Cargando…
Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification
The increased availability of labeled X-ray image archives (e.g. ChestX-ray14 dataset) has triggered a growing interest in deep learning techniques. To provide better insight into the different approaches, and their applications to chest X-ray classification, we investigate a powerful network archit...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42294-8 |
_version_ | 1783412953226149888 |
---|---|
author | Baltruschat, Ivo M. Nickisch, Hannes Grass, Michael Knopp, Tobias Saalbach, Axel |
author_facet | Baltruschat, Ivo M. Nickisch, Hannes Grass, Michael Knopp, Tobias Saalbach, Axel |
author_sort | Baltruschat, Ivo M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increased availability of labeled X-ray image archives (e.g. ChestX-ray14 dataset) has triggered a growing interest in deep learning techniques. To provide better insight into the different approaches, and their applications to chest X-ray classification, we investigate a powerful network architecture in detail: the ResNet-50. Building on prior work in this domain, we consider transfer learning with and without fine-tuning as well as the training of a dedicated X-ray network from scratch. To leverage the high spatial resolution of X-ray data, we also include an extended ResNet-50 architecture, and a network integrating non-image data (patient age, gender and acquisition type) in the classification process. In a concluding experiment, we also investigate multiple ResNet depths (i.e. ResNet-38 and ResNet-101). In a systematic evaluation, using 5-fold re-sampling and a multi-label loss function, we compare the performance of the different approaches for pathology classification by ROC statistics and analyze differences between the classifiers using rank correlation. Overall, we observe a considerable spread in the achieved performance and conclude that the X-ray-specific ResNet-38, integrating non-image data yields the best overall results. Furthermore, class activation maps are used to understand the classification process, and a detailed analysis of the impact of non-image features is provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6476887 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64768872019-05-02 Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification Baltruschat, Ivo M. Nickisch, Hannes Grass, Michael Knopp, Tobias Saalbach, Axel Sci Rep Article The increased availability of labeled X-ray image archives (e.g. ChestX-ray14 dataset) has triggered a growing interest in deep learning techniques. To provide better insight into the different approaches, and their applications to chest X-ray classification, we investigate a powerful network architecture in detail: the ResNet-50. Building on prior work in this domain, we consider transfer learning with and without fine-tuning as well as the training of a dedicated X-ray network from scratch. To leverage the high spatial resolution of X-ray data, we also include an extended ResNet-50 architecture, and a network integrating non-image data (patient age, gender and acquisition type) in the classification process. In a concluding experiment, we also investigate multiple ResNet depths (i.e. ResNet-38 and ResNet-101). In a systematic evaluation, using 5-fold re-sampling and a multi-label loss function, we compare the performance of the different approaches for pathology classification by ROC statistics and analyze differences between the classifiers using rank correlation. Overall, we observe a considerable spread in the achieved performance and conclude that the X-ray-specific ResNet-38, integrating non-image data yields the best overall results. Furthermore, class activation maps are used to understand the classification process, and a detailed analysis of the impact of non-image features is provided. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6476887/ /pubmed/31011155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42294-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Baltruschat, Ivo M. Nickisch, Hannes Grass, Michael Knopp, Tobias Saalbach, Axel Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification |
title | Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification |
title_full | Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification |
title_short | Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification |
title_sort | comparison of deep learning approaches for multi-label chest x-ray classification |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6476887/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31011155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42294-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baltruschativom comparisonofdeeplearningapproachesformultilabelchestxrayclassification AT nickischhannes comparisonofdeeplearningapproachesformultilabelchestxrayclassification AT grassmichael comparisonofdeeplearningapproachesformultilabelchestxrayclassification AT knopptobias comparisonofdeeplearningapproachesformultilabelchestxrayclassification AT saalbachaxel comparisonofdeeplearningapproachesformultilabelchestxrayclassification |