Cargando…
Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing
This in vitro study investigated the impact of various dentifrices on the shade, translucency, gloss, and surface characteristics of polishing- or glazing-finished monolithic zirconia surfaces after simulated toothbrushing. Eighty square-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were divided into two maj...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071158 |
_version_ | 1783413557604384768 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hun Han, Jung-Suk Yeo, In-Sung Luke Yoon, Hyung-In |
author_facet | Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hun Han, Jung-Suk Yeo, In-Sung Luke Yoon, Hyung-In |
author_sort | Lee, Jae-Hyun |
collection | PubMed |
description | This in vitro study investigated the impact of various dentifrices on the shade, translucency, gloss, and surface characteristics of polishing- or glazing-finished monolithic zirconia surfaces after simulated toothbrushing. Eighty square-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were divided into two major groups based on the finishing methods—polished (P) and glazed (G). Next, specimens from the two major groups were categorized into four subgroups: stored in distilled water (DW, control); brushed with a fluoride-free conventional dentifrice (C); brushed with a fluoride dentifrice (F); and brushed with a whitening dentifrice (W). Overall, eight groups were created—PDW, PC, PF, PW, GDW, GC, GF, and GW (n = 10 each). Shade, translucency, surface gloss, surface roughness, crystalline phase, and superficial topography data were obtained. Repeated-measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison (all α = 0.05). The color differences (ΔE(00)) between pre- and posttreatment were 0.3158 (PDW), 0.7164 (PC), 0.7498 (PF), 0.8106 (PW), 0.1953 (GDW), 0.301 (GC), 0.3051 (GF), and 0.4846 (GW). A statistically significant difference was observed among the ΔE(00), surface gloss, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia. Thus, brushing with several dentifrices markedly affects the optical properties and surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia finished with polishing or glazing methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6480371 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64803712019-04-29 Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hun Han, Jung-Suk Yeo, In-Sung Luke Yoon, Hyung-In Materials (Basel) Article This in vitro study investigated the impact of various dentifrices on the shade, translucency, gloss, and surface characteristics of polishing- or glazing-finished monolithic zirconia surfaces after simulated toothbrushing. Eighty square-shaped monolithic zirconia specimens were divided into two major groups based on the finishing methods—polished (P) and glazed (G). Next, specimens from the two major groups were categorized into four subgroups: stored in distilled water (DW, control); brushed with a fluoride-free conventional dentifrice (C); brushed with a fluoride dentifrice (F); and brushed with a whitening dentifrice (W). Overall, eight groups were created—PDW, PC, PF, PW, GDW, GC, GF, and GW (n = 10 each). Shade, translucency, surface gloss, surface roughness, crystalline phase, and superficial topography data were obtained. Repeated-measures ANOVA and two-way ANOVA were used for intergroup comparison (all α = 0.05). The color differences (ΔE(00)) between pre- and posttreatment were 0.3158 (PDW), 0.7164 (PC), 0.7498 (PF), 0.8106 (PW), 0.1953 (GDW), 0.301 (GC), 0.3051 (GF), and 0.4846 (GW). A statistically significant difference was observed among the ΔE(00), surface gloss, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia. Thus, brushing with several dentifrices markedly affects the optical properties and surface characteristics of monolithic zirconia finished with polishing or glazing methods. MDPI 2019-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6480371/ /pubmed/30974750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071158 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Jae-Hyun Kim, Sung-Hun Han, Jung-Suk Yeo, In-Sung Luke Yoon, Hyung-In Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing |
title | Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing |
title_full | Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing |
title_fullStr | Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing |
title_full_unstemmed | Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing |
title_short | Optical and Surface Properties of Monolithic Zirconia after Simulated Toothbrushing |
title_sort | optical and surface properties of monolithic zirconia after simulated toothbrushing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480371/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30974750 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma12071158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejaehyun opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing AT kimsunghun opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing AT hanjungsuk opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing AT yeoinsungluke opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing AT yoonhyungin opticalandsurfacepropertiesofmonolithiczirconiaaftersimulatedtoothbrushing |