Cargando…
Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
BACKGROUND: The best strategy for the treatment of the non-infarct artery in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not yet defined. METHODS: We searched the literature for randomized contr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31010423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1073-8 |
_version_ | 1783413064822947840 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Haiyan Zhang, Xiwen Li, Jiangjin Liu, Hailang Hu, Xiao Yang, Jing |
author_facet | Xu, Haiyan Zhang, Xiwen Li, Jiangjin Liu, Hailang Hu, Xiao Yang, Jing |
author_sort | Xu, Haiyan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The best strategy for the treatment of the non-infarct artery in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not yet defined. METHODS: We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared complete revascularization (CR) with infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) only revascularization in hemodynamically stable patients with STEMI. Random effect risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 2989 patients were included. No significant difference in all-cause mortality emerged between CR and IRA-only groups (relative risk [RR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 1.04; p = 0.08). Compared with IRA-only, CR was associated with significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.68; p < 0.001), cardiac death (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.79; p = 0.004) and repeat revascularization (RR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.47; p < 0.001). In subgroups analysis, immediate complete revascularization (ICR) reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.97; p = 0.04), whereas staged complete revascularization (SCR) did not show any significant benefit in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.86; p = 0.82). Stroke, contrast-induced nephropathy and major bleeding were not different between CR and IRA-only. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI, complete revascularization did not decrease the risk of all-cause mortality in current evidence from randomized trials. When feasible, immediate complete revascularization might be considered in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1073-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6477715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64777152019-05-01 Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials Xu, Haiyan Zhang, Xiwen Li, Jiangjin Liu, Hailang Hu, Xiao Yang, Jing BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The best strategy for the treatment of the non-infarct artery in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not yet defined. METHODS: We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared complete revascularization (CR) with infarct-related coronary artery (IRA) only revascularization in hemodynamically stable patients with STEMI. Random effect risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with 2989 patients were included. No significant difference in all-cause mortality emerged between CR and IRA-only groups (relative risk [RR] = 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 1.04; p = 0.08). Compared with IRA-only, CR was associated with significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.68; p < 0.001), cardiac death (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.79; p = 0.004) and repeat revascularization (RR = 0.38; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.47; p < 0.001). In subgroups analysis, immediate complete revascularization (ICR) reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.97; p = 0.04), whereas staged complete revascularization (SCR) did not show any significant benefit in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.46 to 1.86; p = 0.82). Stroke, contrast-induced nephropathy and major bleeding were not different between CR and IRA-only. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI, complete revascularization did not decrease the risk of all-cause mortality in current evidence from randomized trials. When feasible, immediate complete revascularization might be considered in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12872-019-1073-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6477715/ /pubmed/31010423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1073-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Xu, Haiyan Zhang, Xiwen Li, Jiangjin Liu, Hailang Hu, Xiao Yang, Jing Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title | Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_full | Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_fullStr | Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_short | Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
title_sort | complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31010423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1073-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuhaiyan completeversusculpritonlyrevascularizationinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionandmultivesseldiseaseametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT zhangxiwen completeversusculpritonlyrevascularizationinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionandmultivesseldiseaseametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT lijiangjin completeversusculpritonlyrevascularizationinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionandmultivesseldiseaseametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT liuhailang completeversusculpritonlyrevascularizationinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionandmultivesseldiseaseametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT huxiao completeversusculpritonlyrevascularizationinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionandmultivesseldiseaseametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials AT yangjing completeversusculpritonlyrevascularizationinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarctionandmultivesseldiseaseametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials |