Cargando…

Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bevan, David, White, Alicia, Marshall, John, Peckham, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324
_version_ 1783412737739587584
author Bevan, David
White, Alicia
Marshall, John
Peckham, Catherine
author_facet Bevan, David
White, Alicia
Marshall, John
Peckham, Catherine
author_sort Bevan, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters. DESIGN: Deterministic model using a consensus approach for the selection of input parameters. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A theoretical annual cohort of 711 999 live births in the UK (excluding births by elective caesarean section). INTERVENTIONS: Culture-based screening for GBS at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy added to the recommended risk-based prevention policy in place on the date of modelling. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes assessed included use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), early onset GBS (EOGBS), EOGBS mortality, severe EOGBS-related morbidity and maternal penicillin anaphylaxis. RESULTS: With no prophylaxis strategy, the model estimated that there would be 421 cases of culture positive EOGBS in a year (0.59/1000 live births). In the risk-based prophylaxis scenario, 30 666 women were estimated to receive IAP and 70 cases of EOGBS were prevented. Addition of screening resulted in a further 96 260 women receiving IAP and the prevention of an additional 52 to 57 cases of EOGBS. This resulted in the prevention of three EOGBS deaths and four cases of severe disability. With screening, an additional 1675 to 1854 women receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS case and 24 065 to 32 087 receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS death. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base available for a broad range of model input parameters was limited, leading to uncertainty in the estimates produced by the model. Where data was limited, the model input parameters were agreed with the multidisciplinary stakeholder group, the first time this has been done to our knowledge. The main impact of screening is likely to be on the large group of low-risk women where the clinical impact of EOGBS tends to be less severe. This model suggests that the reduction in mortality and severe disability due to EOGBS with antenatal GBS screening is likely to be very limited, with a high rate of overdetection and overuse of antibiotics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64752212019-05-07 Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK Bevan, David White, Alicia Marshall, John Peckham, Catherine BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVES: To estimate the potential impact of the addition of culture-based screening for group B streptococcus (GBS) carriage in pregnancy to a risk-based prevention policy in the UK. We aimed to establish agreement within a multidisciplinary group of key stakeholders on the model input parameters. DESIGN: Deterministic model using a consensus approach for the selection of input parameters. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A theoretical annual cohort of 711 999 live births in the UK (excluding births by elective caesarean section). INTERVENTIONS: Culture-based screening for GBS at 35–37 weeks of pregnancy added to the recommended risk-based prevention policy in place on the date of modelling. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes assessed included use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), early onset GBS (EOGBS), EOGBS mortality, severe EOGBS-related morbidity and maternal penicillin anaphylaxis. RESULTS: With no prophylaxis strategy, the model estimated that there would be 421 cases of culture positive EOGBS in a year (0.59/1000 live births). In the risk-based prophylaxis scenario, 30 666 women were estimated to receive IAP and 70 cases of EOGBS were prevented. Addition of screening resulted in a further 96 260 women receiving IAP and the prevention of an additional 52 to 57 cases of EOGBS. This resulted in the prevention of three EOGBS deaths and four cases of severe disability. With screening, an additional 1675 to 1854 women receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS case and 24 065 to 32 087 receive IAP to prevent one EOGBS death. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base available for a broad range of model input parameters was limited, leading to uncertainty in the estimates produced by the model. Where data was limited, the model input parameters were agreed with the multidisciplinary stakeholder group, the first time this has been done to our knowledge. The main impact of screening is likely to be on the large group of low-risk women where the clinical impact of EOGBS tends to be less severe. This model suggests that the reduction in mortality and severe disability due to EOGBS with antenatal GBS screening is likely to be very limited, with a high rate of overdetection and overuse of antibiotics. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6475221/ /pubmed/30904850 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Bevan, David
White, Alicia
Marshall, John
Peckham, Catherine
Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
title Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
title_full Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
title_fullStr Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
title_full_unstemmed Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
title_short Modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) carriage in the UK
title_sort modelling the effect of the introduction of antenatal screening for group b streptococcus (gbs) carriage in the uk
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024324
work_keys_str_mv AT bevandavid modellingtheeffectoftheintroductionofantenatalscreeningforgroupbstreptococcusgbscarriageintheuk
AT whitealicia modellingtheeffectoftheintroductionofantenatalscreeningforgroupbstreptococcusgbscarriageintheuk
AT marshalljohn modellingtheeffectoftheintroductionofantenatalscreeningforgroupbstreptococcusgbscarriageintheuk
AT peckhamcatherine modellingtheeffectoftheintroductionofantenatalscreeningforgroupbstreptococcusgbscarriageintheuk