Cargando…
Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms
BACKGROUND: An estimated 2%–3% of the population harbour an intracranial aneurysm. Concomitant atherosclerotic cervical carotid disease is not uncommon. The management of these two entities remains a challenge within the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a single case of concomitant carotid stenos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31105978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000187 |
_version_ | 1783412709873680384 |
---|---|
author | Campos, Jessica K Lin, Li-Mei Beaty, Narlin B Bender, Matthew T Jiang, Bowen Zarrin, David A Coon, Alexander L |
author_facet | Campos, Jessica K Lin, Li-Mei Beaty, Narlin B Bender, Matthew T Jiang, Bowen Zarrin, David A Coon, Alexander L |
author_sort | Campos, Jessica K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An estimated 2%–3% of the population harbour an intracranial aneurysm. Concomitant atherosclerotic cervical carotid disease is not uncommon. The management of these two entities remains a challenge within the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a single case of concomitant carotid stenosis and two ipsilateral unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with a single-staged cervical carotid stenting and cerebral aneurysm embolisation with the Pipeline embolisation device. DISCUSSION: No consensus currently exists to guide endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms associated with asymptomatic ipsilateral stenosis. Here, we present a case of asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis with two ipsilateral intracranial aneurysms and suggest carotid artery stenting takes procedural priority over aneurysm embolisation in single-stage treatment. The rationale for the sequence of neurointerventions is based on the tracking a robust distal access system beyond a stenotic proximal carotid lesion and stabilisation of the ulcerated plaque to avoid thromboembolic complications associated with plaque irritation during aneurysm embolisation. Additional cases and longer follow-up will be needed to further assess the efficacy of this technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6475085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64750852019-05-17 Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms Campos, Jessica K Lin, Li-Mei Beaty, Narlin B Bender, Matthew T Jiang, Bowen Zarrin, David A Coon, Alexander L Stroke Vasc Neurol Brief Report BACKGROUND: An estimated 2%–3% of the population harbour an intracranial aneurysm. Concomitant atherosclerotic cervical carotid disease is not uncommon. The management of these two entities remains a challenge within the field. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a single case of concomitant carotid stenosis and two ipsilateral unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with a single-staged cervical carotid stenting and cerebral aneurysm embolisation with the Pipeline embolisation device. DISCUSSION: No consensus currently exists to guide endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms associated with asymptomatic ipsilateral stenosis. Here, we present a case of asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis with two ipsilateral intracranial aneurysms and suggest carotid artery stenting takes procedural priority over aneurysm embolisation in single-stage treatment. The rationale for the sequence of neurointerventions is based on the tracking a robust distal access system beyond a stenotic proximal carotid lesion and stabilisation of the ulcerated plaque to avoid thromboembolic complications associated with plaque irritation during aneurysm embolisation. Additional cases and longer follow-up will be needed to further assess the efficacy of this technique. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6475085/ /pubmed/31105978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000187 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Campos, Jessica K Lin, Li-Mei Beaty, Narlin B Bender, Matthew T Jiang, Bowen Zarrin, David A Coon, Alexander L Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
title | Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
title_full | Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
title_fullStr | Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
title_full_unstemmed | Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
title_short | Tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
title_sort | tandem cervical carotid stenting for stenosis with flow diversion embolisation for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31105978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/svn-2018-000187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camposjessicak tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms AT linlimei tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms AT beatynarlinb tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms AT bendermatthewt tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms AT jiangbowen tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms AT zarrindavida tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms AT coonalexanderl tandemcervicalcarotidstentingforstenosiswithflowdiversionembolisationforthetreatmentofintracranialaneurysms |