Cargando…

Correction to: Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Colledge, Flora, De Massougnes, Sophie, Elger, Bernice
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2019
Materias:	Correction
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30999959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-019-0365-y

Ejemplares similares

Consent requirements for research with human tissue: Swiss ethics committee members disagree
por: Colledge, Flora, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Tripp, John H, et al.
Publicado: (1995)

Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree?
por: Hotopf, Matthew
Publicado: (1995)

Why Do Research Ethics Committees Disagree with Each Other?
por: Foster, Claire
Publicado: (1995)

Points of contention: Qualitative research identifying where researchers and research ethics committees disagree about consent waivers for secondary research with tissue and data
por: Ballantyne, Angela, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

“I Agree to Disagree”: Comparative Ethical and Legal Analysis of Big Data and Genomics for Privacy, Consent, and Ownership
por: Belani, Seema, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Informed consent in Sri Lanka: A survey among ethics committee members
por: Sumathipala, Athula, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Is it easy to be an Ethics Committee member? (Experiences as an Ethics Committee member)
por: Chaturvedi, Santosh K.
Publicado: (2017)

Social Media Terms and Conditions and Informed Consent From Children: Ethical Analysis
por: Schneble, Christophe Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Informed consent and ethics committee approval in laboratory medicine
por: Borovecki, Ana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Correction: Cortical movement of Bicoid in early Drosophila embryos is actin- and microtubule-dependent and disagrees with the SDD diffusion model
por: Cai, Xiaoli, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

“Conferring Authorship”: Biobank Stakeholders’ Experiences with Publication Credit in Collaborative Research
por: Colledge, Flora M. A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Disagreeing in context
por: Marques, Teresa
Publicado: (2015)

Doctors Disagree
Publicado: (1920)

Doctors Disagree
Publicado: (1886)

Doctors Disagree
Publicado: (1887)

Doctors Disagree
por: Jennings, Ella A.
Publicado: (1892)

Ethics committee member: Reviewing the ‘Ethics’ in clinical research
por: Tripathi, Raakhi
Publicado: (2013)

Correction to: Regulatory, scientific, and ethical issues arising from institutional activity in one of the 90 Italian Research Ethics Committees
por: Benfatto, G., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Reporting ethics committee approval and informed consent: Review of an Ayurvedic journal
por: Bolshete, Pravin M.
Publicado: (2015)

Living bioethics, clinical ethics committees and children's consent to heart surgery
por: Alderson, Priscilla, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Euthanasia: agreeing to disagree?
por: Holm, Søren
Publicado: (2010)

A Retrospective Study of Ethics Committee Monitoring Checklists of the Audiovisual Consent Process: An Ethical Perspective
por: Shetty, Yashashri C, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

We Should Agree to Disagree
por: Park, Joon Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Team members perspectives on conflicts in clinical ethics committees
por: Scherer, Anika, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The role of nursing members in research ethics committees in Japan
por: Sakaida, Yuki, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Challenges of Big Data for Research Ethics Committees: A Qualitative Swiss Study
por: Ferretti, Agata, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Correction to: Implementing clinical ethics committees as a complex intervention: presentation of a feasibility study in community care
por: Magelssen, Morten, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correction: Ethical challenges of using remote monitoring technologies for clinical research: A case study of the role of local research ethics committees in the RADAR-AD study
por: Muurling, Marijn, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Correction to: Depressive symptoms in individuals with family members requiring ADL assistance
por: Kwon, Junhyun, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

General Notices: Doctor’s Don’t Disagree
Publicado: (1893)

Individual notions of fair data sharing from the perspectives of Swiss stakeholders
por: Geneviève, Lester Darryl, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Perspectives of non-specialists on the potential to serve as ethics committee members
por: Kane, Chikako, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about research ethics committees and informed consent among resident doctors
por: Al Demour, Saddam, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

All Our Data Will Be Health Data One Day: The Need for Universal Data Protection and Comprehensive Consent
por: Schneble, Christophe Olivier, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The notion of free will and its ethical relevance for decision-making capacity
por: Zürcher, Tobias, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Citizens, Research Ethics Committee Members and Researchers’ Attitude Toward Information and Consent for the Secondary Use of Health Data: Implications for Research Within Learning Health Systems
por: Cumyn, Annabelle, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Systemic Fairness for Sharing Health Data: Perspectives From Swiss Stakeholders
por: Geneviève, Lester Darryl, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Addressing ethical issues in H3Africa research – the views of research ethics committee members
por: de Vries, Jantina, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ethics Review Committee approval and informed consent: an analysis of biomedical publications originating from Sri Lanka
por: Sumathipala, Athula, et al.
Publicado: (2008)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_fkb1l3r4su3q68m7jod39rnsnb