Cargando…

Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model

Infections of bone are severe complications, and an optimization of grafting material with antimicrobial drugs might be useful for prevention and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the influence of gentamicin-loaded bone graft on the healing of bone defects in a sheep model. Metaphyseal and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beuttel, Elisabeth, Bormann, Nicole, Pobloth, Anne-Marie, Duda, Georg N., Wildemann, Britt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071116
_version_ 1783413492006518784
author Beuttel, Elisabeth
Bormann, Nicole
Pobloth, Anne-Marie
Duda, Georg N.
Wildemann, Britt
author_facet Beuttel, Elisabeth
Bormann, Nicole
Pobloth, Anne-Marie
Duda, Georg N.
Wildemann, Britt
author_sort Beuttel, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description Infections of bone are severe complications, and an optimization of grafting material with antimicrobial drugs might be useful for prevention and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the influence of gentamicin-loaded bone graft on the healing of bone defects in a sheep model. Metaphyseal and diaphyseal drill hole defects (diameter: 6 mm, depth: 15 mm) were filled with graft or gentamicin-loaded graft (50 mg/g graft) or were left untreated. Analysis of regeneration after three and nine weeks, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and histology revealed a significant increase in bone formation in the drill hole defects, which began at the edges of the holes and grew over time into the defect center. The amount of graft decreased over time due to active resorption by osteoclasts, while osteoblasts formed new bone. No difference between the groups was seen after three weeks. After nine weeks, significantly less mineralized tissue was formed in the gentamicin-loaded graft group. Signs of inflammatory reactions were seen in all three groups. Even though the applied gentamicin concentration was based on the concentration of gentamicin mixed with cement, the healing process was impaired. When using local gentamicin, a dose-dependent, compromising effect on bone healing should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6480073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64800732019-04-29 Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model Beuttel, Elisabeth Bormann, Nicole Pobloth, Anne-Marie Duda, Georg N. Wildemann, Britt Materials (Basel) Article Infections of bone are severe complications, and an optimization of grafting material with antimicrobial drugs might be useful for prevention and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the influence of gentamicin-loaded bone graft on the healing of bone defects in a sheep model. Metaphyseal and diaphyseal drill hole defects (diameter: 6 mm, depth: 15 mm) were filled with graft or gentamicin-loaded graft (50 mg/g graft) or were left untreated. Analysis of regeneration after three and nine weeks, micro-computed tomography (μCT), and histology revealed a significant increase in bone formation in the drill hole defects, which began at the edges of the holes and grew over time into the defect center. The amount of graft decreased over time due to active resorption by osteoclasts, while osteoblasts formed new bone. No difference between the groups was seen after three weeks. After nine weeks, significantly less mineralized tissue was formed in the gentamicin-loaded graft group. Signs of inflammatory reactions were seen in all three groups. Even though the applied gentamicin concentration was based on the concentration of gentamicin mixed with cement, the healing process was impaired. When using local gentamicin, a dose-dependent, compromising effect on bone healing should be considered. MDPI 2019-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6480073/ /pubmed/30987272 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071116 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beuttel, Elisabeth
Bormann, Nicole
Pobloth, Anne-Marie
Duda, Georg N.
Wildemann, Britt
Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model
title Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model
title_full Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model
title_fullStr Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model
title_short Impact of Gentamicin-Loaded Bone Graft on Defect Healing in a Sheep Model
title_sort impact of gentamicin-loaded bone graft on defect healing in a sheep model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987272
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071116
work_keys_str_mv AT beuttelelisabeth impactofgentamicinloadedbonegraftondefecthealinginasheepmodel
AT bormannnicole impactofgentamicinloadedbonegraftondefecthealinginasheepmodel
AT poblothannemarie impactofgentamicinloadedbonegraftondefecthealinginasheepmodel
AT dudageorgn impactofgentamicinloadedbonegraftondefecthealinginasheepmodel
AT wildemannbritt impactofgentamicinloadedbonegraftondefecthealinginasheepmodel