Cargando…

Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVE: To assess health informatics (HI) training in UK postgraduate medical education, across all specialties, against international standards in the context of UK digital health initiatives (eg, Health Data Research UK, National Health Service Digital Academy and Global Digital Exemplars). DES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jidkov, Lydia, Alexander, Matthew, Bark, Pippa, Williams, John G, Kay, Jonathan, Taylor, Paul, Hemingway, Harry, Banerjee, Amitava
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025460
_version_ 1783412735409651712
author Jidkov, Lydia
Alexander, Matthew
Bark, Pippa
Williams, John G
Kay, Jonathan
Taylor, Paul
Hemingway, Harry
Banerjee, Amitava
author_facet Jidkov, Lydia
Alexander, Matthew
Bark, Pippa
Williams, John G
Kay, Jonathan
Taylor, Paul
Hemingway, Harry
Banerjee, Amitava
author_sort Jidkov, Lydia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess health informatics (HI) training in UK postgraduate medical education, across all specialties, against international standards in the context of UK digital health initiatives (eg, Health Data Research UK, National Health Service Digital Academy and Global Digital Exemplars). DESIGN: A mixed methods study of UK postgraduate clinician training curricula (71 specialties) against international HI standards: scoping review, curricular content analysis and expert consultation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A scoping literature review (PubMed until March 2017) informed development of a contemporary framework of HI competency domains for doctors. National training curricula for 71 postgraduate medical specialties were obtained from the UK General Medical Council and were analysed. Seven UK HI experts were consulted regarding findings. OUTCOMES: The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Recommendations for Biomedical and Health Informatics Education were used to develop a framework of competency domains. The number (maximum 50) of HI competency domains included in each of the 71 UK postgraduate medical specialties was investigated. After expert review, a universal HI competency framework was proposed. RESULTS: A framework of 50 HI competency domains was developed using 21 curricula from a scoping review, curricular content analysis and expert consultation. All 71 UK postgraduate medical curricula documents were mapped across 29 of 50 framework domains; that is, 21 domains were unrepresented. Curricula mapped between 0 (child and adolescent psychiatry and core surgical training) and 16 (chemical pathology and paediatric and perinatal pathology) of the 50 domains (median=7). Expert consultation found that HI competencies should be universal and integrated with existing competencies for UK clinicians and were under-represented in current curricula. Additional universal HI competencies were identified, including information governance and security and secondary use of data. CONCLUSIONS: Postgraduate medical education in the UK neglects HI competencies set out by international standards. Key HI competencies need to be urgently integrated into training curricula to prepare doctors for work in increasingly digitised healthcare environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64752112019-05-07 Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study Jidkov, Lydia Alexander, Matthew Bark, Pippa Williams, John G Kay, Jonathan Taylor, Paul Hemingway, Harry Banerjee, Amitava BMJ Open Health Informatics OBJECTIVE: To assess health informatics (HI) training in UK postgraduate medical education, across all specialties, against international standards in the context of UK digital health initiatives (eg, Health Data Research UK, National Health Service Digital Academy and Global Digital Exemplars). DESIGN: A mixed methods study of UK postgraduate clinician training curricula (71 specialties) against international HI standards: scoping review, curricular content analysis and expert consultation. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A scoping literature review (PubMed until March 2017) informed development of a contemporary framework of HI competency domains for doctors. National training curricula for 71 postgraduate medical specialties were obtained from the UK General Medical Council and were analysed. Seven UK HI experts were consulted regarding findings. OUTCOMES: The International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Recommendations for Biomedical and Health Informatics Education were used to develop a framework of competency domains. The number (maximum 50) of HI competency domains included in each of the 71 UK postgraduate medical specialties was investigated. After expert review, a universal HI competency framework was proposed. RESULTS: A framework of 50 HI competency domains was developed using 21 curricula from a scoping review, curricular content analysis and expert consultation. All 71 UK postgraduate medical curricula documents were mapped across 29 of 50 framework domains; that is, 21 domains were unrepresented. Curricula mapped between 0 (child and adolescent psychiatry and core surgical training) and 16 (chemical pathology and paediatric and perinatal pathology) of the 50 domains (median=7). Expert consultation found that HI competencies should be universal and integrated with existing competencies for UK clinicians and were under-represented in current curricula. Additional universal HI competencies were identified, including information governance and security and secondary use of data. CONCLUSIONS: Postgraduate medical education in the UK neglects HI competencies set out by international standards. Key HI competencies need to be urgently integrated into training curricula to prepare doctors for work in increasingly digitised healthcare environments. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6475211/ /pubmed/30928942 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025460 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Informatics
Jidkov, Lydia
Alexander, Matthew
Bark, Pippa
Williams, John G
Kay, Jonathan
Taylor, Paul
Hemingway, Harry
Banerjee, Amitava
Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study
title Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_full Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_short Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study
title_sort health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the uk: a mixed methods study
topic Health Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928942
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025460
work_keys_str_mv AT jidkovlydia healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT alexandermatthew healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT barkpippa healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT williamsjohng healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT kayjonathan healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT taylorpaul healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT hemingwayharry healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT banerjeeamitava healthinformaticscompetenciesinpostgraduatemedicaleducationandtrainingintheukamixedmethodsstudy