Cargando…

Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing

This in vitro study investigated the impact of various dentifrices on the shade, translucency, gloss, and surface characteristics of polishing- or glazing-finished monolithic zirconia surfaces after simulated toothbrushing. Eighty square-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were divided into two maj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jae-Hyun, Kim, Sung-Hun, Han, Jung-Suk, Yeo, In-Sung Luke, Yoon, Hyung-In
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071158
_version_ 1783413557604384768
author Lee, Jae-Hyun
Kim, Sung-Hun
Han, Jung-Suk
Yeo, In-Sung Luke
Yoon, Hyung-In
author_facet Lee, Jae-Hyun
Kim, Sung-Hun
Han, Jung-Suk
Yeo, In-Sung Luke
Yoon, Hyung-In
author_sort Lee, Jae-Hyun
collection PubMed
description This in vitro study investigated the impact of various dentifrices on the shade, translucency, gloss, and surface characteristics of polishing- or glazing-finished monolithic zirconia surfaces after simulated toothbrushing. Eighty square-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were divided into two major groups based on the finishing methods—polished (P) and glazed (G). Next, specimens from the two major groups were categorized into four subgroups: stored in distilled water (DW, control); brushed with a fluoride-free conventional dentifrice (C); brushed with a fluoride dentifrice (F); and brushed with a whitening dentifrice (W). Overall, eight groups were created—PDW, PC, PF, PW, GDW, GC, GF, and GW (n = 10 each). Shade, translucency, surface gloss, surface roughness, crystalline phase, and superficial topography data were obtained. Repeated-measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison (all α = 0.05). The color differences (ΔE(00)) between pre- and posttreatment were 0.3158 (PDW), 0.7164 (PC), 0.7498 (PF), 0.8106 (PW), 0.1953 (GDW), 0.301 (GC), 0.3051 (GF), and 0.4846 (GW). A statistically significant difference was observed among the ΔE(00), surface gloss, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia. Thus, brushing with several dentifrices markedly affects the optical properties and surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia finished with polishing or glazing methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6480371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64803712019-04-29 Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hun Han, Jung-Suk Yeo, In-Sung Luke Yoon, Hyung-In Materials (Basel) Article This in vitro study investigated the impact of various dentifrices on the shade, translucency, gloss, and surface characteristics of polishing- or glazing-finished monolithic zirconia surfaces after simulated toothbrushing. Eighty square-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were divided into two major groups based on the finishing methods—polished (P) and glazed (G). Next, specimens from the two major groups were categorized into four subgroups: stored in distilled water (DW, control); brushed with a fluoride-free conventional dentifrice (C); brushed with a fluoride dentifrice (F); and brushed with a whitening dentifrice (W). Overall, eight groups were created—PDW, PC, PF, PW, GDW, GC, GF, and GW (n = 10 each). Shade, translucency, surface gloss, surface roughness, crystalline phase, and superficial topography data were obtained. Repeated-measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison (all α = 0.05). The color differences (ΔE(00)) between pre- and posttreatment were 0.3158 (PDW), 0.7164 (PC), 0.7498 (PF), 0.8106 (PW), 0.1953 (GDW), 0.301 (GC), 0.3051 (GF), and 0.4846 (GW). A statistically significant difference was observed among the ΔE(00), surface gloss, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia. Thus, brushing with several dentifrices markedly affects the optical properties and surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia finished with polishing or glazing methods. MDPI 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6480371/ /pubmed/30974750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071158 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lee, Jae-Hyun
Kim, Sung-Hun
Han, Jung-Suk
Yeo, In-Sung Luke
Yoon, Hyung-In
Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
title Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
title_full Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
title_fullStr Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
title_full_unstemmed Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
title_short Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
title_sort optical and surface properties of monolithic zirconia after simulated toothbrushing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974750
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071158
work_keys_str_mv AT leejaehyun opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing
AT kimsunghun opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing
AT hanjungsuk opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing
AT yeoinsungluke opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing
AT yoonhyungin opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing