Cargando…

Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated various morphological and molecular response criteria in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) patient undergoing peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) with Lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) by using Gallium 68-PSMA positron-emissi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Manoj, Choudhury, Partha Sarathi, Rawal, Sudhir, Goel, Harish Chandra, Rao, Shriram Avinash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040600
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_111_18
_version_ 1783412865312489472
author Gupta, Manoj
Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
Rawal, Sudhir
Goel, Harish Chandra
Rao, Shriram Avinash
author_facet Gupta, Manoj
Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
Rawal, Sudhir
Goel, Harish Chandra
Rao, Shriram Avinash
author_sort Gupta, Manoj
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We evaluated various morphological and molecular response criteria in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) patient undergoing peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) with Lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) by using Gallium 68-PSMA positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (Ga68-PSMA PET-CT). METHODS: A total of 46 pre- and 8–12 weeks’ post-PRLT Ga68-PSMA PET-CT studies were reanalyzed (23 comparisons). Prostate-specific antigen drop of ≥50% and ≥25% increase was considered as partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD), respectively, for biochemical response (BR) while change in-between was considered as stable disease (SD). Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and MD Anderson (MDA) criteria for morphological response while PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0 (PERCIST 1.0) and European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) criteria for molecular response were used. Kappa coefficient was derived to see the level of agreement. RESULTS: The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by BR and RECIST criteria was 9 (39.13%), 3 (13.04%), and 11 (47.83%) and 5 (21.74%), 2 (8.70%), and 16 (69.57%), respectively. The proportion of PD, PR, and SD was same by PERCIST and EORTC criteria and which were 8 (34.78%), 5 (21.74%), and 10 (43.48%). The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by MDA criteria was 1 (4.35%), 1 (4.35%), and 21 (91.30%), respectively. Poor agreement between BR and both morphological criteria while a statistically significant agreement with both molecular criteria seen. CONCLUSION: We concluded that molecular criteria performed better than morphological criteria in response assessment by Ga68-PSMA PET-CT in metastatic castration resistant PCa patients undergoing PRLT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6476211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64762112019-04-30 Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography Gupta, Manoj Choudhury, Partha Sarathi Rawal, Sudhir Goel, Harish Chandra Rao, Shriram Avinash Urol Ann Original Article INTRODUCTION: We evaluated various morphological and molecular response criteria in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) patient undergoing peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRLT) with Lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) by using Gallium 68-PSMA positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (Ga68-PSMA PET-CT). METHODS: A total of 46 pre- and 8–12 weeks’ post-PRLT Ga68-PSMA PET-CT studies were reanalyzed (23 comparisons). Prostate-specific antigen drop of ≥50% and ≥25% increase was considered as partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD), respectively, for biochemical response (BR) while change in-between was considered as stable disease (SD). Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) and MD Anderson (MDA) criteria for morphological response while PET response criteria in solid tumors 1.0 (PERCIST 1.0) and European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC) criteria for molecular response were used. Kappa coefficient was derived to see the level of agreement. RESULTS: The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by BR and RECIST criteria was 9 (39.13%), 3 (13.04%), and 11 (47.83%) and 5 (21.74%), 2 (8.70%), and 16 (69.57%), respectively. The proportion of PD, PR, and SD was same by PERCIST and EORTC criteria and which were 8 (34.78%), 5 (21.74%), and 10 (43.48%). The proportion of PD, PR, and SD by MDA criteria was 1 (4.35%), 1 (4.35%), and 21 (91.30%), respectively. Poor agreement between BR and both morphological criteria while a statistically significant agreement with both molecular criteria seen. CONCLUSION: We concluded that molecular criteria performed better than morphological criteria in response assessment by Ga68-PSMA PET-CT in metastatic castration resistant PCa patients undergoing PRLT. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6476211/ /pubmed/31040600 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_111_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Manoj
Choudhury, Partha Sarathi
Rawal, Sudhir
Goel, Harish Chandra
Rao, Shriram Avinash
Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
title Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
title_full Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
title_fullStr Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
title_short Evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: A comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, European organization for research and treatment of cancer, and MDA criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
title_sort evaluation of response in patients of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer undergoing systemic radiotherapy with lutetium177-prostate-specific membrane antigen: a comparison between response evaluation criteria in solid tumors, positron-emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors, european organization for research and treatment of cancer, and mda criteria assessed by gallium 68-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography-computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040600
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_111_18
work_keys_str_mv AT guptamanoj evaluationofresponseinpatientsofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerundergoingsystemicradiotherapywithlutetium177prostatespecificmembraneantigenacomparisonbetweenresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumorspositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsol
AT choudhuryparthasarathi evaluationofresponseinpatientsofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerundergoingsystemicradiotherapywithlutetium177prostatespecificmembraneantigenacomparisonbetweenresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumorspositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsol
AT rawalsudhir evaluationofresponseinpatientsofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerundergoingsystemicradiotherapywithlutetium177prostatespecificmembraneantigenacomparisonbetweenresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumorspositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsol
AT goelharishchandra evaluationofresponseinpatientsofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerundergoingsystemicradiotherapywithlutetium177prostatespecificmembraneantigenacomparisonbetweenresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumorspositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsol
AT raoshriramavinash evaluationofresponseinpatientsofmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerundergoingsystemicradiotherapywithlutetium177prostatespecificmembraneantigenacomparisonbetweenresponseevaluationcriteriainsolidtumorspositronemissiontomographyresponsecriteriainsol