Cargando…

Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis

There is limited evidence to describe Australian mothers’ understanding of the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines (AIFG). A qualitative inductive methodological approach was used in this study to explore experiences with the introduction of solid food. Seven focus groups with 42 mothers of childre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Begley, Andrea, Ringrose, Kyla, Giglia, Roslyn, Scott, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30934967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071141
_version_ 1783413384972075008
author Begley, Andrea
Ringrose, Kyla
Giglia, Roslyn
Scott, Jane
author_facet Begley, Andrea
Ringrose, Kyla
Giglia, Roslyn
Scott, Jane
author_sort Begley, Andrea
collection PubMed
description There is limited evidence to describe Australian mothers’ understanding of the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines (AIFG). A qualitative inductive methodological approach was used in this study to explore experiences with the introduction of solid food. Seven focus groups with 42 mothers of children aged 4–18 months were conducted in disadvantaged areas in Perth, Australia. The mean age of infants was 9.6 months and mean age of introduction of solid food was 4.3 months (range 1.2 to 7.5 months). Almost half of the mothers in this study were aware of the AIFG however, only half again could correctly identify the recommended age for introducing solid food. Four themes and nine subthemes emerged from the analysis. Themes were (1) Every child is different (judging signs of readiness); (2) Everyone gives you advice (juggling conflicting advice); (3) Go with your gut—(being a “good” mother); and (4) It’s not a sin to start them too early or too late (—guidelines are advice and not requirements). The findings indicated that in spite of continued promotion of the AIFG over the past ten years achieving the around six months guideline is challenging. Professionals must address barriers and support enablers to achieving infant feeding recommendations in the design education materials and programs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6479610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64796102019-04-29 Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis Begley, Andrea Ringrose, Kyla Giglia, Roslyn Scott, Jane Int J Environ Res Public Health Article There is limited evidence to describe Australian mothers’ understanding of the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines (AIFG). A qualitative inductive methodological approach was used in this study to explore experiences with the introduction of solid food. Seven focus groups with 42 mothers of children aged 4–18 months were conducted in disadvantaged areas in Perth, Australia. The mean age of infants was 9.6 months and mean age of introduction of solid food was 4.3 months (range 1.2 to 7.5 months). Almost half of the mothers in this study were aware of the AIFG however, only half again could correctly identify the recommended age for introducing solid food. Four themes and nine subthemes emerged from the analysis. Themes were (1) Every child is different (judging signs of readiness); (2) Everyone gives you advice (juggling conflicting advice); (3) Go with your gut—(being a “good” mother); and (4) It’s not a sin to start them too early or too late (—guidelines are advice and not requirements). The findings indicated that in spite of continued promotion of the AIFG over the past ten years achieving the around six months guideline is challenging. Professionals must address barriers and support enablers to achieving infant feeding recommendations in the design education materials and programs. MDPI 2019-03-29 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6479610/ /pubmed/30934967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071141 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Begley, Andrea
Ringrose, Kyla
Giglia, Roslyn
Scott, Jane
Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
title Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
title_full Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
title_fullStr Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
title_short Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
title_sort mothers’ understanding of infant feeding guidelines and their associated practices: a qualitative analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30934967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071141
work_keys_str_mv AT begleyandrea mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis
AT ringrosekyla mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis
AT gigliaroslyn mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis
AT scottjane mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis