Cargando…
Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand
INTRODUCTION: Achieving effective integration of healthcare across primary, secondary and tertiary care is a key goal of the New Zealand (NZ) Health Strategy. NZ’s regional District Health Board (DHB) groupings are fundamental to delivering integration, bringing the country’s 20 DHBs together into f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030076 |
_version_ | 1783413018418216960 |
---|---|
author | Stokes, Tim Atmore, Carol Penno, Erin Richard, Lauralie Wyeth, Emma Richards, Rosalina Doolan-Noble, Fiona Gray, Andrew R Sullivan, Trudy Gauld, Robin |
author_facet | Stokes, Tim Atmore, Carol Penno, Erin Richard, Lauralie Wyeth, Emma Richards, Rosalina Doolan-Noble, Fiona Gray, Andrew R Sullivan, Trudy Gauld, Robin |
author_sort | Stokes, Tim |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Achieving effective integration of healthcare across primary, secondary and tertiary care is a key goal of the New Zealand (NZ) Health Strategy. NZ’s regional District Health Board (DHB) groupings are fundamental to delivering integration, bringing the country’s 20 DHBs together into four groups to collaboratively plan, fund and deliver health services within their defined geographical regions. This research aims to examine how, for whom and in what circumstances the regional DHB groupings work to improve health service integration, healthcare quality, health outcomes and health equity, particularly for Māori and Pacific peoples. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This research uses a mixed methods realist evaluation design. It comprises three linked studies: (1) formulating initial programme theory (IPT) through developing programme logic models to describe regional DHB working; (2) empirically testing IPT through both a qualitative process evaluation of regional DHB working using a case study design; and (3) a quantitative analysis of the impact that DHB regional groupings may have on service integration, health outcomes, health equity and costs. The findings of these three studies will allow refinement of the IPT and should lead to a programme theory which will explain how, for whom and in what circumstances regional DHB groupings improve service integration, health outcomes and health equity in NZ. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Otago Human Ethics Committee has approved this study. The embedding of a clinician researcher within a participating regional DHB grouping has facilitated research coproduction, the research has been jointly conceived and designed and will be jointly evaluated and disseminated by researchers and practitioners. Uptake of the research findings by other key groups including policymakers, Māori providers and communities and Pacific providers and communities will be supported through key strategic relationships and dissemination activities. Academic dissemination will occur through publication and conference presentations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6477391 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64773912019-05-14 Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand Stokes, Tim Atmore, Carol Penno, Erin Richard, Lauralie Wyeth, Emma Richards, Rosalina Doolan-Noble, Fiona Gray, Andrew R Sullivan, Trudy Gauld, Robin BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Achieving effective integration of healthcare across primary, secondary and tertiary care is a key goal of the New Zealand (NZ) Health Strategy. NZ’s regional District Health Board (DHB) groupings are fundamental to delivering integration, bringing the country’s 20 DHBs together into four groups to collaboratively plan, fund and deliver health services within their defined geographical regions. This research aims to examine how, for whom and in what circumstances the regional DHB groupings work to improve health service integration, healthcare quality, health outcomes and health equity, particularly for Māori and Pacific peoples. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This research uses a mixed methods realist evaluation design. It comprises three linked studies: (1) formulating initial programme theory (IPT) through developing programme logic models to describe regional DHB working; (2) empirically testing IPT through both a qualitative process evaluation of regional DHB working using a case study design; and (3) a quantitative analysis of the impact that DHB regional groupings may have on service integration, health outcomes, health equity and costs. The findings of these three studies will allow refinement of the IPT and should lead to a programme theory which will explain how, for whom and in what circumstances regional DHB groupings improve service integration, health outcomes and health equity in NZ. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Otago Human Ethics Committee has approved this study. The embedding of a clinician researcher within a participating regional DHB grouping has facilitated research coproduction, the research has been jointly conceived and designed and will be jointly evaluated and disseminated by researchers and practitioners. Uptake of the research findings by other key groups including policymakers, Māori providers and communities and Pacific providers and communities will be supported through key strategic relationships and dissemination activities. Academic dissemination will occur through publication and conference presentations. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6477391/ /pubmed/30928966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030076 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Stokes, Tim Atmore, Carol Penno, Erin Richard, Lauralie Wyeth, Emma Richards, Rosalina Doolan-Noble, Fiona Gray, Andrew R Sullivan, Trudy Gauld, Robin Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand |
title | Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand |
title_full | Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand |
title_short | Protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional District Health Board groupings in New Zealand |
title_sort | protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation of regional district health board groupings in new zealand |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477391/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stokestim protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT atmorecarol protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT pennoerin protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT richardlauralie protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT wyethemma protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT richardsrosalina protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT doolannoblefiona protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT grayandrewr protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT sullivantrudy protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand AT gauldrobin protocolforamixedmethodsrealistevaluationofregionaldistricthealthboardgroupingsinnewzealand |