Cargando…

Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) develop pain education materials in Nepali and (2) determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised clinical trial (RCT) of a pain education intervention using these materials in Nepal. DESIGN: A two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, feasibility RCT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Saurab, Jensen, Mark P, Moseley, G Lorimer, Abbott, J Haxby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026874
_version_ 1783412728187060224
author Sharma, Saurab
Jensen, Mark P
Moseley, G Lorimer
Abbott, J Haxby
author_facet Sharma, Saurab
Jensen, Mark P
Moseley, G Lorimer
Abbott, J Haxby
author_sort Sharma, Saurab
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) develop pain education materials in Nepali and (2) determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised clinical trial (RCT) of a pain education intervention using these materials in Nepal. DESIGN: A two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, feasibility RCT. SETTING: A rehabilitation hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Forty Nepalese with non-specific low back pain (mean [SD] age 41 [14] years; 12 [30%] women). INTERVENTIONS: Eligible participants were randomised, by concealed, 1:1 allocation, to one of two groups: (1) a pain education intervention and (2) a guideline-based physiotherapy active control group intervention. Each intervention was delivered by a physiotherapist in a single, 1-hour, individualised treatment session. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, feasibility and blinding of outcome assessments, fidelity of treatment delivery, credibility of, and satisfaction with, treatment. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1 week post-treatment. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity, pain interference, pain catastrophising, sleep disturbance, resilience, global rating of change, depression and quality of life. Statistical analyses were conducted blind to group allocation. RESULTS: Forty participants were recruited. Thirty-eight participants (95%) completed the 1-week post-treatment assessment. Most primary outcomes surpassed the a priori thresholds for feasibility. Several findings have important implications for designing a full trial. Secondary analyses suggest clinical benefit of pain education over the control intervention, with larger decrease in pain intensity (mean difference=3.56 [95% CI 0.21 to 6.91]) and pain catastrophising (mean difference=6.16 [95% CI 0.59 to 11.72]) in the pain education group. Pain intensity would seem an appropriate outcome for a full clinical trial. One minor adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a full RCT of pain education for back pain in Nepal is feasible and warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03387228; Results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64751742019-05-07 Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial Sharma, Saurab Jensen, Mark P Moseley, G Lorimer Abbott, J Haxby BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to: (1) develop pain education materials in Nepali and (2) determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised clinical trial (RCT) of a pain education intervention using these materials in Nepal. DESIGN: A two-arm, parallel, assessor-blinded, feasibility RCT. SETTING: A rehabilitation hospital in Kathmandu, Nepal. PARTICIPANTS: Forty Nepalese with non-specific low back pain (mean [SD] age 41 [14] years; 12 [30%] women). INTERVENTIONS: Eligible participants were randomised, by concealed, 1:1 allocation, to one of two groups: (1) a pain education intervention and (2) a guideline-based physiotherapy active control group intervention. Each intervention was delivered by a physiotherapist in a single, 1-hour, individualised treatment session. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were related to feasibility: recruitment, retention and treatment adherence of participants, feasibility and blinding of outcome assessments, fidelity of treatment delivery, credibility of, and satisfaction with, treatment. Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1 week post-treatment. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain intensity, pain interference, pain catastrophising, sleep disturbance, resilience, global rating of change, depression and quality of life. Statistical analyses were conducted blind to group allocation. RESULTS: Forty participants were recruited. Thirty-eight participants (95%) completed the 1-week post-treatment assessment. Most primary outcomes surpassed the a priori thresholds for feasibility. Several findings have important implications for designing a full trial. Secondary analyses suggest clinical benefit of pain education over the control intervention, with larger decrease in pain intensity (mean difference=3.56 [95% CI 0.21 to 6.91]) and pain catastrophising (mean difference=6.16 [95% CI 0.59 to 11.72]) in the pain education group. Pain intensity would seem an appropriate outcome for a full clinical trial. One minor adverse event was reported. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a full RCT of pain education for back pain in Nepal is feasible and warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03387228; Results. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6475174/ /pubmed/30918037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026874 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Sharma, Saurab
Jensen, Mark P
Moseley, G Lorimer
Abbott, J Haxby
Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial
title Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial
title_full Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial
title_fullStr Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial
title_full_unstemmed Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial
title_short Results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in Nepal: the Pain Education in Nepal-Low Back Pain (PEN-LBP) feasibility trial
title_sort results of a feasibility randomised clinical trial on pain education for low back pain in nepal: the pain education in nepal-low back pain (pen-lbp) feasibility trial
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30918037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026874
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmasaurab resultsofafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialonpaineducationforlowbackpaininnepalthepaineducationinnepallowbackpainpenlbpfeasibilitytrial
AT jensenmarkp resultsofafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialonpaineducationforlowbackpaininnepalthepaineducationinnepallowbackpainpenlbpfeasibilitytrial
AT moseleyglorimer resultsofafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialonpaineducationforlowbackpaininnepalthepaineducationinnepallowbackpainpenlbpfeasibilitytrial
AT abbottjhaxby resultsofafeasibilityrandomisedclinicaltrialonpaineducationforlowbackpaininnepalthepaineducationinnepallowbackpainpenlbpfeasibilitytrial