Cargando…

Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice

OBJECTIVES: To explore older people’s perspectives and experiences with shared decision-making (SDM) about medication for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews with 30 general practice patients aged 75 years and older in New South Wales...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansen, Jesse, McKinn, Shannon, Bonner, Carissa, Muscat, Danielle Marie, Doust, Jenny, McCaffery, Kirsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30898831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026342
_version_ 1783412736804257792
author Jansen, Jesse
McKinn, Shannon
Bonner, Carissa
Muscat, Danielle Marie
Doust, Jenny
McCaffery, Kirsten
author_facet Jansen, Jesse
McKinn, Shannon
Bonner, Carissa
Muscat, Danielle Marie
Doust, Jenny
McCaffery, Kirsten
author_sort Jansen, Jesse
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore older people’s perspectives and experiences with shared decision-making (SDM) about medication for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews with 30 general practice patients aged 75 years and older in New South Wales, Australia, who had elevated CVD risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol) or had received CVD-related lifestyle advice. Data were analysed by multiple researchers using Framework analysis. RESULTS: Twenty eight participants out of 30 were on CVD prevention medication, half with established CVD. We outlined patient experiences using the four steps of the SDM process, identifying key barriers and challenges: Step 1. Choice awareness: taking medication for CVD prevention was generally not recognised as a decision requiring patient input; Step 2. Discuss benefits/harms options: CVD prevention poorly understood with emphasis on benefits; Step 3. Explore preferences: goals, values and preferences (eg, length of life vs quality of life, reducing disease burden vs risk reduction) varied widely but generally not discussed with the general practitioner; Step 4. Making the decision: overall preference for directive approach, but some patients wanted more active involvement. Themes were similar across primary and secondary CVD prevention, different levels of self-reported health and people on and off medication. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate how older participants vary widely in their health goals and preferences for treatment outcomes, suggesting that CVD prevention decisions are preference sensitive. Combined with the fact that the vast majority of participants were taking medications, and few understood the aims and potential benefits and harms of CVD prevention, it seems that older patients are not always making an informed decision. Our findings highlight potentially modifiable barriers to greater participation of older people in SDM about CVD prevention medication and prevention in general.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64752172019-05-07 Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice Jansen, Jesse McKinn, Shannon Bonner, Carissa Muscat, Danielle Marie Doust, Jenny McCaffery, Kirsten BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine OBJECTIVES: To explore older people’s perspectives and experiences with shared decision-making (SDM) about medication for cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews with 30 general practice patients aged 75 years and older in New South Wales, Australia, who had elevated CVD risk factors (blood pressure, cholesterol) or had received CVD-related lifestyle advice. Data were analysed by multiple researchers using Framework analysis. RESULTS: Twenty eight participants out of 30 were on CVD prevention medication, half with established CVD. We outlined patient experiences using the four steps of the SDM process, identifying key barriers and challenges: Step 1. Choice awareness: taking medication for CVD prevention was generally not recognised as a decision requiring patient input; Step 2. Discuss benefits/harms options: CVD prevention poorly understood with emphasis on benefits; Step 3. Explore preferences: goals, values and preferences (eg, length of life vs quality of life, reducing disease burden vs risk reduction) varied widely but generally not discussed with the general practitioner; Step 4. Making the decision: overall preference for directive approach, but some patients wanted more active involvement. Themes were similar across primary and secondary CVD prevention, different levels of self-reported health and people on and off medication. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate how older participants vary widely in their health goals and preferences for treatment outcomes, suggesting that CVD prevention decisions are preference sensitive. Combined with the fact that the vast majority of participants were taking medications, and few understood the aims and potential benefits and harms of CVD prevention, it seems that older patients are not always making an informed decision. Our findings highlight potentially modifiable barriers to greater participation of older people in SDM about CVD prevention medication and prevention in general. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6475217/ /pubmed/30898831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026342 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Jansen, Jesse
McKinn, Shannon
Bonner, Carissa
Muscat, Danielle Marie
Doust, Jenny
McCaffery, Kirsten
Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
title Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
title_full Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
title_fullStr Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
title_short Shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
title_sort shared decision-making about cardiovascular disease medication in older people: a qualitative study of patient experiences in general practice
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30898831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026342
work_keys_str_mv AT jansenjesse shareddecisionmakingaboutcardiovasculardiseasemedicationinolderpeopleaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesingeneralpractice
AT mckinnshannon shareddecisionmakingaboutcardiovasculardiseasemedicationinolderpeopleaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesingeneralpractice
AT bonnercarissa shareddecisionmakingaboutcardiovasculardiseasemedicationinolderpeopleaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesingeneralpractice
AT muscatdaniellemarie shareddecisionmakingaboutcardiovasculardiseasemedicationinolderpeopleaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesingeneralpractice
AT doustjenny shareddecisionmakingaboutcardiovasculardiseasemedicationinolderpeopleaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesingeneralpractice
AT mccafferykirsten shareddecisionmakingaboutcardiovasculardiseasemedicationinolderpeopleaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesingeneralpractice