Cargando…
Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region
Residential green and blue spaces and their potential health benefits have received increasing attention in the context of environmental health inequalities, because an unequal social distribution of these resources may contribute to inequalities in health outcomes. This systematic review synthesise...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071216 |
_version_ | 1783413617969856512 |
---|---|
author | Schüle, Steffen Andreas Hilz, Lisa Karla Dreger, Stefanie Bolte, Gabriele |
author_facet | Schüle, Steffen Andreas Hilz, Lisa Karla Dreger, Stefanie Bolte, Gabriele |
author_sort | Schüle, Steffen Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Residential green and blue spaces and their potential health benefits have received increasing attention in the context of environmental health inequalities, because an unequal social distribution of these resources may contribute to inequalities in health outcomes. This systematic review synthesised evidence of environmental inequalities, focusing on availability and accessibility measures of green and blue spaces. Studies in the World Health Organisation (WHO) European Region published between 2010 and 2017 were considered for the review. In total, 14 studies were identified, where most of them (n = 12) analysed inequalities of green spaces. The majority had an ecological study design that mostly applied deprivation indices on the small area level, whereas cross-sectional studies on the individual level mostly applied single social measures. Ecological studies consistently showed that deprived areas had lower green space availability than more affluent areas, whereas mixed associations were found for single social dimensions in cross-sectional studies on the individual level. In order to gain more insights into how various social dimensions are linked to the distribution of environmental resources within the WHO European Region, more studies are needed that apply comparable methods and study designs for analysing social inequalities in environmental resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6480666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64806662019-04-29 Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region Schüle, Steffen Andreas Hilz, Lisa Karla Dreger, Stefanie Bolte, Gabriele Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Residential green and blue spaces and their potential health benefits have received increasing attention in the context of environmental health inequalities, because an unequal social distribution of these resources may contribute to inequalities in health outcomes. This systematic review synthesised evidence of environmental inequalities, focusing on availability and accessibility measures of green and blue spaces. Studies in the World Health Organisation (WHO) European Region published between 2010 and 2017 were considered for the review. In total, 14 studies were identified, where most of them (n = 12) analysed inequalities of green spaces. The majority had an ecological study design that mostly applied deprivation indices on the small area level, whereas cross-sectional studies on the individual level mostly applied single social measures. Ecological studies consistently showed that deprived areas had lower green space availability than more affluent areas, whereas mixed associations were found for single social dimensions in cross-sectional studies on the individual level. In order to gain more insights into how various social dimensions are linked to the distribution of environmental resources within the WHO European Region, more studies are needed that apply comparable methods and study designs for analysing social inequalities in environmental resources. MDPI 2019-04-04 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6480666/ /pubmed/30987381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071216 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Schüle, Steffen Andreas Hilz, Lisa Karla Dreger, Stefanie Bolte, Gabriele Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region |
title | Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region |
title_full | Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region |
title_fullStr | Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region |
title_short | Social Inequalities in Environmental Resources of Green and Blue Spaces: A Review of Evidence in the WHO European Region |
title_sort | social inequalities in environmental resources of green and blue spaces: a review of evidence in the who european region |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987381 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071216 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schulesteffenandreas socialinequalitiesinenvironmentalresourcesofgreenandbluespacesareviewofevidenceinthewhoeuropeanregion AT hilzlisakarla socialinequalitiesinenvironmentalresourcesofgreenandbluespacesareviewofevidenceinthewhoeuropeanregion AT dregerstefanie socialinequalitiesinenvironmentalresourcesofgreenandbluespacesareviewofevidenceinthewhoeuropeanregion AT boltegabriele socialinequalitiesinenvironmentalresourcesofgreenandbluespacesareviewofevidenceinthewhoeuropeanregion |