Cargando…

Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip

DNA methylation age (DNAm age) has become a widely utilized epigenetic biomarker for the aging process. The Horvath method for determining DNAm age is perhaps the most widely utilized and validated DNA methylation age assessment measure. Horvath DNAm age is calculated based on methylation measuremen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dhingra, Radhika, Kwee, Lydia Coulter, Diaz-Sanchez, David, Devlin, Robert B., Cascio, Wayne, Hauser, Elizabeth R., Gregory, Simon, Shah, Svati, Kraus, William E., Olden, Kenneth, Ward-Caviness, Cavin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207834
_version_ 1783412629891448832
author Dhingra, Radhika
Kwee, Lydia Coulter
Diaz-Sanchez, David
Devlin, Robert B.
Cascio, Wayne
Hauser, Elizabeth R.
Gregory, Simon
Shah, Svati
Kraus, William E.
Olden, Kenneth
Ward-Caviness, Cavin K.
author_facet Dhingra, Radhika
Kwee, Lydia Coulter
Diaz-Sanchez, David
Devlin, Robert B.
Cascio, Wayne
Hauser, Elizabeth R.
Gregory, Simon
Shah, Svati
Kraus, William E.
Olden, Kenneth
Ward-Caviness, Cavin K.
author_sort Dhingra, Radhika
collection PubMed
description DNA methylation age (DNAm age) has become a widely utilized epigenetic biomarker for the aging process. The Horvath method for determining DNAm age is perhaps the most widely utilized and validated DNA methylation age assessment measure. Horvath DNAm age is calculated based on methylation measurements at 353 loci, present on Illumina’s 450k and 27k DNA methylation microarrays. With increasing use of the more recently developed Illumina MethylationEPIC (850k) microarray, it is worth revisiting this aging measure to evaluate estimation differences due to array design. Of the requisite 353 loci, 17 are missing from the 850k microarray. Similarly, an alternate, 71 loci DNA methylation age assessment measure created by Hannum et al. is missing 6 requisite loci. Using 17 datasets with 27k, 450k, and/or 850k methylation data, we compared each sample’s epigenetic age estimated from all 353 loci required by the Horvath DNAm age calculator, and using only the 336 loci available on the 850k array. In 450k/27k data, removing loci not on the 850k array resulted in underestimation of Horvath’s DNAm age. Underestimation of Horvath DNAm age increased from ages 0 to ~20, remaining stable thereafter (mean deviation = -3.46 y, SD = 1.13 for individuals ≥20 years). Underestimation of Horvath’s DNAm age by the reduced 450k/27k data was similar to the underestimation observed in the 850k data indicating it is driven by missing probes. In analogous examination of Hannum’s DNAm age, the magnitude and direction of epigenetic age misestimation varied with chronological age. In conclusion, inter-array deviations in DNAm age estimations may be largely driven by missing probes between arrays, despite default probe imputation procedures. Though correlations and associations based on Horvath’s DNAm age may be unaffected, researchers should exercise caution when interpreting results based on absolute differences in DNAm age or when mixing samples assayed on different arrays.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6474589
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64745892019-05-03 Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip Dhingra, Radhika Kwee, Lydia Coulter Diaz-Sanchez, David Devlin, Robert B. Cascio, Wayne Hauser, Elizabeth R. Gregory, Simon Shah, Svati Kraus, William E. Olden, Kenneth Ward-Caviness, Cavin K. PLoS One Research Article DNA methylation age (DNAm age) has become a widely utilized epigenetic biomarker for the aging process. The Horvath method for determining DNAm age is perhaps the most widely utilized and validated DNA methylation age assessment measure. Horvath DNAm age is calculated based on methylation measurements at 353 loci, present on Illumina’s 450k and 27k DNA methylation microarrays. With increasing use of the more recently developed Illumina MethylationEPIC (850k) microarray, it is worth revisiting this aging measure to evaluate estimation differences due to array design. Of the requisite 353 loci, 17 are missing from the 850k microarray. Similarly, an alternate, 71 loci DNA methylation age assessment measure created by Hannum et al. is missing 6 requisite loci. Using 17 datasets with 27k, 450k, and/or 850k methylation data, we compared each sample’s epigenetic age estimated from all 353 loci required by the Horvath DNAm age calculator, and using only the 336 loci available on the 850k array. In 450k/27k data, removing loci not on the 850k array resulted in underestimation of Horvath’s DNAm age. Underestimation of Horvath DNAm age increased from ages 0 to ~20, remaining stable thereafter (mean deviation = -3.46 y, SD = 1.13 for individuals ≥20 years). Underestimation of Horvath’s DNAm age by the reduced 450k/27k data was similar to the underestimation observed in the 850k data indicating it is driven by missing probes. In analogous examination of Hannum’s DNAm age, the magnitude and direction of epigenetic age misestimation varied with chronological age. In conclusion, inter-array deviations in DNAm age estimations may be largely driven by missing probes between arrays, despite default probe imputation procedures. Though correlations and associations based on Horvath’s DNAm age may be unaffected, researchers should exercise caution when interpreting results based on absolute differences in DNAm age or when mixing samples assayed on different arrays. Public Library of Science 2019-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6474589/ /pubmed/31002714 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207834 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dhingra, Radhika
Kwee, Lydia Coulter
Diaz-Sanchez, David
Devlin, Robert B.
Cascio, Wayne
Hauser, Elizabeth R.
Gregory, Simon
Shah, Svati
Kraus, William E.
Olden, Kenneth
Ward-Caviness, Cavin K.
Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip
title Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip
title_full Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip
title_fullStr Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip
title_short Evaluating DNA methylation age on the Illumina MethylationEPIC Bead Chip
title_sort evaluating dna methylation age on the illumina methylationepic bead chip
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002714
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207834
work_keys_str_mv AT dhingraradhika evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT kweelydiacoulter evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT diazsanchezdavid evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT devlinrobertb evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT casciowayne evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT hauserelizabethr evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT gregorysimon evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT shahsvati evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT krauswilliame evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT oldenkenneth evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip
AT wardcavinesscavink evaluatingdnamethylationageontheilluminamethylationepicbeadchip