Cargando…
The Great Debate: General Ability and Specific Abilities in the Prediction of Important Outcomes
The relative value of specific versus general cognitive abilities for the prediction of practical outcomes has been debated since the inception of modern intelligence theorizing and testing. This editorial introduces a special issue dedicated to exploring this ongoing “great debate”. It provides an...
Autores principales: | Kell, Harrison J., Lang, Jonas W. B. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030039 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Commenting on the “Great Debate”: General Abilities, Specific Abilities, and the Tools of the Trade
por: Beier, Margaret E., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Specific Abilities in the Workplace: More Important Than g?
por: Kell, Harrison J., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
A Tempest in A Ladle: The Debate about the Roles of General and Specific Abilities in Predicting Important Outcomes
por: Johnson, Wendy
Publicado: (2018) -
Ability Tests Measure Personality, Personality Tests Measure Ability: Disentangling Construct and Method in Evaluating the Relationship between Personality and Ability
por: Kyllonen, Patrick C., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Fluid Ability (Gf) and Complex Problem Solving (CPS)
por: Kyllonen, Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2017)