Cargando…
How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view
BACKGROUND: In Japan, incidence of gastric cancer is expected to follow the current downward trend as the younger generation has lower incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. In this study we aimed to estimate how long gastric cancer screening is deemed necessary in the future from epidemiologic...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30242605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0877-z |
_version_ | 1783412938711760896 |
---|---|
author | Mizota, Yuri Yamamoto, Seiichiro |
author_facet | Mizota, Yuri Yamamoto, Seiichiro |
author_sort | Mizota, Yuri |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Japan, incidence of gastric cancer is expected to follow the current downward trend as the younger generation has lower incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. In this study we aimed to estimate how long gastric cancer screening is deemed necessary in the future from epidemiologic perspectives. METHODS: Following the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening 2014, recommendation of providing population-based gastric cancer screening is judged by balancing benefits and harms. Benefits and harms are estimated by number needed to screen (NNS) < 1000 and Number Needed to Recall (NNR) < 100. NNS is the number of people required to participate in a screening to prevent one death and NNR is the number of people required to undergo diagnostic examination to prevent one death. These index are estimated for 2020–2035 using future projections of gastric cancer mortality for the scenarios of relative risk (RR) of 0.5–0.9 for mortality reduction by the screening. RESULTS: The criteria of both NNS < 1000 and NNR < 100 are fulfilled for the following age groups: when RR is set as 0.6, men ≥ 55 and women ≥ 65; when RR is set as 0.7 and 0.8, men ≥ 65 and women ≥ 75; when RR is set as 0.9, men ≥ 75 only. CONCLUSIONS: In case of RR of 0.5 and 0.6, the gastric cancer screening are recommended for men ≥ 55 and women ≥ 65 until 2035, while it is not recommended for men and women in the 45–54 even in 2010 and 2015. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6476823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64768232019-05-14 How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view Mizota, Yuri Yamamoto, Seiichiro Gastric Cancer Original Article BACKGROUND: In Japan, incidence of gastric cancer is expected to follow the current downward trend as the younger generation has lower incidence of Helicobacter pylori infection. In this study we aimed to estimate how long gastric cancer screening is deemed necessary in the future from epidemiologic perspectives. METHODS: Following the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening 2014, recommendation of providing population-based gastric cancer screening is judged by balancing benefits and harms. Benefits and harms are estimated by number needed to screen (NNS) < 1000 and Number Needed to Recall (NNR) < 100. NNS is the number of people required to participate in a screening to prevent one death and NNR is the number of people required to undergo diagnostic examination to prevent one death. These index are estimated for 2020–2035 using future projections of gastric cancer mortality for the scenarios of relative risk (RR) of 0.5–0.9 for mortality reduction by the screening. RESULTS: The criteria of both NNS < 1000 and NNR < 100 are fulfilled for the following age groups: when RR is set as 0.6, men ≥ 55 and women ≥ 65; when RR is set as 0.7 and 0.8, men ≥ 65 and women ≥ 75; when RR is set as 0.9, men ≥ 75 only. CONCLUSIONS: In case of RR of 0.5 and 0.6, the gastric cancer screening are recommended for men ≥ 55 and women ≥ 65 until 2035, while it is not recommended for men and women in the 45–54 even in 2010 and 2015. Springer Singapore 2018-09-21 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6476823/ /pubmed/30242605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0877-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mizota, Yuri Yamamoto, Seiichiro How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view |
title | How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view |
title_full | How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view |
title_fullStr | How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view |
title_full_unstemmed | How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view |
title_short | How long should we continue gastric cancer screening? From an epidemiological point of view |
title_sort | how long should we continue gastric cancer screening? from an epidemiological point of view |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30242605 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0877-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mizotayuri howlongshouldwecontinuegastriccancerscreeningfromanepidemiologicalpointofview AT yamamotoseiichiro howlongshouldwecontinuegastriccancerscreeningfromanepidemiologicalpointofview |