Cargando…

Association of Newly Developed Right Bundle Branch Block with Graft Rejection Following Heart Transplantation

PURPOSE: We aimed to examine associations between right bundle branch block (RBBB) following heart transplantation (HT) and graft rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 51 patients who underwent endomyocardial biopsies, electrocardiogram, right-side cardiac catheterization, and echocardio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jin-Ho, Oh, Jaewon, Kim, Min Ji, Kim, In-Cheol, Uhm, Jae-Sun, Pak, Hui-Nam, Kang, Seok-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31016903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.5.423
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: We aimed to examine associations between right bundle branch block (RBBB) following heart transplantation (HT) and graft rejection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated 51 patients who underwent endomyocardial biopsies, electrocardiogram, right-side cardiac catheterization, and echocardiography at 1 month and 1 year after HT. We classified patients into four groups according to the development of RBBB, based on electrocardiogram at 1 month and 1 year: 1) sustained RBBB, 2) disappeared RBBB, 3) newly developed RBBB, and 4) sustained non-RBBB. The RBBB was defined as an RSR' pattern in V1 with a QRS duration ≥100 ms on electrocardiogram. RESULTS: The newly developed RBBB group (n=13, 25.5%) had a higher rate of new onset graft rejection (from grade 0 to grade ≥1R, 30.8% vs. 10.0% vs. 21.4%, p=0.042) at 1 year, compared with sustained RBBB (n=10, 19.6%) and sustained non-RBBB group (n=28, 54.9%). In contrast, the incidence of resolved graft rejection (from grade ≥1R to grade 0) was higher in the sustained RBBB group than the newly developed RBBB and sustained non-RBBB groups (70.0% vs. 7.7% vs. 25.0%, p=0.042). Left atrial volume index was significantly higher in the newly developed RBBB group than the sustained RBBB and sustained non-RBBB groups (60.6±25.9 mL/m(2) vs. 36.0±11.0 mL/m(2) vs. 38.4±18.1 mL/m(2), p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Close monitoring for new development of RBBB at 1 year after HT, which was associated with a higher incidence of new onset graft rejection, may be helpful to identify high risk patients for graft rejection.