Cargando…

Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment

The cost of most primary materials is increasing, therefore, finding innovative solutions for the re-use of residual waste has become a topic discussed more intensely in recent years. WPCs certainly meet some of these demands. The presented study is focused on an experimental analysis of the effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nečasová, Barbora, Liška, Pavel, Kelar, Jakub, Šlanhof, Jiří
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11030397
_version_ 1783412539163410432
author Nečasová, Barbora
Liška, Pavel
Kelar, Jakub
Šlanhof, Jiří
author_facet Nečasová, Barbora
Liška, Pavel
Kelar, Jakub
Šlanhof, Jiří
author_sort Nečasová, Barbora
collection PubMed
description The cost of most primary materials is increasing, therefore, finding innovative solutions for the re-use of residual waste has become a topic discussed more intensely in recent years. WPCs certainly meet some of these demands. The presented study is focused on an experimental analysis of the effect of surface treatment on the adhesive properties of selected WPCs. Bonding of polymer-based materials is a rather complicated phenomenon and modification of the bonded area in order to improve the adhesive properties is required. Two traditional types of surface treatments and one entirely new approach have been used: mechanical with sandpaper, chemical with 10 wt % NaOH solution and physical modification of the surface by means of a MHSDBD plasma source. For comparison purposes, two high-density polyethylene based products and one polyvinyl-chloride based product with different component ratios were tested. A bonded joint was made using a moisture-curing permanently elastic one-component polyurethane pre-polymer adhesive. Standardized tensile and shear test methods were performed after surface treatment. All tested surface treatments resulted in an improvement of adhesive properties and an increase in bond strength, however, the MHSDBD plasma treatment was proven to be a more suitable surface modification for all selected WPCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6473932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64739322019-04-29 Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment Nečasová, Barbora Liška, Pavel Kelar, Jakub Šlanhof, Jiří Polymers (Basel) Article The cost of most primary materials is increasing, therefore, finding innovative solutions for the re-use of residual waste has become a topic discussed more intensely in recent years. WPCs certainly meet some of these demands. The presented study is focused on an experimental analysis of the effect of surface treatment on the adhesive properties of selected WPCs. Bonding of polymer-based materials is a rather complicated phenomenon and modification of the bonded area in order to improve the adhesive properties is required. Two traditional types of surface treatments and one entirely new approach have been used: mechanical with sandpaper, chemical with 10 wt % NaOH solution and physical modification of the surface by means of a MHSDBD plasma source. For comparison purposes, two high-density polyethylene based products and one polyvinyl-chloride based product with different component ratios were tested. A bonded joint was made using a moisture-curing permanently elastic one-component polyurethane pre-polymer adhesive. Standardized tensile and shear test methods were performed after surface treatment. All tested surface treatments resulted in an improvement of adhesive properties and an increase in bond strength, however, the MHSDBD plasma treatment was proven to be a more suitable surface modification for all selected WPCs. MDPI 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6473932/ /pubmed/30960381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11030397 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nečasová, Barbora
Liška, Pavel
Kelar, Jakub
Šlanhof, Jiří
Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment
title Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment
title_full Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment
title_fullStr Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment
title_short Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Polyurethane Adhesive System and Wood-plastic Composites with Different Polymers after Mechanical, Chemical and Physical Surface Treatment
title_sort comparison of adhesive properties of polyurethane adhesive system and wood-plastic composites with different polymers after mechanical, chemical and physical surface treatment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6473932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30960381
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym11030397
work_keys_str_mv AT necasovabarbora comparisonofadhesivepropertiesofpolyurethaneadhesivesystemandwoodplasticcompositeswithdifferentpolymersaftermechanicalchemicalandphysicalsurfacetreatment
AT liskapavel comparisonofadhesivepropertiesofpolyurethaneadhesivesystemandwoodplasticcompositeswithdifferentpolymersaftermechanicalchemicalandphysicalsurfacetreatment
AT kelarjakub comparisonofadhesivepropertiesofpolyurethaneadhesivesystemandwoodplasticcompositeswithdifferentpolymersaftermechanicalchemicalandphysicalsurfacetreatment
AT slanhofjiri comparisonofadhesivepropertiesofpolyurethaneadhesivesystemandwoodplasticcompositeswithdifferentpolymersaftermechanicalchemicalandphysicalsurfacetreatment