Cargando…

Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors

In this paper we analyze an experiment for the use of low-cost gas sensors intended to detect bacteria in wounds using a non-intrusive technique. Seven different genera/species of microbes tend to be present in most wound infections. Detection of these bacteria usually requires sample and laboratory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salinas Alvarez, Carlos, Sierra-Sosa, Daniel, Garcia-Zapirain, Begonya, Yoder-Himes, Deborah, Elmaghraby, Adel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30925832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19071523
_version_ 1783413621253996544
author Salinas Alvarez, Carlos
Sierra-Sosa, Daniel
Garcia-Zapirain, Begonya
Yoder-Himes, Deborah
Elmaghraby, Adel
author_facet Salinas Alvarez, Carlos
Sierra-Sosa, Daniel
Garcia-Zapirain, Begonya
Yoder-Himes, Deborah
Elmaghraby, Adel
author_sort Salinas Alvarez, Carlos
collection PubMed
description In this paper we analyze an experiment for the use of low-cost gas sensors intended to detect bacteria in wounds using a non-intrusive technique. Seven different genera/species of microbes tend to be present in most wound infections. Detection of these bacteria usually requires sample and laboratory testing which is costly, inconvenient and time-consuming. The validation processes for these sensors with nineteen types of microbes (1 Candida, 2 Enterococcus, 6 Staphylococcus, 1 Aeromonas, 1 Micrococcus, 2 E. coli and 6 Pseudomonas) are presented here, in which four sensors were evaluated: TGS-826 used for ammonia and amines, MQ-3 used for alcohol detection, MQ-135 for CO(2) and MQ-138 for acetone detection. Validation was undertaken by studying the behavior of the sensors at different distances and gas concentrations. Preliminary results with liquid cultures of 10(8) CFU/mL and solid cultures of 10(8) CFU/cm(2) of the 6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains revealed that the four gas sensors showed a response at a height of 5 mm. The ammonia detection response of the TGS-826 to Pseudomonas showed the highest responses for the experimental samples over the background signals, with a difference between the values of up to 60 units in the solid samples and the most consistent and constant values. This could suggest that this sensor is a good detector of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the recording made of its values could be indicative of the detection of this species. All the species revealed similar CO(2) emission and a high response rate with acetone for Micrococcus, Aeromonas and Staphylococcus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6480681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64806812019-04-29 Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors Salinas Alvarez, Carlos Sierra-Sosa, Daniel Garcia-Zapirain, Begonya Yoder-Himes, Deborah Elmaghraby, Adel Sensors (Basel) Article In this paper we analyze an experiment for the use of low-cost gas sensors intended to detect bacteria in wounds using a non-intrusive technique. Seven different genera/species of microbes tend to be present in most wound infections. Detection of these bacteria usually requires sample and laboratory testing which is costly, inconvenient and time-consuming. The validation processes for these sensors with nineteen types of microbes (1 Candida, 2 Enterococcus, 6 Staphylococcus, 1 Aeromonas, 1 Micrococcus, 2 E. coli and 6 Pseudomonas) are presented here, in which four sensors were evaluated: TGS-826 used for ammonia and amines, MQ-3 used for alcohol detection, MQ-135 for CO(2) and MQ-138 for acetone detection. Validation was undertaken by studying the behavior of the sensors at different distances and gas concentrations. Preliminary results with liquid cultures of 10(8) CFU/mL and solid cultures of 10(8) CFU/cm(2) of the 6 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains revealed that the four gas sensors showed a response at a height of 5 mm. The ammonia detection response of the TGS-826 to Pseudomonas showed the highest responses for the experimental samples over the background signals, with a difference between the values of up to 60 units in the solid samples and the most consistent and constant values. This could suggest that this sensor is a good detector of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the recording made of its values could be indicative of the detection of this species. All the species revealed similar CO(2) emission and a high response rate with acetone for Micrococcus, Aeromonas and Staphylococcus. MDPI 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6480681/ /pubmed/30925832 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19071523 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Salinas Alvarez, Carlos
Sierra-Sosa, Daniel
Garcia-Zapirain, Begonya
Yoder-Himes, Deborah
Elmaghraby, Adel
Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors
title Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors
title_full Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors
title_fullStr Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors
title_short Detection of Volatile Compounds Emitted by Bacteria in Wounds Using Gas Sensors
title_sort detection of volatile compounds emitted by bacteria in wounds using gas sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30925832
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s19071523
work_keys_str_mv AT salinasalvarezcarlos detectionofvolatilecompoundsemittedbybacteriainwoundsusinggassensors
AT sierrasosadaniel detectionofvolatilecompoundsemittedbybacteriainwoundsusinggassensors
AT garciazapirainbegonya detectionofvolatilecompoundsemittedbybacteriainwoundsusinggassensors
AT yoderhimesdeborah detectionofvolatilecompoundsemittedbybacteriainwoundsusinggassensors
AT elmaghrabyadel detectionofvolatilecompoundsemittedbybacteriainwoundsusinggassensors