Cargando…

Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area

PURPOSE: Proximal femoral fractures involving both the subcapital area and the trochanteric or subtrochanteric area have rarely been reported, but they are not uncommon. However, few studies have reported the incidence or clinical outcomes of such fractures. This study investigated such fractures. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tani, Takayuki, Kijima, Hiroaki, Konishi, Natsuo, Kubota, Hitoshi, Yamada, Shin, Tazawa, Hiroshi, Suzuki, Norio, Kamo, Keiji, Okudera, Yoshihiko, Fujii, Masashi, Sasaki, Ken, Kawano, Tetsuya, Iwamoto, Yosuke, Nagahata, Itsuki, Miyakoshi, Naohisa, Shimada, Yoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1628683
_version_ 1783412771248930816
author Tani, Takayuki
Kijima, Hiroaki
Konishi, Natsuo
Kubota, Hitoshi
Yamada, Shin
Tazawa, Hiroshi
Suzuki, Norio
Kamo, Keiji
Okudera, Yoshihiko
Fujii, Masashi
Sasaki, Ken
Kawano, Tetsuya
Iwamoto, Yosuke
Nagahata, Itsuki
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Shimada, Yoichi
author_facet Tani, Takayuki
Kijima, Hiroaki
Konishi, Natsuo
Kubota, Hitoshi
Yamada, Shin
Tazawa, Hiroshi
Suzuki, Norio
Kamo, Keiji
Okudera, Yoshihiko
Fujii, Masashi
Sasaki, Ken
Kawano, Tetsuya
Iwamoto, Yosuke
Nagahata, Itsuki
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Shimada, Yoichi
author_sort Tani, Takayuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Proximal femoral fractures involving both the subcapital area and the trochanteric or subtrochanteric area have rarely been reported, but they are not uncommon. However, few studies have reported the incidence or clinical outcomes of such fractures. This study investigated such fractures. METHODS: In area classification, the proximal femur is divided into 4 areas by 3 boundary planes: the first plane is the center of femoral neck; the second plane is the border between femoral neck and femoral trochanter; and the third plane links the inferior borders of greater and lesser trochanters. A fracture only in the first area is classified as a Type 1 fracture; one in the first and second areas is classified as a Type 1-2 fracture. Therefore, proximal femoral fractures involving both the subcapital area and the trochanteric area are classified as Type 1-2-3, and those involving both the subcapital area and the subtrochanteric area are classified as Type 1-2-3-4. In this study, a total of 1042 femoral proximal fractures were classified by area classification, and the treatment methods and the failure rates were investigated only for Types 1-2-3 and 1-2-3-4 cases. The failure rate was defined as the incidence of internal fixator cut-out or telescoping >10 mm. RESULTS: Types 1-2-3 and 1-2-3-4 fractures accounted for 1.72%. Surgical treatment was performed for 89%. Of these, 56% underwent osteosynthesis, but the failure rate was 33%. The other patients (44%) underwent prosthetic replacement. Fracture lines of all these fractures were present along trochanteric fossa to intertrochanteric fossa in posterior aspect and just below the femoral head in anterior aspect. CONCLUSION: Fracture involving the subcapital area to the trochanteric or subtrochanteric area was found in approximately 2%. In patients for whom prosthetic replacement was selected, good results were obtained. However, 1/3 of patients who underwent osteosynthesis had poor results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6475566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64755662019-05-12 Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area Tani, Takayuki Kijima, Hiroaki Konishi, Natsuo Kubota, Hitoshi Yamada, Shin Tazawa, Hiroshi Suzuki, Norio Kamo, Keiji Okudera, Yoshihiko Fujii, Masashi Sasaki, Ken Kawano, Tetsuya Iwamoto, Yosuke Nagahata, Itsuki Miyakoshi, Naohisa Shimada, Yoichi Adv Orthop Research Article PURPOSE: Proximal femoral fractures involving both the subcapital area and the trochanteric or subtrochanteric area have rarely been reported, but they are not uncommon. However, few studies have reported the incidence or clinical outcomes of such fractures. This study investigated such fractures. METHODS: In area classification, the proximal femur is divided into 4 areas by 3 boundary planes: the first plane is the center of femoral neck; the second plane is the border between femoral neck and femoral trochanter; and the third plane links the inferior borders of greater and lesser trochanters. A fracture only in the first area is classified as a Type 1 fracture; one in the first and second areas is classified as a Type 1-2 fracture. Therefore, proximal femoral fractures involving both the subcapital area and the trochanteric area are classified as Type 1-2-3, and those involving both the subcapital area and the subtrochanteric area are classified as Type 1-2-3-4. In this study, a total of 1042 femoral proximal fractures were classified by area classification, and the treatment methods and the failure rates were investigated only for Types 1-2-3 and 1-2-3-4 cases. The failure rate was defined as the incidence of internal fixator cut-out or telescoping >10 mm. RESULTS: Types 1-2-3 and 1-2-3-4 fractures accounted for 1.72%. Surgical treatment was performed for 89%. Of these, 56% underwent osteosynthesis, but the failure rate was 33%. The other patients (44%) underwent prosthetic replacement. Fracture lines of all these fractures were present along trochanteric fossa to intertrochanteric fossa in posterior aspect and just below the femoral head in anterior aspect. CONCLUSION: Fracture involving the subcapital area to the trochanteric or subtrochanteric area was found in approximately 2%. In patients for whom prosthetic replacement was selected, good results were obtained. However, 1/3 of patients who underwent osteosynthesis had poor results. Hindawi 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6475566/ /pubmed/31080674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1628683 Text en Copyright © 2019 Takayuki Tani et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tani, Takayuki
Kijima, Hiroaki
Konishi, Natsuo
Kubota, Hitoshi
Yamada, Shin
Tazawa, Hiroshi
Suzuki, Norio
Kamo, Keiji
Okudera, Yoshihiko
Fujii, Masashi
Sasaki, Ken
Kawano, Tetsuya
Iwamoto, Yosuke
Nagahata, Itsuki
Miyakoshi, Naohisa
Shimada, Yoichi
Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area
title Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area
title_full Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area
title_fullStr Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area
title_full_unstemmed Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area
title_short Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Hip Fractures Involving Both the Subcapital Area and the Trochanteric or Subtrochanteric Area
title_sort incidence and clinical outcomes of hip fractures involving both the subcapital area and the trochanteric or subtrochanteric area
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6475566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31080674
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1628683
work_keys_str_mv AT tanitakayuki incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT kijimahiroaki incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT konishinatsuo incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT kubotahitoshi incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT yamadashin incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT tazawahiroshi incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT suzukinorio incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT kamokeiji incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT okuderayoshihiko incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT fujiimasashi incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT sasakiken incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT kawanotetsuya incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT iwamotoyosuke incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT nagahataitsuki incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT miyakoshinaohisa incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea
AT shimadayoichi incidenceandclinicaloutcomesofhipfracturesinvolvingboththesubcapitalareaandthetrochantericorsubtrochantericarea