Cargando…
Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models
OBJECTIVES: Effective researcher assessment is key to decisions about funding allocations, promotion and tenure. We aimed to identify what is known about methods for assessing researcher achievements, leading to a new composite assessment model. DESIGN: We systematically reviewed the literature via...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025320 |
_version_ | 1783412749927186432 |
---|---|
author | Braithwaite, Jeffrey Herkes, Jessica Churruca, Kate Long, Janet C Pomare, Chiara Boyling, Claire Bierbaum, Mia Clay-Williams, Robyn Rapport, Frances Shih, Patti Hogden, Anne Ellis, Louise A Ludlow, Kristiana Austin, Elizabeth Seah, Rebecca McPherson, Elise Hibbert, Peter D Westbrook, Johanna |
author_facet | Braithwaite, Jeffrey Herkes, Jessica Churruca, Kate Long, Janet C Pomare, Chiara Boyling, Claire Bierbaum, Mia Clay-Williams, Robyn Rapport, Frances Shih, Patti Hogden, Anne Ellis, Louise A Ludlow, Kristiana Austin, Elizabeth Seah, Rebecca McPherson, Elise Hibbert, Peter D Westbrook, Johanna |
author_sort | Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Effective researcher assessment is key to decisions about funding allocations, promotion and tenure. We aimed to identify what is known about methods for assessing researcher achievements, leading to a new composite assessment model. DESIGN: We systematically reviewed the literature via the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols framework. DATA SOURCES: All Web of Science databases (including Core Collection, MEDLINE and BIOSIS Citation Index) to the end of 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: (1) English language, (2) published in the last 10 years (2007–2017), (3) full text was available and (4) the article discussed an approach to the assessment of an individual researcher’s achievements. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Articles were allocated among four pairs of reviewers for screening, with each pair randomly assigned 5% of their allocation to review concurrently against inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa (ĸ). The ĸ statistic showed agreement ranging from moderate to almost perfect (0.4848–0.9039). Following screening, selected articles underwent full-text review and bias was assessed. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-eight articles were included in the final review. Established approaches developed prior to our inclusion period (eg, citations and outputs, h-index and journal impact factor) remained dominant in the literature and in practice. New bibliometric methods and models emerged in the last 10 years including: measures based on PageRank algorithms or ‘altmetric’ data, methods to apply peer judgement and techniques to assign values to publication quantity and quality. Each assessment method tended to prioritise certain aspects of achievement over others. CONCLUSIONS: All metrics and models focus on an element or elements at the expense of others. A new composite design, the Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM), is presented, which supersedes past anachronistic models. The CRAM is modifiable to a range of applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6475357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64753572019-05-07 Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models Braithwaite, Jeffrey Herkes, Jessica Churruca, Kate Long, Janet C Pomare, Chiara Boyling, Claire Bierbaum, Mia Clay-Williams, Robyn Rapport, Frances Shih, Patti Hogden, Anne Ellis, Louise A Ludlow, Kristiana Austin, Elizabeth Seah, Rebecca McPherson, Elise Hibbert, Peter D Westbrook, Johanna BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVES: Effective researcher assessment is key to decisions about funding allocations, promotion and tenure. We aimed to identify what is known about methods for assessing researcher achievements, leading to a new composite assessment model. DESIGN: We systematically reviewed the literature via the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols framework. DATA SOURCES: All Web of Science databases (including Core Collection, MEDLINE and BIOSIS Citation Index) to the end of 2017. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: (1) English language, (2) published in the last 10 years (2007–2017), (3) full text was available and (4) the article discussed an approach to the assessment of an individual researcher’s achievements. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Articles were allocated among four pairs of reviewers for screening, with each pair randomly assigned 5% of their allocation to review concurrently against inclusion criteria. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa (ĸ). The ĸ statistic showed agreement ranging from moderate to almost perfect (0.4848–0.9039). Following screening, selected articles underwent full-text review and bias was assessed. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy-eight articles were included in the final review. Established approaches developed prior to our inclusion period (eg, citations and outputs, h-index and journal impact factor) remained dominant in the literature and in practice. New bibliometric methods and models emerged in the last 10 years including: measures based on PageRank algorithms or ‘altmetric’ data, methods to apply peer judgement and techniques to assign values to publication quantity and quality. Each assessment method tended to prioritise certain aspects of achievement over others. CONCLUSIONS: All metrics and models focus on an element or elements at the expense of others. A new composite design, the Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM), is presented, which supersedes past anachronistic models. The CRAM is modifiable to a range of applications. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6475357/ /pubmed/30928941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025320 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Braithwaite, Jeffrey Herkes, Jessica Churruca, Kate Long, Janet C Pomare, Chiara Boyling, Claire Bierbaum, Mia Clay-Williams, Robyn Rapport, Frances Shih, Patti Hogden, Anne Ellis, Louise A Ludlow, Kristiana Austin, Elizabeth Seah, Rebecca McPherson, Elise Hibbert, Peter D Westbrook, Johanna Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
title | Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
title_full | Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
title_fullStr | Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
title_full_unstemmed | Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
title_short | Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
title_sort | comprehensive researcher achievement model (cram): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braithwaitejeffrey comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT herkesjessica comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT churrucakate comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT longjanetc comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT pomarechiara comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT boylingclaire comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT bierbaummia comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT claywilliamsrobyn comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT rapportfrances comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT shihpatti comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT hogdenanne comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT ellislouisea comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT ludlowkristiana comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT austinelizabeth comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT seahrebecca comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT mcphersonelise comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT hibbertpeterd comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels AT westbrookjohanna comprehensiveresearcherachievementmodelcramaframeworkformeasuringresearcherachievementimpactandinfluencederivedfromasystematicliteraturereviewofmetricsandmodels |