Cargando…
Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions
Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have improved the ability to estimate densities of rare and elusive animals. However, SCR models have seldom been validated even as model formulations diversify and expand to incorporate new sampling methods and/or additional sources of information on model par...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215458 |
_version_ | 1783412645084266496 |
---|---|
author | Paterson, J. Terrill Proffitt, Kelly Jimenez, Ben Rotella, Jay Garrott, Robert |
author_facet | Paterson, J. Terrill Proffitt, Kelly Jimenez, Ben Rotella, Jay Garrott, Robert |
author_sort | Paterson, J. Terrill |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have improved the ability to estimate densities of rare and elusive animals. However, SCR models have seldom been validated even as model formulations diversify and expand to incorporate new sampling methods and/or additional sources of information on model parameters. Information on the relationship between encounter probabilities, sources of additional information, and the reliability of density estimates, is rare but crucial to assessing reliability of SCR-based estimates. We used a simulation-based approach that incorporated prior empirical work to assess the accuracy and precision of density estimates from SCR models using spatially unstructured sampling. To assess the consequences of sparse data and potential sources of bias, we simulated data under six scenarios corresponding to three different levels of search effort and two levels of correlation between search effort and animal density. We then estimated density for each scenario using four models that included increasing amounts of information from harvested individuals and telemetry to evaluate the impact of additional sources of information. Model results were sensitive to the quantity of available information: density estimates based on low search effort were biased high and imprecise, whereas estimates based on high search effort were unbiased and precise. A correlation between search effort and animal density resulted in a positive bias in density estimates, though the bias decreased with increasingly informative datasets. Adding information from harvested individuals and telemetered individuals improved density estimates based on low and moderate effort but had negligible impact for datasets resulting from high effort. We demonstrated that density estimates from SCR models using spatially unstructured sampling are reliable when sufficient information is provided. Accurate density estimates can result if empirical-based simulations such as those presented here are used to develop study designs with appropriate amounts of effort and information sources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6474654 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64746542019-05-03 Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions Paterson, J. Terrill Proffitt, Kelly Jimenez, Ben Rotella, Jay Garrott, Robert PLoS One Research Article Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models have improved the ability to estimate densities of rare and elusive animals. However, SCR models have seldom been validated even as model formulations diversify and expand to incorporate new sampling methods and/or additional sources of information on model parameters. Information on the relationship between encounter probabilities, sources of additional information, and the reliability of density estimates, is rare but crucial to assessing reliability of SCR-based estimates. We used a simulation-based approach that incorporated prior empirical work to assess the accuracy and precision of density estimates from SCR models using spatially unstructured sampling. To assess the consequences of sparse data and potential sources of bias, we simulated data under six scenarios corresponding to three different levels of search effort and two levels of correlation between search effort and animal density. We then estimated density for each scenario using four models that included increasing amounts of information from harvested individuals and telemetry to evaluate the impact of additional sources of information. Model results were sensitive to the quantity of available information: density estimates based on low search effort were biased high and imprecise, whereas estimates based on high search effort were unbiased and precise. A correlation between search effort and animal density resulted in a positive bias in density estimates, though the bias decreased with increasingly informative datasets. Adding information from harvested individuals and telemetered individuals improved density estimates based on low and moderate effort but had negligible impact for datasets resulting from high effort. We demonstrated that density estimates from SCR models using spatially unstructured sampling are reliable when sufficient information is provided. Accurate density estimates can result if empirical-based simulations such as those presented here are used to develop study designs with appropriate amounts of effort and information sources. Public Library of Science 2019-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6474654/ /pubmed/31002709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215458 Text en © 2019 Paterson et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paterson, J. Terrill Proffitt, Kelly Jimenez, Ben Rotella, Jay Garrott, Robert Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions |
title | Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions |
title_full | Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions |
title_fullStr | Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions |
title_short | Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions |
title_sort | simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: a case study using mountain lions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31002709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patersonjterrill simulationbasedvalidationofspatialcapturerecapturemodelsacasestudyusingmountainlions AT proffittkelly simulationbasedvalidationofspatialcapturerecapturemodelsacasestudyusingmountainlions AT jimenezben simulationbasedvalidationofspatialcapturerecapturemodelsacasestudyusingmountainlions AT rotellajay simulationbasedvalidationofspatialcapturerecapturemodelsacasestudyusingmountainlions AT garrottrobert simulationbasedvalidationofspatialcapturerecapturemodelsacasestudyusingmountainlions |