Cargando…

Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND: Uveitis is a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases whose primary treatment involves immunosuppression. Although corticosteroids (CSs) remain the mainstay therapy, sirolimus is among the recently studied immunomodulatory drugs for treating noninfectious uveitis (NIU). OBJECTIVE: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cabahug, Vicente Lorenzo O, Uy, Harvey S, Yu-Keh, Ellen, Sapno, Kristine Joy D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114144
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S198401
_version_ 1783413164644237312
author Cabahug, Vicente Lorenzo O
Uy, Harvey S
Yu-Keh, Ellen
Sapno, Kristine Joy D
author_facet Cabahug, Vicente Lorenzo O
Uy, Harvey S
Yu-Keh, Ellen
Sapno, Kristine Joy D
author_sort Cabahug, Vicente Lorenzo O
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uveitis is a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases whose primary treatment involves immunosuppression. Although corticosteroids (CSs) remain the mainstay therapy, sirolimus is among the recently studied immunomodulatory drugs for treating noninfectious uveitis (NIU). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess and summarize the updated evidence on the outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for NIU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two reviewers conducted a systematic search on November 5, 2018, of electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library) and clinical trial registers having no restrictions on language or publication date. The primary outcome was uveitis activity as measured by vitreous haze (VH), while the secondary outcomes included central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CS-sparing effect, IOP elevation, and other adverse events. A meta-analysis was conducted on selected studies with appropriate clinical and methodological homogeneity. RESULTS: Seven studies were included and reviewed. Four randomized clinical trials were eligible for meta-analysis: SAVE 2013, One-year outcomes of the SAVE study, SAVE 2 2016, SAKURA 2016. The pooled proportions of inflammation control (VH improvement) were 38% (95% CI 16.19%–62.66%) during a 6-month follow-up and 49.97% (95% CI 16.19%–83.03%) during a 6- to 12-month follow-up with the latter showing a significantly higher response rate (p=0.0472). BCVA improvement was 62.2% (95% CI 33.17%–87.11%) during a 6-month follow-up and 56.86% (95% CI 20.91%–89.05%) during a 6- to 12-month follow-up with no significant difference between the two (p=0.3705). Increased IOP remained at 7.11% (95% CI 3.46%–12.68%) for both a 6-month follow-up and up to a 12-month follow-up duration. The CS-sparing effect of sirolimus was also well demonstrated. A reduction in CMT was observed, and only minor drug-related adverse events were reported in all the studies reviewed. CONCLUSION: This review provided evidence that sirolimus is a promising treatment option for controlling inflammatory activity, improving visual acuity, and sparing CS use with minor adverse events for NIU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6478489
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64784892019-05-21 Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review Cabahug, Vicente Lorenzo O Uy, Harvey S Yu-Keh, Ellen Sapno, Kristine Joy D Clin Ophthalmol Review BACKGROUND: Uveitis is a group of intraocular inflammatory diseases whose primary treatment involves immunosuppression. Although corticosteroids (CSs) remain the mainstay therapy, sirolimus is among the recently studied immunomodulatory drugs for treating noninfectious uveitis (NIU). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to assess and summarize the updated evidence on the outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for NIU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two reviewers conducted a systematic search on November 5, 2018, of electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library) and clinical trial registers having no restrictions on language or publication date. The primary outcome was uveitis activity as measured by vitreous haze (VH), while the secondary outcomes included central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), CS-sparing effect, IOP elevation, and other adverse events. A meta-analysis was conducted on selected studies with appropriate clinical and methodological homogeneity. RESULTS: Seven studies were included and reviewed. Four randomized clinical trials were eligible for meta-analysis: SAVE 2013, One-year outcomes of the SAVE study, SAVE 2 2016, SAKURA 2016. The pooled proportions of inflammation control (VH improvement) were 38% (95% CI 16.19%–62.66%) during a 6-month follow-up and 49.97% (95% CI 16.19%–83.03%) during a 6- to 12-month follow-up with the latter showing a significantly higher response rate (p=0.0472). BCVA improvement was 62.2% (95% CI 33.17%–87.11%) during a 6-month follow-up and 56.86% (95% CI 20.91%–89.05%) during a 6- to 12-month follow-up with no significant difference between the two (p=0.3705). Increased IOP remained at 7.11% (95% CI 3.46%–12.68%) for both a 6-month follow-up and up to a 12-month follow-up duration. The CS-sparing effect of sirolimus was also well demonstrated. A reduction in CMT was observed, and only minor drug-related adverse events were reported in all the studies reviewed. CONCLUSION: This review provided evidence that sirolimus is a promising treatment option for controlling inflammatory activity, improving visual acuity, and sparing CS use with minor adverse events for NIU. Dove Medical Press 2019-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6478489/ /pubmed/31114144 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S198401 Text en © 2019 Cabahug et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Cabahug, Vicente Lorenzo O
Uy, Harvey S
Yu-Keh, Ellen
Sapno, Kristine Joy D
Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_fullStr Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_short Outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
title_sort outcomes of treatment with sirolimus for non-infectious uveitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31114144
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S198401
work_keys_str_mv AT cabahugvicentelorenzoo outcomesoftreatmentwithsirolimusfornoninfectiousuveitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT uyharveys outcomesoftreatmentwithsirolimusfornoninfectiousuveitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT yukehellen outcomesoftreatmentwithsirolimusfornoninfectiousuveitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview
AT sapnokristinejoyd outcomesoftreatmentwithsirolimusfornoninfectiousuveitisametaanalysisandsystematicreview