Cargando…

Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles

An article’s keywords are distinct because they represent what authors feel are the most important words in their papers. Combined, they can even shed light on which research topics in a field are popular (or less so). Here we conducted bibliometric keyword analyses of articles published in the jour...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pesta, Bryan, Fuerst, John, Kirkegaard, Emil O. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
_version_ 1783413643911626752
author Pesta, Bryan
Fuerst, John
Kirkegaard, Emil O. W.
author_facet Pesta, Bryan
Fuerst, John
Kirkegaard, Emil O. W.
author_sort Pesta, Bryan
collection PubMed
description An article’s keywords are distinct because they represent what authors feel are the most important words in their papers. Combined, they can even shed light on which research topics in a field are popular (or less so). Here we conducted bibliometric keyword analyses of articles published in the journal, Intelligence (2000–2016). The article set comprised 916 keyword-containing papers. First, we analyzed frequencies to determine which keywords were most/least popular. Second, we analyzed Web of Science (WOS) citation counts for the articles listing each keyword and we ran regression analyses to examine the effect of keyword categories on citation counts. Third, we looked at how citation counts varied across time. For the frequency analysis, “g factor”, “psychometrics/statistics”, and “education” emerged as the keywords with the highest counts. Conversely, the WOS citation analysis showed that papers with the keywords “spatial ability”, “factor analysis”, and “executive function” had the highest mean citation values. We offer tentative explanations for the discrepant results across frequencies and citations. The analysis across time revealed several keywords that increased (or decreased) in frequency over 17 years. We end by discussing how bibliometric keyword analysis can detect research trends in the field, both now and in the past.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6480778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64807782019-05-29 Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles Pesta, Bryan Fuerst, John Kirkegaard, Emil O. W. J Intell Article An article’s keywords are distinct because they represent what authors feel are the most important words in their papers. Combined, they can even shed light on which research topics in a field are popular (or less so). Here we conducted bibliometric keyword analyses of articles published in the journal, Intelligence (2000–2016). The article set comprised 916 keyword-containing papers. First, we analyzed frequencies to determine which keywords were most/least popular. Second, we analyzed Web of Science (WOS) citation counts for the articles listing each keyword and we ran regression analyses to examine the effect of keyword categories on citation counts. Third, we looked at how citation counts varied across time. For the frequency analysis, “g factor”, “psychometrics/statistics”, and “education” emerged as the keywords with the highest counts. Conversely, the WOS citation analysis showed that papers with the keywords “spatial ability”, “factor analysis”, and “executive function” had the highest mean citation values. We offer tentative explanations for the discrepant results across frequencies and citations. The analysis across time revealed several keywords that increased (or decreased) in frequency over 17 years. We end by discussing how bibliometric keyword analysis can detect research trends in the field, both now and in the past. MDPI 2018-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6480778/ /pubmed/31162473 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pesta, Bryan
Fuerst, John
Kirkegaard, Emil O. W.
Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles
title Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles
title_full Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles
title_fullStr Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles
title_full_unstemmed Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles
title_short Bibliometric Keyword Analysis across Seventeen Years (2000–2016) of Intelligence Articles
title_sort bibliometric keyword analysis across seventeen years (2000–2016) of intelligence articles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31162473
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6040046
work_keys_str_mv AT pestabryan bibliometrickeywordanalysisacrossseventeenyears20002016ofintelligencearticles
AT fuerstjohn bibliometrickeywordanalysisacrossseventeenyears20002016ofintelligencearticles
AT kirkegaardemilow bibliometrickeywordanalysisacrossseventeenyears20002016ofintelligencearticles