Cargando…

Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery

PURPOSE: Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is important for macular hole (MH) surgery but may have secondary effects visible on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). We relate integrity of inner and outer macular layers with functional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faria, M. Y., Sousa, D. C., Mano, S., Marques, R., Ferreira, N. P., Fonseca, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1939523
_version_ 1783412846428684288
author Faria, M. Y.
Sousa, D. C.
Mano, S.
Marques, R.
Ferreira, N. P.
Fonseca, A.
author_facet Faria, M. Y.
Sousa, D. C.
Mano, S.
Marques, R.
Ferreira, N. P.
Fonseca, A.
author_sort Faria, M. Y.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is important for macular hole (MH) surgery but may have secondary effects visible on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). We relate integrity of inner and outer macular layers with functional results with mfERG. METHODS: Nonrandomized prospective study of 33 consecutive eyes of 33 patients with macular hole who underwent vitrectomy with ILM peeling. Best-corrected visual acuity was assessed, and integrity of external layers was measured using OCT. Each component of mfERG, N1 and P1 amplitude and latency, was also measured. RESULTS: All eyes showed macular hole closure. Visual acuity improved from 20/400 to 20/40 in the Snellen visual acuity chart (P < 0.001), and OCT external lines were intact in 19 eyes and disrupted in 14 eyes. Postoperatively, N1 and P1 amplitudes in ring 1 increased compared to preoperative values (P < 0.001 for both). Latency remained delayed for both N1 and P1 wave. In the group of 19 eyes with integrity of outer retinal layers, N1 amplitude in ring 1 was superior to the group of 14 patients with disrupted outer retinal layers (P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In macular hole surgery, structure analysis in OCT is one of the important outcomes for the retinal surgeon. Functional results are parallel with anatomic results, but visual gain is limited. The limited recovery in mfERG suggests an alteration of retinal physiology that could explain limited vision recover.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6476076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64760762019-05-14 Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery Faria, M. Y. Sousa, D. C. Mano, S. Marques, R. Ferreira, N. P. Fonseca, A. J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is important for macular hole (MH) surgery but may have secondary effects visible on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). We relate integrity of inner and outer macular layers with functional results with mfERG. METHODS: Nonrandomized prospective study of 33 consecutive eyes of 33 patients with macular hole who underwent vitrectomy with ILM peeling. Best-corrected visual acuity was assessed, and integrity of external layers was measured using OCT. Each component of mfERG, N1 and P1 amplitude and latency, was also measured. RESULTS: All eyes showed macular hole closure. Visual acuity improved from 20/400 to 20/40 in the Snellen visual acuity chart (P < 0.001), and OCT external lines were intact in 19 eyes and disrupted in 14 eyes. Postoperatively, N1 and P1 amplitudes in ring 1 increased compared to preoperative values (P < 0.001 for both). Latency remained delayed for both N1 and P1 wave. In the group of 19 eyes with integrity of outer retinal layers, N1 amplitude in ring 1 was superior to the group of 14 patients with disrupted outer retinal layers (P=0.042). CONCLUSIONS: In macular hole surgery, structure analysis in OCT is one of the important outcomes for the retinal surgeon. Functional results are parallel with anatomic results, but visual gain is limited. The limited recovery in mfERG suggests an alteration of retinal physiology that could explain limited vision recover. Hindawi 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6476076/ /pubmed/31089422 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1939523 Text en Copyright © 2019 M. Y. Faria et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Faria, M. Y.
Sousa, D. C.
Mano, S.
Marques, R.
Ferreira, N. P.
Fonseca, A.
Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery
title Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery
title_full Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery
title_fullStr Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery
title_short Multifocal Electroretinography in Assessment of Macular Function after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macular Hole Surgery
title_sort multifocal electroretinography in assessment of macular function after internal limiting membrane peeling in macular hole surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31089422
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1939523
work_keys_str_mv AT fariamy multifocalelectroretinographyinassessmentofmacularfunctionafterinternallimitingmembranepeelinginmacularholesurgery
AT sousadc multifocalelectroretinographyinassessmentofmacularfunctionafterinternallimitingmembranepeelinginmacularholesurgery
AT manos multifocalelectroretinographyinassessmentofmacularfunctionafterinternallimitingmembranepeelinginmacularholesurgery
AT marquesr multifocalelectroretinographyinassessmentofmacularfunctionafterinternallimitingmembranepeelinginmacularholesurgery
AT ferreiranp multifocalelectroretinographyinassessmentofmacularfunctionafterinternallimitingmembranepeelinginmacularholesurgery
AT fonsecaa multifocalelectroretinographyinassessmentofmacularfunctionafterinternallimitingmembranepeelinginmacularholesurgery