Cargando…

How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown in a systematic review to have a statistically significant effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, when SM is compared to a sham intervention. The magnitude and duration of this effect is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Honoré, Margaux, Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte, Gagey, Olivier, Wedderkopp, Niels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0240-4
_version_ 1783413670022217728
author Honoré, Margaux
Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
Gagey, Olivier
Wedderkopp, Niels
author_facet Honoré, Margaux
Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
Gagey, Olivier
Wedderkopp, Niels
author_sort Honoré, Margaux
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown in a systematic review to have a statistically significant effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, when SM is compared to a sham intervention. The magnitude and duration of this effect is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect-size of SM in asymptomatic subjects and its duration. METHOD: This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous review. We sought to compare the effect-sizes in the various articles but had to calculate them ourselves, at different follow-up time measurements. Effect-sizes (Cohen’s d or Hedge’s g coefficient) were considered low, medium, and large, at the cut points of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively. RESULTS: Effect-sizes were reported in 6/8 studies, but all had calculated ‘within-group’ changes, not ‘between-group’ differences. Immediately after SM, only one study of four (with four measurements) had a statistically significant ‘medium’ effect size (d = 0.56; 95% CI: 00.4–1.08 to d = 0.70; 95% CI:0.18–1.22). Five minutes after SM, 4/5 studies found a statistically significant ‘medium to large’ effect-size (d = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.04–0.98 to d = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.28–2.20). Ten minutes after SM, two studies reported a ‘medium’ effect-size with statistical significance (d = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.11–1.05 to d = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.12–1.48). We drew no conclusions for the effect-sizes at one minute and thirty minutes after SM, as no between-group statistical difference was found. CONCLUSION: Authors need to revise their approach to ‘effect size’. Our calculations showed that the effect-size of SM on PPT may go from ‘medium’ to ‘large’ within the first five minutes but appears to diminish again within ten minutes. Research of this type should collect information for longer periods and compare results to other interventions to put results into perspective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0240-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6480891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64808912019-05-02 How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review Honoré, Margaux Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte Gagey, Olivier Wedderkopp, Niels Chiropr Man Therap Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation (SM) has been shown in a systematic review to have a statistically significant effect on the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in asymptomatic subjects, when SM is compared to a sham intervention. The magnitude and duration of this effect is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect-size of SM in asymptomatic subjects and its duration. METHOD: This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous review. We sought to compare the effect-sizes in the various articles but had to calculate them ourselves, at different follow-up time measurements. Effect-sizes (Cohen’s d or Hedge’s g coefficient) were considered low, medium, and large, at the cut points of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively. RESULTS: Effect-sizes were reported in 6/8 studies, but all had calculated ‘within-group’ changes, not ‘between-group’ differences. Immediately after SM, only one study of four (with four measurements) had a statistically significant ‘medium’ effect size (d = 0.56; 95% CI: 00.4–1.08 to d = 0.70; 95% CI:0.18–1.22). Five minutes after SM, 4/5 studies found a statistically significant ‘medium to large’ effect-size (d = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.04–0.98 to d = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.28–2.20). Ten minutes after SM, two studies reported a ‘medium’ effect-size with statistical significance (d = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.11–1.05 to d = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.12–1.48). We drew no conclusions for the effect-sizes at one minute and thirty minutes after SM, as no between-group statistical difference was found. CONCLUSION: Authors need to revise their approach to ‘effect size’. Our calculations showed that the effect-size of SM on PPT may go from ‘medium’ to ‘large’ within the first five minutes but appears to diminish again within ten minutes. Research of this type should collect information for longer periods and compare results to other interventions to put results into perspective. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12998-019-0240-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6480891/ /pubmed/31049195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0240-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Honoré, Margaux
Leboeuf-Yde, Charlotte
Gagey, Olivier
Wedderkopp, Niels
How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
title How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
title_full How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
title_fullStr How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
title_short How big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
title_sort how big is the effect of spinal manipulation on the pressure pain threshold and for how long does it last? – secondary analysis of data from a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6480891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31049195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-019-0240-4
work_keys_str_mv AT honoremargaux howbigistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdandforhowlongdoesitlastsecondaryanalysisofdatafromasystematicreview
AT leboeufydecharlotte howbigistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdandforhowlongdoesitlastsecondaryanalysisofdatafromasystematicreview
AT gageyolivier howbigistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdandforhowlongdoesitlastsecondaryanalysisofdatafromasystematicreview
AT wedderkoppniels howbigistheeffectofspinalmanipulationonthepressurepainthresholdandforhowlongdoesitlastsecondaryanalysisofdatafromasystematicreview