Cargando…
A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper
INTRODUCTION: Developments in information and communication technologies have enabled electronic health and seen a huge expansion over the last decade. This has increased the possibility of self-management of health issues. PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app on maternal self-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423618000294 |
_version_ | 1783412890141720576 |
---|---|
author | Deave, Toity Kendal, Sally Lingam, Raghu Day, Crispin Goodenough, Trudy Bailey, Elizabeth Ginja, Sam Nightingale, Sam Coad, Jane |
author_facet | Deave, Toity Kendal, Sally Lingam, Raghu Day, Crispin Goodenough, Trudy Bailey, Elizabeth Ginja, Sam Nightingale, Sam Coad, Jane |
author_sort | Deave, Toity |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Developments in information and communication technologies have enabled electronic health and seen a huge expansion over the last decade. This has increased the possibility of self-management of health issues. PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app on maternal self-efficacy and mental well-being three months post-birth in a sample of mothers recruited antenatally. In addition, to explore when, why and how mothers use the app and consider any benefits the app may offer them in relation to their parenting, health, relationships or communication with their child, friends, family members or health professionals. METHODS: We will use a mixed-methods approach, a cohort study, a qualitative element and analysis of in-app data. Participants will be first-time pregnant women, aged 16 years and over, between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation and recruited from five English study sites. EVALUATION PLAN: We will compare maternal self-efficacy and mental health at three months post-delivery in mothers who have downloaded the Baby Buddy app compared with those that have not downloaded the app, controlling for confounding factors. Women will be recruited antenatally between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation. Further follow-ups will take place at 35 weeks of gestation and three months post-birth. Data from the cohort study will be supplemented by in-app data that will include, for example, patterns of usage. Qualitative data will assess the impact of the app on the lives of pregnant women and health professionals using both focus groups and interviews. ETHICS: Approval from the West Midlands-South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (NRES) (16/WM/0029) and the University of the West of England, Bristol, Research Ethics Committee (HAS.16.08.001). DISSEMINATION: Findings of the study will be published in peer reviewed and professional journals, presented locally, nationally and at international conferences. Participants will receive a summary of the findings and the results will be published on Best Beginnings’ website. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6476387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64763872019-05-01 A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper Deave, Toity Kendal, Sally Lingam, Raghu Day, Crispin Goodenough, Trudy Bailey, Elizabeth Ginja, Sam Nightingale, Sam Coad, Jane Prim Health Care Res Dev Research INTRODUCTION: Developments in information and communication technologies have enabled electronic health and seen a huge expansion over the last decade. This has increased the possibility of self-management of health issues. PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of the Baby Buddy app on maternal self-efficacy and mental well-being three months post-birth in a sample of mothers recruited antenatally. In addition, to explore when, why and how mothers use the app and consider any benefits the app may offer them in relation to their parenting, health, relationships or communication with their child, friends, family members or health professionals. METHODS: We will use a mixed-methods approach, a cohort study, a qualitative element and analysis of in-app data. Participants will be first-time pregnant women, aged 16 years and over, between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation and recruited from five English study sites. EVALUATION PLAN: We will compare maternal self-efficacy and mental health at three months post-delivery in mothers who have downloaded the Baby Buddy app compared with those that have not downloaded the app, controlling for confounding factors. Women will be recruited antenatally between 12 and 16 weeks of gestation. Further follow-ups will take place at 35 weeks of gestation and three months post-birth. Data from the cohort study will be supplemented by in-app data that will include, for example, patterns of usage. Qualitative data will assess the impact of the app on the lives of pregnant women and health professionals using both focus groups and interviews. ETHICS: Approval from the West Midlands-South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee (NRES) (16/WM/0029) and the University of the West of England, Bristol, Research Ethics Committee (HAS.16.08.001). DISSEMINATION: Findings of the study will be published in peer reviewed and professional journals, presented locally, nationally and at international conferences. Participants will receive a summary of the findings and the results will be published on Best Beginnings’ website. Cambridge University Press 2018-07-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6476387/ /pubmed/30032734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423618000294 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits nrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Deave, Toity Kendal, Sally Lingam, Raghu Day, Crispin Goodenough, Trudy Bailey, Elizabeth Ginja, Sam Nightingale, Sam Coad, Jane A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper |
title | A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper |
title_full | A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper |
title_fullStr | A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper |
title_full_unstemmed | A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper |
title_short | A study to evaluate the effectiveness of Best Beginnings’ Baby Buddy phone app in England: a protocol paper |
title_sort | study to evaluate the effectiveness of best beginnings’ baby buddy phone app in england: a protocol paper |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30032734 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1463423618000294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deavetoity astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT kendalsally astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT lingamraghu astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT daycrispin astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT goodenoughtrudy astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT baileyelizabeth astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT ginjasam astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT nightingalesam astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT coadjane astudytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT deavetoity studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT kendalsally studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT lingamraghu studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT daycrispin studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT goodenoughtrudy studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT baileyelizabeth studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT ginjasam studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT nightingalesam studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper AT coadjane studytoevaluatetheeffectivenessofbestbeginningsbabybuddyphoneappinenglandaprotocolpaper |