satellites on orbit. Satellite charging can lead to an electrostatic discharge resulting in component damage, phantom commands, and loss of service and in exceptional cases total satellite loss. Here we construct a realistic worst case for a fast solar wind stream event lasting 5 days or more and use a physical model to calculate the maximum electron flux greater than 2 MeV for geostationary orbit. We find that the flux tends toward a value of 10(6) cm(−2)·s(−1)·sr(−1) after 5 days and remains high for another 5 days. The resulting flux is comparable to a 1 in 150‐year event found from an independent statistical analysis of electron data. Approximately 2.5 mm of Al shielding would be required to reduce the internal charging current to below the National Aeronautics and Space Administration‐recommended guidelines, much more than is currently used. Thus, we would expect many satellites to report electrostatic discharge anomalies during such an event with a strong likelihood of service outage and total satellite loss. We conclude that satellites at geostationary orbit are more likely to be at risk from fast solar wind stream event than a Carrington‐type storm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6473668 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64736682019-04-24 Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream Horne, Richard B. Phillips, Mark W. Glauert, Sarah A. Meredith, Nigel P. Hands, Alex D. P. Ryden, Keith A. Li, Wen Space Weather Research Articles Satellite charging is one of the most important risks for satellites on orbit. Satellite charging can lead to an electrostatic discharge resulting in component damage, phantom commands, and loss of service and in exceptional cases total satellite loss. Here we construct a realistic worst case for a fast solar wind stream event lasting 5 days or more and use a physical model to calculate the maximum electron flux greater than 2 MeV for geostationary orbit. We find that the flux tends toward a value of 10(6) cm(−2)·s(−1)·sr(−1) after 5 days and remains high for another 5 days. The resulting flux is comparable to a 1 in 150‐year event found from an independent statistical analysis of electron data. Approximately 2.5 mm of Al shielding would be required to reduce the internal charging current to below the National Aeronautics and Space Administration‐recommended guidelines, much more than is currently used. Thus, we would expect many satellites to report electrostatic discharge anomalies during such an event with a strong likelihood of service outage and total satellite loss. We conclude that satellites at geostationary orbit are more likely to be at risk from fast solar wind stream event than a Carrington‐type storm. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-03 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6473668/ /pubmed/31031572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001948 Text en ©2018. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Horne, Richard B. Phillips, Mark W. Glauert, Sarah A. Meredith, Nigel P. Hands, Alex D. P. Ryden, Keith A. Li, Wen Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream |
title | Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream |
title_full | Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream |
title_fullStr | Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream |
title_full_unstemmed | Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream |
title_short | Realistic Worst Case for a Severe Space Weather Event Driven by a Fast Solar Wind Stream |
title_sort | realistic worst case for a severe space weather event driven by a fast solar wind stream |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31031572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2018SW001948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hornerichardb realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream AT phillipsmarkw realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream AT glauertsaraha realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream AT meredithnigelp realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream AT handsalexdp realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream AT rydenkeitha realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream AT liwen realisticworstcaseforaseverespaceweathereventdrivenbyafastsolarwindstream |