Cargando…

Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration

Absolute values of cortical porosity and trabecular density are used to estimate fracture risk, but these values are the net result of their growth‐related assembly and age‐related deterioration. Because bone loss affects both cortical and trabecular bone, we hypothesized that a surrogate measure of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zebaze, Roger, Atkinson, Elizabeth J, Peng, Yu, Bui, Minh, Ghasem‐Zadeh, Ali, Khosla, Sundeep, Seeman, Ego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10078
_version_ 1783413168552280064
author Zebaze, Roger
Atkinson, Elizabeth J
Peng, Yu
Bui, Minh
Ghasem‐Zadeh, Ali
Khosla, Sundeep
Seeman, Ego
author_facet Zebaze, Roger
Atkinson, Elizabeth J
Peng, Yu
Bui, Minh
Ghasem‐Zadeh, Ali
Khosla, Sundeep
Seeman, Ego
author_sort Zebaze, Roger
collection PubMed
description Absolute values of cortical porosity and trabecular density are used to estimate fracture risk, but these values are the net result of their growth‐related assembly and age‐related deterioration. Because bone loss affects both cortical and trabecular bone, we hypothesized that a surrogate measure of bone fragility should capture the age‐related deterioration of both traits, and should do so independently of their peak values. Accordingly, we developed a structural fragility score (SFS), which quantifies the increment in distal radial cortical porosity and decrement in trabecular density relative to their premenopausal mean values in 99 postmenopausal women with forearm fractures and 105 controls using HR‐pQCT. We expressed the results as odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI). Cortical porosity was associated with fractures in the presence of deteriorated trabecular density (OR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.05; p = 0.004), but not if trabecular deterioration was absent (OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.86; p = 0.91). Likewise, trabecular density was associated with fractures in the presence of high cortical porosity (OR 3.35; 95% CI, 1.85 to 6.07; p < 0.0001), but not in its absence (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 0.78 to 3.28; p = 0.20). The SFS, which captures coexisting cortical and trabecular deterioration, was associated with fractures (OR 4.52; 95% CI, 2.17 to 9.45; p < 0.0001). BMD was associated with fracture before accounting for the SFS (OR 5.79; 95% CI, 1.24 to 27.1; p = 0.026), not after (OR 4.38; 95% CI, 0.48 to 39.9; p = 0.19). The SFS was associated with fracture before (OR 4.67; 95% CI, 2.21 to 9.88) and after (OR 3.94; 95% CI, 1.80 to 8.6) accounting for BMD (both ps < 0.0001). The disease of bone fragility is captured by cortical and trabecular deterioration: A measurement of coexisting cortical and trabecular deterioration is likely to identify women at risk for fracture more robustly than absolute values of cortical porosity, trabecular density, or BMD. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6478579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64785792019-05-01 Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration Zebaze, Roger Atkinson, Elizabeth J Peng, Yu Bui, Minh Ghasem‐Zadeh, Ali Khosla, Sundeep Seeman, Ego JBMR Plus Original Articles Absolute values of cortical porosity and trabecular density are used to estimate fracture risk, but these values are the net result of their growth‐related assembly and age‐related deterioration. Because bone loss affects both cortical and trabecular bone, we hypothesized that a surrogate measure of bone fragility should capture the age‐related deterioration of both traits, and should do so independently of their peak values. Accordingly, we developed a structural fragility score (SFS), which quantifies the increment in distal radial cortical porosity and decrement in trabecular density relative to their premenopausal mean values in 99 postmenopausal women with forearm fractures and 105 controls using HR‐pQCT. We expressed the results as odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI). Cortical porosity was associated with fractures in the presence of deteriorated trabecular density (OR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.05; p = 0.004), but not if trabecular deterioration was absent (OR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.86; p = 0.91). Likewise, trabecular density was associated with fractures in the presence of high cortical porosity (OR 3.35; 95% CI, 1.85 to 6.07; p < 0.0001), but not in its absence (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 0.78 to 3.28; p = 0.20). The SFS, which captures coexisting cortical and trabecular deterioration, was associated with fractures (OR 4.52; 95% CI, 2.17 to 9.45; p < 0.0001). BMD was associated with fracture before accounting for the SFS (OR 5.79; 95% CI, 1.24 to 27.1; p = 0.026), not after (OR 4.38; 95% CI, 0.48 to 39.9; p = 0.19). The SFS was associated with fracture before (OR 4.67; 95% CI, 2.21 to 9.88) and after (OR 3.94; 95% CI, 1.80 to 8.6) accounting for BMD (both ps < 0.0001). The disease of bone fragility is captured by cortical and trabecular deterioration: A measurement of coexisting cortical and trabecular deterioration is likely to identify women at risk for fracture more robustly than absolute values of cortical porosity, trabecular density, or BMD. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6478579/ /pubmed/31044180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10078 Text en © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Zebaze, Roger
Atkinson, Elizabeth J
Peng, Yu
Bui, Minh
Ghasem‐Zadeh, Ali
Khosla, Sundeep
Seeman, Ego
Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration
title Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration
title_full Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration
title_fullStr Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration
title_full_unstemmed Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration
title_short Increased Cortical Porosity and Reduced Trabecular Density Are Not Necessarily Synonymous With Bone Loss and Microstructural Deterioration
title_sort increased cortical porosity and reduced trabecular density are not necessarily synonymous with bone loss and microstructural deterioration
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6478579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31044180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10078
work_keys_str_mv AT zebazeroger increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration
AT atkinsonelizabethj increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration
AT pengyu increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration
AT buiminh increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration
AT ghasemzadehali increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration
AT khoslasundeep increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration
AT seemanego increasedcorticalporosityandreducedtrabeculardensityarenotnecessarilysynonymouswithbonelossandmicrostructuraldeterioration