Cargando…

A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities

BACKGROUND: The management of pain by GPs for residents of aged care facilities (ACFs) is very common. AIM: To measure the prevalence and assess the management of pain in ACF residents, particularly those with dementia. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective review of ACF residents’ medical records w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Veal, Felicity, Williams, Mackenzie, Bereznicki, Luke, Cummings, Elizabeth, Winzenberg, Tania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101629
_version_ 1783413661283385344
author Veal, Felicity
Williams, Mackenzie
Bereznicki, Luke
Cummings, Elizabeth
Winzenberg, Tania
author_facet Veal, Felicity
Williams, Mackenzie
Bereznicki, Luke
Cummings, Elizabeth
Winzenberg, Tania
author_sort Veal, Felicity
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The management of pain by GPs for residents of aged care facilities (ACFs) is very common. AIM: To measure the prevalence and assess the management of pain in ACF residents, particularly those with dementia. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective review of ACF residents’ medical records was undertaken at five southern Tasmanian (Australia) ACFs. METHOD: Data extracted included results of the most recent assessment of pain and its management, frequency and treatment of pain incidents in the previous 7 days, demographics, and medical and medication history. Univariate analysis was used to identify variables associated with increased frequency of pain episodes. RESULTS: The final analysis included 477 residents. At least one episode of pain in the preceding 7 days was documented in 25.6% (n = 122) of residents' notes. Pain episodes were most commonly managed by analgesics (45.5%), massage (40.7%), and heatpacks (13.8%). Residents with dementia were not less likely to have pain identified during the past week (14% versus 20%; P = 0.09), but they were much less likely to have pain identified on their most recent pain assessment (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: GPs should carefully consider the suitability of using ‘as required’ analgesics. Furthermore, on admission to an ACF, GPs need to ensure a patient’s medical history includes all pain or potentially pain-causing conditions, to ensure that a resident’s pain assessment is complete. This is especially necessary for those with dementia, to ensure that staff remain vigilant about the possibility of the resident experiencing pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6480854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64808542019-05-02 A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities Veal, Felicity Williams, Mackenzie Bereznicki, Luke Cummings, Elizabeth Winzenberg, Tania BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: The management of pain by GPs for residents of aged care facilities (ACFs) is very common. AIM: To measure the prevalence and assess the management of pain in ACF residents, particularly those with dementia. DESIGN & SETTING: A retrospective review of ACF residents’ medical records was undertaken at five southern Tasmanian (Australia) ACFs. METHOD: Data extracted included results of the most recent assessment of pain and its management, frequency and treatment of pain incidents in the previous 7 days, demographics, and medical and medication history. Univariate analysis was used to identify variables associated with increased frequency of pain episodes. RESULTS: The final analysis included 477 residents. At least one episode of pain in the preceding 7 days was documented in 25.6% (n = 122) of residents' notes. Pain episodes were most commonly managed by analgesics (45.5%), massage (40.7%), and heatpacks (13.8%). Residents with dementia were not less likely to have pain identified during the past week (14% versus 20%; P = 0.09), but they were much less likely to have pain identified on their most recent pain assessment (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: GPs should carefully consider the suitability of using ‘as required’ analgesics. Furthermore, on admission to an ACF, GPs need to ensure a patient’s medical history includes all pain or potentially pain-causing conditions, to ensure that a resident’s pain assessment is complete. This is especially necessary for those with dementia, to ensure that staff remain vigilant about the possibility of the resident experiencing pain. Royal College of General Practitioners 2019-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6480854/ /pubmed/31049410 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101629 Text en Copyright © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Veal, Felicity
Williams, Mackenzie
Bereznicki, Luke
Cummings, Elizabeth
Winzenberg, Tania
A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
title A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
title_full A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
title_fullStr A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
title_short A retrospective review of pain management in Tasmanian residential aged care facilities
title_sort retrospective review of pain management in tasmanian residential aged care facilities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049410
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgpopen18X101629
work_keys_str_mv AT vealfelicity aretrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT williamsmackenzie aretrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT bereznickiluke aretrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT cummingselizabeth aretrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT winzenbergtania aretrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT vealfelicity retrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT williamsmackenzie retrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT bereznickiluke retrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT cummingselizabeth retrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities
AT winzenbergtania retrospectivereviewofpainmanagementintasmanianresidentialagedcarefacilities