Cargando…

The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE: Stroke-survivors are at increased risk of future dementia. Assessment to identify those at high risk of developing a disease using predictive scores has been utilised in different areas of medicine. A number of risk assessment scores for dementia have been developed but none has been reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Eugene, Exley, Catherine, Price, Christopher, Stephan, Blossom, Robinson, Louise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025586
_version_ 1783412720170696704
author Tang, Eugene
Exley, Catherine
Price, Christopher
Stephan, Blossom
Robinson, Louise
author_facet Tang, Eugene
Exley, Catherine
Price, Christopher
Stephan, Blossom
Robinson, Louise
author_sort Tang, Eugene
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Stroke-survivors are at increased risk of future dementia. Assessment to identify those at high risk of developing a disease using predictive scores has been utilised in different areas of medicine. A number of risk assessment scores for dementia have been developed but none has been recommended for use clinically. The aim of this qualitative study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of using a risk assessment tool to predict post-stroke dementia. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. The patients and carers were offered interviews at around 6 (baseline) and 12 (follow-up) months post-stroke; clinicians were interviewed once. SETTING: The study was conducted in the North-East of England with stroke patients, family carers and healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine interviews were conducted (17 clinicians and 15 stroke patients and their carers at baseline. Twelve stroke patients and their carers were interviewed at follow-up, some interviews were conducted in pairs). RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators to risk assessment were discussed. For the patients and carers the focus for facilitators were based on the outcomes of risk assessment for example assistance with preparation, diagnosis and for reassurance. For clinicians, facilitators were focused on the process that is, familiarity in primary care, resource availability in secondary care and collaborative care. For barriers, both groups focused on the outcome including for example, the anxiety generated from a potential diagnosis of dementia. For the patients/carers a further barrier included concerns about how it may affect their recovery. For clinicians there were concerns about limited interventions and how it would be different from standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Risk assessment for dementia post-stroke presents challenges given the ramifications of a potential diagnosis of dementia. Attention needs to be given to how information is communicated and strategies developed to support the patients and carers if risk assessment is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64751392019-05-07 The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study Tang, Eugene Exley, Catherine Price, Christopher Stephan, Blossom Robinson, Louise BMJ Open Qualitative Research OBJECTIVE: Stroke-survivors are at increased risk of future dementia. Assessment to identify those at high risk of developing a disease using predictive scores has been utilised in different areas of medicine. A number of risk assessment scores for dementia have been developed but none has been recommended for use clinically. The aim of this qualitative study was to assess the acceptability and feasibility of using a risk assessment tool to predict post-stroke dementia. DESIGN: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed thematically. The patients and carers were offered interviews at around 6 (baseline) and 12 (follow-up) months post-stroke; clinicians were interviewed once. SETTING: The study was conducted in the North-East of England with stroke patients, family carers and healthcare professionals in primary and secondary care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine interviews were conducted (17 clinicians and 15 stroke patients and their carers at baseline. Twelve stroke patients and their carers were interviewed at follow-up, some interviews were conducted in pairs). RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators to risk assessment were discussed. For the patients and carers the focus for facilitators were based on the outcomes of risk assessment for example assistance with preparation, diagnosis and for reassurance. For clinicians, facilitators were focused on the process that is, familiarity in primary care, resource availability in secondary care and collaborative care. For barriers, both groups focused on the outcome including for example, the anxiety generated from a potential diagnosis of dementia. For the patients/carers a further barrier included concerns about how it may affect their recovery. For clinicians there were concerns about limited interventions and how it would be different from standard care. CONCLUSIONS: Risk assessment for dementia post-stroke presents challenges given the ramifications of a potential diagnosis of dementia. Attention needs to be given to how information is communicated and strategies developed to support the patients and carers if risk assessment is used. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6475139/ /pubmed/30918033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025586 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Qualitative Research
Tang, Eugene
Exley, Catherine
Price, Christopher
Stephan, Blossom
Robinson, Louise
The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
title The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
title_full The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
title_fullStr The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
title_short The views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
title_sort views of public and clinician stakeholders on risk assessment tools for post-stroke dementia: a qualitative study
topic Qualitative Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025586
work_keys_str_mv AT tangeugene theviewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT exleycatherine theviewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT pricechristopher theviewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT stephanblossom theviewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT robinsonlouise theviewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT tangeugene viewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT exleycatherine viewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT pricechristopher viewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT stephanblossom viewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy
AT robinsonlouise viewsofpublicandclinicianstakeholdersonriskassessmenttoolsforpoststrokedementiaaqualitativestudy