Cargando…

Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has demonstrated accuracy in the axillary staging of breast cancer patients. Despite variability in selection criteria and technique, an SLN is consistently identified in approximately 96% of cases and in most series predicts the status of remaining axillary L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freebody, John, Fernando, Shane, Rossleigh, Monica A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040742
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_32_18
_version_ 1783412875111432192
author Freebody, John
Fernando, Shane
Rossleigh, Monica A.
author_facet Freebody, John
Fernando, Shane
Rossleigh, Monica A.
author_sort Freebody, John
collection PubMed
description Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has demonstrated accuracy in the axillary staging of breast cancer patients. Despite variability in selection criteria and technique, an SLN is consistently identified in approximately 96% of cases and in most series predicts the status of remaining axillary LNs in >95% of cases. The false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was originally reported as 5%–10% (sensitivity 90%–95%), but improved rates are attainable by experienced surgeons. Radiolocalization with lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) increases SLN identification rates. LSG is a useful tool to establish the abnormal lymphatic drainage patterns and to detect the extra-axillary nodes, particularly internal mammary nodes. Despite controversy regarding the optimal injection method, studies have generally suggested high concordance between the various radiotracer application sites and axillary SLN identification. Discordant SLN identification would have implications for nodal staging as the true SLN might not be identified with individual injection techniques. In the current study, imaging from consecutive patients presenting for breast LSG over a-19 month period was retrospectively reviewed. Radiotracer application was performed with simultaneous injection of peritumoral, subcutaneous, and subareolar regions. This application method provided a mechanism to assess the LSG drainage patterns with a view to assessing injection site concordance and SLN identification rates. Data from 123 breast LSG patients were reviewed. Using our radiotracer technique, the axillary SLN identification rate was 98%. A single axillary node was detected in 110, two axillary nodes were detected in 10, and no axillary node was detected in three patients. Among those 10 patients in whom two axillary nodes were seen, at least two cases of discordant drainage occurred from different injection sites. This study demonstrates that different LSG injection sites can result in the identification of different axillary sentinel nodes although this appears to be a rare event. This finding may be of clinical importance if the true SLN is sought. In addition, the multisite injection technique appears to be an optimal method of axillary SLN identification, with high SLN detection rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6476254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64762542019-04-30 Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance Freebody, John Fernando, Shane Rossleigh, Monica A. World J Nucl Med Original Article Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has demonstrated accuracy in the axillary staging of breast cancer patients. Despite variability in selection criteria and technique, an SLN is consistently identified in approximately 96% of cases and in most series predicts the status of remaining axillary LNs in >95% of cases. The false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was originally reported as 5%–10% (sensitivity 90%–95%), but improved rates are attainable by experienced surgeons. Radiolocalization with lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) increases SLN identification rates. LSG is a useful tool to establish the abnormal lymphatic drainage patterns and to detect the extra-axillary nodes, particularly internal mammary nodes. Despite controversy regarding the optimal injection method, studies have generally suggested high concordance between the various radiotracer application sites and axillary SLN identification. Discordant SLN identification would have implications for nodal staging as the true SLN might not be identified with individual injection techniques. In the current study, imaging from consecutive patients presenting for breast LSG over a-19 month period was retrospectively reviewed. Radiotracer application was performed with simultaneous injection of peritumoral, subcutaneous, and subareolar regions. This application method provided a mechanism to assess the LSG drainage patterns with a view to assessing injection site concordance and SLN identification rates. Data from 123 breast LSG patients were reviewed. Using our radiotracer technique, the axillary SLN identification rate was 98%. A single axillary node was detected in 110, two axillary nodes were detected in 10, and no axillary node was detected in three patients. Among those 10 patients in whom two axillary nodes were seen, at least two cases of discordant drainage occurred from different injection sites. This study demonstrates that different LSG injection sites can result in the identification of different axillary sentinel nodes although this appears to be a rare event. This finding may be of clinical importance if the true SLN is sought. In addition, the multisite injection technique appears to be an optimal method of axillary SLN identification, with high SLN detection rates. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6476254/ /pubmed/31040742 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_32_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 World Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Freebody, John
Fernando, Shane
Rossleigh, Monica A.
Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
title Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
title_full Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
title_fullStr Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
title_full_unstemmed Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
title_short Triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
title_sort triple-site radiotracer application in breast lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node discordance
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31040742
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/wjnm.WJNM_32_18
work_keys_str_mv AT freebodyjohn triplesiteradiotracerapplicationinbreastlymphoscintigraphyandsentinelnodediscordance
AT fernandoshane triplesiteradiotracerapplicationinbreastlymphoscintigraphyandsentinelnodediscordance
AT rossleighmonicaa triplesiteradiotracerapplicationinbreastlymphoscintigraphyandsentinelnodediscordance