Cargando…
Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement
BACKGROUND: Frequent infant crying is associated with parental exhaustion, depression, or even infant hospitalization and shaken baby syndrome. Effective prompt soothing methods are lacking for infants under 6 months. We examined whether swaddling, sound, and movement evoked an immediate calming res...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6481793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214548 |
_version_ | 1783413791154765824 |
---|---|
author | Möller, Eline L. de Vente, Wieke Rodenburg, Roos |
author_facet | Möller, Eline L. de Vente, Wieke Rodenburg, Roos |
author_sort | Möller, Eline L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Frequent infant crying is associated with parental exhaustion, depression, or even infant hospitalization and shaken baby syndrome. Effective prompt soothing methods are lacking for infants under 6 months. We examined whether swaddling, sound, and movement evoked an immediate calming response (CR) when parents soothed their infants and using a smart crib, and whether infant age affected the CR. METHODS: Infants’ CR was assessed in a community sample of 69 infants (0–6 months) in a counterbalanced experiment with two conditions (parent, smart crib) each composed of three two-minute phases (baseline, supine, soothing). During baseline 1, parent and infant were sitting together; in supine 1, fussiness was elicited by putting the infant suddenly supine, followed by parental soothing (shushing and jiggling of the swaddled infant). Baseline 2, supine 2, and soothing by the crib followed. Fussiness was observed and infant heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were recorded. The CR was operationalized as decreased fussiness and HR, and increased HRV during soothing compared to lying supine. RESULTS: Infant fussiness and HR were lower in both soothing phases compared to the supine phases. Infant HRV tended to be higher during parental soothing than during supine, but did not significantly differ between mechanical soothing and supine. Younger infants responded with a stronger CR (decreased fussiness and increased HRV) to parental soothing, but not to mechanical soothing. For HR, infants’ CR was stronger in the crib than in the parent condition, whereas for HRV, infants’ CR was stronger in the parent condition. For fussiness, infants’ CR tended to be stronger in the parent condition. CONCLUSION: Parental and mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement promptly induced a CR in infants. This has important clinical implications for soothing fussy and crying infants. Future studies should investigate the effects of parental versus mechanical soothing in the home setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6481793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64817932019-05-07 Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement Möller, Eline L. de Vente, Wieke Rodenburg, Roos PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Frequent infant crying is associated with parental exhaustion, depression, or even infant hospitalization and shaken baby syndrome. Effective prompt soothing methods are lacking for infants under 6 months. We examined whether swaddling, sound, and movement evoked an immediate calming response (CR) when parents soothed their infants and using a smart crib, and whether infant age affected the CR. METHODS: Infants’ CR was assessed in a community sample of 69 infants (0–6 months) in a counterbalanced experiment with two conditions (parent, smart crib) each composed of three two-minute phases (baseline, supine, soothing). During baseline 1, parent and infant were sitting together; in supine 1, fussiness was elicited by putting the infant suddenly supine, followed by parental soothing (shushing and jiggling of the swaddled infant). Baseline 2, supine 2, and soothing by the crib followed. Fussiness was observed and infant heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) were recorded. The CR was operationalized as decreased fussiness and HR, and increased HRV during soothing compared to lying supine. RESULTS: Infant fussiness and HR were lower in both soothing phases compared to the supine phases. Infant HRV tended to be higher during parental soothing than during supine, but did not significantly differ between mechanical soothing and supine. Younger infants responded with a stronger CR (decreased fussiness and increased HRV) to parental soothing, but not to mechanical soothing. For HR, infants’ CR was stronger in the crib than in the parent condition, whereas for HRV, infants’ CR was stronger in the parent condition. For fussiness, infants’ CR tended to be stronger in the parent condition. CONCLUSION: Parental and mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement promptly induced a CR in infants. This has important clinical implications for soothing fussy and crying infants. Future studies should investigate the effects of parental versus mechanical soothing in the home setting. Public Library of Science 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6481793/ /pubmed/31017930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214548 Text en © 2019 Möller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Möller, Eline L. de Vente, Wieke Rodenburg, Roos Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
title | Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
title_full | Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
title_fullStr | Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
title_full_unstemmed | Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
title_short | Infant crying and the calming response: Parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
title_sort | infant crying and the calming response: parental versus mechanical soothing using swaddling, sound, and movement |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6481793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mollerelinel infantcryingandthecalmingresponseparentalversusmechanicalsoothingusingswaddlingsoundandmovement AT deventewieke infantcryingandthecalmingresponseparentalversusmechanicalsoothingusingswaddlingsoundandmovement AT rodenburgroos infantcryingandthecalmingresponseparentalversusmechanicalsoothingusingswaddlingsoundandmovement |