Cargando…
Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis
There is limited evidence to describe Australian mothers’ understanding of the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines (AIFG). A qualitative inductive methodological approach was used in this study to explore experiences with the introduction of solid food. Seven focus groups with 42 mothers of childre...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30934967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071141 |
_version_ | 1783413384972075008 |
---|---|
author | Begley, Andrea Ringrose, Kyla Giglia, Roslyn Scott, Jane |
author_facet | Begley, Andrea Ringrose, Kyla Giglia, Roslyn Scott, Jane |
author_sort | Begley, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is limited evidence to describe Australian mothers’ understanding of the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines (AIFG). A qualitative inductive methodological approach was used in this study to explore experiences with the introduction of solid food. Seven focus groups with 42 mothers of children aged 4–18 months were conducted in disadvantaged areas in Perth, Australia. The mean age of infants was 9.6 months and mean age of introduction of solid food was 4.3 months (range 1.2 to 7.5 months). Almost half of the mothers in this study were aware of the AIFG however, only half again could correctly identify the recommended age for introducing solid food. Four themes and nine subthemes emerged from the analysis. Themes were (1) Every child is different (judging signs of readiness); (2) Everyone gives you advice (juggling conflicting advice); (3) Go with your gut—(being a “good” mother); and (4) It’s not a sin to start them too early or too late (—guidelines are advice and not requirements). The findings indicated that in spite of continued promotion of the AIFG over the past ten years achieving the around six months guideline is challenging. Professionals must address barriers and support enablers to achieving infant feeding recommendations in the design education materials and programs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6479610 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64796102019-04-29 Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis Begley, Andrea Ringrose, Kyla Giglia, Roslyn Scott, Jane Int J Environ Res Public Health Article There is limited evidence to describe Australian mothers’ understanding of the Australian Infant Feeding Guidelines (AIFG). A qualitative inductive methodological approach was used in this study to explore experiences with the introduction of solid food. Seven focus groups with 42 mothers of children aged 4–18 months were conducted in disadvantaged areas in Perth, Australia. The mean age of infants was 9.6 months and mean age of introduction of solid food was 4.3 months (range 1.2 to 7.5 months). Almost half of the mothers in this study were aware of the AIFG however, only half again could correctly identify the recommended age for introducing solid food. Four themes and nine subthemes emerged from the analysis. Themes were (1) Every child is different (judging signs of readiness); (2) Everyone gives you advice (juggling conflicting advice); (3) Go with your gut—(being a “good” mother); and (4) It’s not a sin to start them too early or too late (—guidelines are advice and not requirements). The findings indicated that in spite of continued promotion of the AIFG over the past ten years achieving the around six months guideline is challenging. Professionals must address barriers and support enablers to achieving infant feeding recommendations in the design education materials and programs. MDPI 2019-03-29 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6479610/ /pubmed/30934967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071141 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Begley, Andrea Ringrose, Kyla Giglia, Roslyn Scott, Jane Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis |
title | Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis |
title_full | Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis |
title_fullStr | Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis |
title_short | Mothers’ Understanding of Infant Feeding Guidelines and Their Associated Practices: A Qualitative Analysis |
title_sort | mothers’ understanding of infant feeding guidelines and their associated practices: a qualitative analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479610/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30934967 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT begleyandrea mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis AT ringrosekyla mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis AT gigliaroslyn mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis AT scottjane mothersunderstandingofinfantfeedingguidelinesandtheirassociatedpracticesaqualitativeanalysis |