Cargando…

Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval

Background: Emergence of Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval (LuPOR) may revolutionize the practice regarding the time-sensitive nature of poor responders ascertaining a higher number of oocytes, in a shorter amount of time. This may be especially important in view of employing the approach of natural cyc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos, Simopoulou, Mara, Maziotis, Evangelos, Giannelou, Polina, Tsioulou, Petroula, Rapani, Anna, Pantou, Agni, Petroutsou, Konstantina, Angeli, Irene, Deligeoroglou, Efthymios, Koutsilieris, Michael, Pantos, Konstantinos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55030068
_version_ 1783412532050919424
author Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos
Simopoulou, Mara
Maziotis, Evangelos
Giannelou, Polina
Tsioulou, Petroula
Rapani, Anna
Pantou, Agni
Petroutsou, Konstantina
Angeli, Irene
Deligeoroglou, Efthymios
Koutsilieris, Michael
Pantos, Konstantinos
author_facet Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos
Simopoulou, Mara
Maziotis, Evangelos
Giannelou, Polina
Tsioulou, Petroula
Rapani, Anna
Pantou, Agni
Petroutsou, Konstantina
Angeli, Irene
Deligeoroglou, Efthymios
Koutsilieris, Michael
Pantos, Konstantinos
author_sort Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos
collection PubMed
description Background: Emergence of Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval (LuPOR) may revolutionize the practice regarding the time-sensitive nature of poor responders ascertaining a higher number of oocytes, in a shorter amount of time. This may be especially important in view of employing the approach of natural cycles for Poor Responders. We suggest the acronym LuPOR describing the clinical practice of luteal phase oocyte retrieval. The aim of the study is to offer insight regarding the identity of LuPOR, and highlight how this practice may improve management of the special subgroup of poor responders. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective observational clinical study includes the collection and statistical analysis of data from 136 poor responders who underwent follicular oocyte retrieval (FoPOR) and subsequent LuPOR in natural cycles, during their In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment, from the time period of 2015 to 2018. All 136 participants were diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve (POR) according to Bologna criteria. The 272 cycles were categorized as follows: 136 natural cycles with only FoPORs (Control Group) and 136 natural cycles including both FoPORs and LuPORs. Results: Our primary results indicate no statistically significant differences with regards to the mean number of oocytes, the maturation status, and fertilization rate between FoPOR and LuPOR in natural cycles. Secondarily, we demonstrate a statistically significant higher yield of oocytes (2.50 ± 0.78 vs. 1.25 ± 0.53), better oocyte maturity status (1.93 ± 0.69 vs. 0.95 ± 0.59) and higher fertilization rate (1.31 ± 0.87 vs. 0.61 ± 0.60) in natural cycles including both FoPOR and LuPOR, when compared to cycles including only FoPOR. Conclusion: Our study may contribute towards the establishment of an efficient poor responders’ management through the natural cycle approach, paving a novel clinical practice and ascertaining the opportunity to employ oocytes and embryos originating from a luteal phase follicular wave.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6473900
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64739002019-05-02 Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos Simopoulou, Mara Maziotis, Evangelos Giannelou, Polina Tsioulou, Petroula Rapani, Anna Pantou, Agni Petroutsou, Konstantina Angeli, Irene Deligeoroglou, Efthymios Koutsilieris, Michael Pantos, Konstantinos Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background: Emergence of Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval (LuPOR) may revolutionize the practice regarding the time-sensitive nature of poor responders ascertaining a higher number of oocytes, in a shorter amount of time. This may be especially important in view of employing the approach of natural cycles for Poor Responders. We suggest the acronym LuPOR describing the clinical practice of luteal phase oocyte retrieval. The aim of the study is to offer insight regarding the identity of LuPOR, and highlight how this practice may improve management of the special subgroup of poor responders. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective observational clinical study includes the collection and statistical analysis of data from 136 poor responders who underwent follicular oocyte retrieval (FoPOR) and subsequent LuPOR in natural cycles, during their In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) treatment, from the time period of 2015 to 2018. All 136 participants were diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve (POR) according to Bologna criteria. The 272 cycles were categorized as follows: 136 natural cycles with only FoPORs (Control Group) and 136 natural cycles including both FoPORs and LuPORs. Results: Our primary results indicate no statistically significant differences with regards to the mean number of oocytes, the maturation status, and fertilization rate between FoPOR and LuPOR in natural cycles. Secondarily, we demonstrate a statistically significant higher yield of oocytes (2.50 ± 0.78 vs. 1.25 ± 0.53), better oocyte maturity status (1.93 ± 0.69 vs. 0.95 ± 0.59) and higher fertilization rate (1.31 ± 0.87 vs. 0.61 ± 0.60) in natural cycles including both FoPOR and LuPOR, when compared to cycles including only FoPOR. Conclusion: Our study may contribute towards the establishment of an efficient poor responders’ management through the natural cycle approach, paving a novel clinical practice and ascertaining the opportunity to employ oocytes and embryos originating from a luteal phase follicular wave. MDPI 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6473900/ /pubmed/30875815 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55030068 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sfakianoudis, Konstantinos
Simopoulou, Mara
Maziotis, Evangelos
Giannelou, Polina
Tsioulou, Petroula
Rapani, Anna
Pantou, Agni
Petroutsou, Konstantina
Angeli, Irene
Deligeoroglou, Efthymios
Koutsilieris, Michael
Pantos, Konstantinos
Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
title Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
title_full Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
title_short Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval
title_sort evaluation of the second follicular wave phenomenon in natural cycle assisted reproduction: a key option for poor responders through luteal phase oocyte retrieval
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473900/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30875815
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina55030068
work_keys_str_mv AT sfakianoudiskonstantinos evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT simopouloumara evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT maziotisevangelos evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT gianneloupolina evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT tsiouloupetroula evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT rapanianna evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT pantouagni evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT petroutsoukonstantina evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT angeliirene evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT deligeoroglouefthymios evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT koutsilierismichael evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval
AT pantoskonstantinos evaluationofthesecondfollicularwavephenomenoninnaturalcycleassistedreproductionakeyoptionforpoorrespondersthroughlutealphaseoocyteretrieval