Cargando…

Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND: An estimated 2%–3% of the population harbour an intracranial aneurysm. Concomitant atherosclerotic cervical carotid disease is not uncommon. The management of these two entities remains a challenge within the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a single case of concomitant carotid stenos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos, Jessica K, Lin, Li-Mei, Beaty, Narlin B, Bender, Matthew T, Jiang, Bowen, Zarrin, David A, Coon, Alexander L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31105978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000187
_version_ 1783412709873680384
author Campos, Jessica K
Lin, Li-Mei
Beaty, Narlin B
Bender, Matthew T
Jiang, Bowen
Zarrin, David A
Coon, Alexander L
author_facet Campos, Jessica K
Lin, Li-Mei
Beaty, Narlin B
Bender, Matthew T
Jiang, Bowen
Zarrin, David A
Coon, Alexander L
author_sort Campos, Jessica K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An estimated 2%–3% of the population harbour an intracranial aneurysm. Concomitant atherosclerotic cervical carotid disease is not uncommon. The management of these two entities remains a challenge within the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a single case of concomitant carotid stenosis and two ipsilateral unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with a single-staged cervical carotid stenting and cerebral aneurysm embolisation with the Pipeline embolisation device. DISCUSSION: No consensus currently exists to guide endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms associated with asymptomatic ipsilateral stenosis. Here, we present a case of asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis with two ipsilateral intracranial aneurysms and suggest carotid artery stenting takes procedural priority over aneurysm embolisation in single-stage treatment. The rationale for the sequence of neurointerventions is based on the tracking a robust distal access system beyond a stenotic proximal carotid lesion and stabilisation of the ulcerated plaque to avoid thromboembolic complications associated with plaque irritation during aneurysm embolisation. Additional cases and longer follow-up will be needed to further assess the efficacy of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64750852019-05-17 Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms Campos, Jessica K Lin, Li-Mei Beaty, Narlin B Bender, Matthew T Jiang, Bowen Zarrin, David A Coon, Alexander L Stroke Vasc Neurol Brief Report BACKGROUND: An estimated 2%–3% of the population harbour an intracranial aneurysm. Concomitant atherosclerotic cervical carotid disease is not uncommon. The management of these two entities remains a challenge within the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a single case of concomitant carotid stenosis and two ipsilateral unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with a single-staged cervical carotid stenting and cerebral aneurysm embolisation with the Pipeline embolisation device. DISCUSSION: No consensus currently exists to guide endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms associated with asymptomatic ipsilateral stenosis. Here, we present a case of asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis with two ipsilateral intracranial aneurysms and suggest carotid artery stenting takes procedural priority over aneurysm embolisation in single-stage treatment. The rationale for the sequence of neurointerventions is based on the tracking a robust distal access system beyond a stenotic proximal carotid lesion and stabilisation of the ulcerated plaque to avoid thromboembolic complications associated with plaque irritation during aneurysm embolisation. Additional cases and longer follow-up will be needed to further assess the efficacy of this technique. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6475085/ /pubmed/31105978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000187 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Brief Report
Campos, Jessica K
Lin, Li-Mei
Beaty, Narlin B
Bender, Matthew T
Jiang, Bowen
Zarrin, David A
Coon, Alexander L
Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
title Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
title_full Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
title_fullStr Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
title_full_unstemmed Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
title_short Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
title_sort tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31105978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000187
work_keys_str_mv AT camposjessicak tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms
AT linlimei tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms
AT beatynarlinb tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms
AT bendermatthewt tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms
AT jiangbowen tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms
AT zarrindavida tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms
AT coonalexanderl tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms