Cargando…

Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization

The experimental stress-strain curves from the standardized tests of Tensile, Plane Stress, Compression, Volumetric Compression, and Shear, are normally used to obtain the invariant λi and constants of material C(i) that will define the behavior elastomers. Obtaining these experimental curves requir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Íñiguez-Macedo, Saúl, Lostado-Lorza, Rubén, Escribano-García, Rubén, Martínez-Calvo, María Ángeles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30934792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071019
_version_ 1783413451368955904
author Íñiguez-Macedo, Saúl
Lostado-Lorza, Rubén
Escribano-García, Rubén
Martínez-Calvo, María Ángeles
author_facet Íñiguez-Macedo, Saúl
Lostado-Lorza, Rubén
Escribano-García, Rubén
Martínez-Calvo, María Ángeles
author_sort Íñiguez-Macedo, Saúl
collection PubMed
description The experimental stress-strain curves from the standardized tests of Tensile, Plane Stress, Compression, Volumetric Compression, and Shear, are normally used to obtain the invariant λi and constants of material C(i) that will define the behavior elastomers. Obtaining these experimental curves requires the use of expensive and complex experimental equipment. For years, a direct method called model updating, which is based on the combination of parameterized finite element (FE) models and experimental force-displacement curves, which are simpler and more economical than stress-strain curves, has been used to obtain the C(i) constants. Model updating has the disadvantage of requiring a high computational cost when it is used without the support of any known optimization method or when the number of standardized tests and required C(i) constants is high. This paper proposes a methodology that combines the model updating method, the mentioned standardized tests and the multi-response surface method (MRS) with desirability functions to automatically determine the most appropriate C(i) constants for modeling the behavior of a group of elastomers. For each standardized test, quadratic regression models were generated for modeling the error functions (ER), which represent the distance between the force-displacement curves that were obtained experimentally and those that were obtained by means of the parameterized FE models. The process of adjusting each C(i) constant was carried out with desirability functions, considering the same value of importance for all of the standardized tests. As a practical example, the proposed methodology was validated with the following elastomers: nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) and polyurethane (PUR). Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden, Arruda–Boyce and Gent were considered as the hyper-elastic models for modeling the mechanical behavior of the mentioned elastomers. The validation results, after the C(i) parameters were adjusted, showed that the Mooney–Rivlin model was the hyper-elastic model that has the least error of all materials studied (MAEnorm = 0.054 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.127 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.116 for EVA and MAEnorm = 0.061 for NBR). The small error obtained in the adjustment of the C(i) constants, as well as the computational cost of new materials, suggests that the methodology that this paper proposes could be a simpler and more economical alternative to use to obtain the optimal C(i) constants of any type of elastomer than other more sophisticated methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6479898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64798982019-04-29 Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization Íñiguez-Macedo, Saúl Lostado-Lorza, Rubén Escribano-García, Rubén Martínez-Calvo, María Ángeles Materials (Basel) Article The experimental stress-strain curves from the standardized tests of Tensile, Plane Stress, Compression, Volumetric Compression, and Shear, are normally used to obtain the invariant λi and constants of material C(i) that will define the behavior elastomers. Obtaining these experimental curves requires the use of expensive and complex experimental equipment. For years, a direct method called model updating, which is based on the combination of parameterized finite element (FE) models and experimental force-displacement curves, which are simpler and more economical than stress-strain curves, has been used to obtain the C(i) constants. Model updating has the disadvantage of requiring a high computational cost when it is used without the support of any known optimization method or when the number of standardized tests and required C(i) constants is high. This paper proposes a methodology that combines the model updating method, the mentioned standardized tests and the multi-response surface method (MRS) with desirability functions to automatically determine the most appropriate C(i) constants for modeling the behavior of a group of elastomers. For each standardized test, quadratic regression models were generated for modeling the error functions (ER), which represent the distance between the force-displacement curves that were obtained experimentally and those that were obtained by means of the parameterized FE models. The process of adjusting each C(i) constant was carried out with desirability functions, considering the same value of importance for all of the standardized tests. As a practical example, the proposed methodology was validated with the following elastomers: nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) and polyurethane (PUR). Mooney–Rivlin, Ogden, Arruda–Boyce and Gent were considered as the hyper-elastic models for modeling the mechanical behavior of the mentioned elastomers. The validation results, after the C(i) parameters were adjusted, showed that the Mooney–Rivlin model was the hyper-elastic model that has the least error of all materials studied (MAEnorm = 0.054 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.127 for NBR, MAEnorm = 0.116 for EVA and MAEnorm = 0.061 for NBR). The small error obtained in the adjustment of the C(i) constants, as well as the computational cost of new materials, suggests that the methodology that this paper proposes could be a simpler and more economical alternative to use to obtain the optimal C(i) constants of any type of elastomer than other more sophisticated methods. MDPI 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6479898/ /pubmed/30934792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071019 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Íñiguez-Macedo, Saúl
Lostado-Lorza, Rubén
Escribano-García, Rubén
Martínez-Calvo, María Ángeles
Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization
title Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization
title_full Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization
title_fullStr Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization
title_full_unstemmed Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization
title_short Finite Element Model Updating Combined with Multi-Response Optimization for Hyper-Elastic Materials Characterization
title_sort finite element model updating combined with multi-response optimization for hyper-elastic materials characterization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6479898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30934792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071019
work_keys_str_mv AT iniguezmacedosaul finiteelementmodelupdatingcombinedwithmultiresponseoptimizationforhyperelasticmaterialscharacterization
AT lostadolorzaruben finiteelementmodelupdatingcombinedwithmultiresponseoptimizationforhyperelasticmaterialscharacterization
AT escribanogarciaruben finiteelementmodelupdatingcombinedwithmultiresponseoptimizationforhyperelasticmaterialscharacterization
AT martinezcalvomariaangeles finiteelementmodelupdatingcombinedwithmultiresponseoptimizationforhyperelasticmaterialscharacterization