Cargando…

How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners

OBJECTIVES: To understand approaches to priority setting for healthcare service resource allocation at an operational level in a nationally commissioned but regionally delivered service. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a Framework analysis. SETTING: National Health Serv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vernazza, Christopher Robert, Taylor, Greig, Donaldson, Cam, Gray, Joanne, Holmes, Richard, Carr, Katherine, Exley, Catherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024995
_version_ 1783412751322841088
author Vernazza, Christopher Robert
Taylor, Greig
Donaldson, Cam
Gray, Joanne
Holmes, Richard
Carr, Katherine
Exley, Catherine
author_facet Vernazza, Christopher Robert
Taylor, Greig
Donaldson, Cam
Gray, Joanne
Holmes, Richard
Carr, Katherine
Exley, Catherine
author_sort Vernazza, Christopher Robert
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To understand approaches to priority setting for healthcare service resource allocation at an operational level in a nationally commissioned but regionally delivered service. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a Framework analysis. SETTING: National Health Service dentistry commissioning teams within subregional offices in England. PARTICIPANTS: All 31 individuals holding the relevant role (dental lead commissioner in subregional offices) were approached directly and from this 14 participants were recruited, with 12 interviews completed. Both male and female genders and all regions were represented in the final sample. RESULTS: Three major themes arose. First, ‘Methods of priority setting and barriers to explicit approaches’ was a common theme, specifically identifying the main methods as: perpetuating historical allocations, pressure from politicians and clinicians and use of needs assessments while barriers were time and skill deficits, a lack of national guidance and an inflexible contracting arrangements stopping resource allocation. Second, ‘Relationships with key stakeholders and advisors’ were discussed, showing the important nature of relationships with clinical advisors but variation in the quality of these relationships was noted. Finally, ‘Tensions between national and local responsibilities’ were illustrated, where there was confusion about where power and autonomy lay. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioners recognised a need for resource allocation but relied on clinical advice and needs assessment in order to set priorities. More explicit priority setting was prevented by structure of the commissioning system and standard national contracts with providers. Further research is required to embed and simplify adoption of tools to aid priority setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64753632019-05-07 How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners Vernazza, Christopher Robert Taylor, Greig Donaldson, Cam Gray, Joanne Holmes, Richard Carr, Katherine Exley, Catherine BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: To understand approaches to priority setting for healthcare service resource allocation at an operational level in a nationally commissioned but regionally delivered service. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and a Framework analysis. SETTING: National Health Service dentistry commissioning teams within subregional offices in England. PARTICIPANTS: All 31 individuals holding the relevant role (dental lead commissioner in subregional offices) were approached directly and from this 14 participants were recruited, with 12 interviews completed. Both male and female genders and all regions were represented in the final sample. RESULTS: Three major themes arose. First, ‘Methods of priority setting and barriers to explicit approaches’ was a common theme, specifically identifying the main methods as: perpetuating historical allocations, pressure from politicians and clinicians and use of needs assessments while barriers were time and skill deficits, a lack of national guidance and an inflexible contracting arrangements stopping resource allocation. Second, ‘Relationships with key stakeholders and advisors’ were discussed, showing the important nature of relationships with clinical advisors but variation in the quality of these relationships was noted. Finally, ‘Tensions between national and local responsibilities’ were illustrated, where there was confusion about where power and autonomy lay. CONCLUSIONS: Commissioners recognised a need for resource allocation but relied on clinical advice and needs assessment in order to set priorities. More explicit priority setting was prevented by structure of the commissioning system and standard national contracts with providers. Further research is required to embed and simplify adoption of tools to aid priority setting. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6475363/ /pubmed/30904857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024995 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Economics
Vernazza, Christopher Robert
Taylor, Greig
Donaldson, Cam
Gray, Joanne
Holmes, Richard
Carr, Katherine
Exley, Catherine
How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners
title How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners
title_full How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners
title_fullStr How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners
title_full_unstemmed How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners
title_short How does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with NHS England dental commissioners
title_sort how does priority setting for resource allocation happen in commissioning dental services in a nationally led, regionally delivered system: a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with nhs england dental commissioners
topic Health Economics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30904857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024995
work_keys_str_mv AT vernazzachristopherrobert howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners
AT taylorgreig howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners
AT donaldsoncam howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners
AT grayjoanne howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners
AT holmesrichard howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners
AT carrkatherine howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners
AT exleycatherine howdoesprioritysettingforresourceallocationhappenincommissioningdentalservicesinanationallyledregionallydeliveredsystemaqualitativestudyusingsemistructuredinterviewswithnhsenglanddentalcommissioners