Cargando…
Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits
In peatland restoration we often lack an information whether re-established ecosystems are functionally similar to non-degraded ones. We re-analysed the long-term outcomes of restoration on vegetation and plant functional traits in 38 European fens restored by rewetting (18 sites) and topsoil remova...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6481837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215645 |
_version_ | 1783413799619919872 |
---|---|
author | Klimkowska, Agata Goldstein, Klara Wyszomirski, Tomasz Kozub, Łukasz Wilk, Mateusz Aggenbach, Camiel Bakker, Jan P. Belting, Heinrich Beltman, Boudewijn Blüml, Volker De Vries, Yzaak Geiger-Udod, Beate Grootjans, Ab P. Hedberg, Petter Jager, Henk J. Kerkhof, Dick Kollmann, Johannes Pawlikowski, Paweł Pleyl, Elisabeth Reinink, Warner Rydin, Hakan Schrautzer, Joachim Sliva, Jan Stańko, Robert Sundberg, Sebastian Timmermann, Tiemo Wołejko, Lesław van der Burg, Rob F. van der Hoek, Dick van Diggelen, Jose M. H. van Heerden, Adrie van Tweel, Loekie Vegelin, Kees Kotowski, Wiktor |
author_facet | Klimkowska, Agata Goldstein, Klara Wyszomirski, Tomasz Kozub, Łukasz Wilk, Mateusz Aggenbach, Camiel Bakker, Jan P. Belting, Heinrich Beltman, Boudewijn Blüml, Volker De Vries, Yzaak Geiger-Udod, Beate Grootjans, Ab P. Hedberg, Petter Jager, Henk J. Kerkhof, Dick Kollmann, Johannes Pawlikowski, Paweł Pleyl, Elisabeth Reinink, Warner Rydin, Hakan Schrautzer, Joachim Sliva, Jan Stańko, Robert Sundberg, Sebastian Timmermann, Tiemo Wołejko, Lesław van der Burg, Rob F. van der Hoek, Dick van Diggelen, Jose M. H. van Heerden, Adrie van Tweel, Loekie Vegelin, Kees Kotowski, Wiktor |
author_sort | Klimkowska, Agata |
collection | PubMed |
description | In peatland restoration we often lack an information whether re-established ecosystems are functionally similar to non-degraded ones. We re-analysed the long-term outcomes of restoration on vegetation and plant functional traits in 38 European fens restored by rewetting (18 sites) and topsoil removal (20 sites). We used traits related to nutrient acquisition strategies, competitiveness, seed traits, and used single- and multi-trait metrics. A separate set of vegetation records from near-natural fens with diverse plant communities was used to generate reference values to aid the comparisons. We found that both restoration methods enhanced the similarity of species composition to non-degraded systems but trait analysis revealed differences between the two approaches. Traits linked to nutrient acquisition strategies indicated that topsoil removal was more effective than rewetting. After topsoil removal competitive species in plant communities had decreased, while stress-tolerant species had increased. A substantial reduction in nutrient availability ruled out the effect of initial disturbance. An ability to survive and grow in anoxic conditions was enhanced after restoration, but the reference values were not achieved. Rewetting was more effective than topsoil removal in restricting variation in traits values permitted in re-developing vegetation. We found no indication of a shift towards reference in seed traits, which suggested that dispersal constraint and colonization deficit can be a widespread phenomena. Two functional diversity indices: functional richness and functional dispersion showed response to restoration and shifted values towards reference mires and away from the degraded systems. We concluded that targeting only one type of environmental stressor does not lead to a recovery of fens, as it provides insufficient level of stress to restore a functional ecosystem. In general, restoration efforts do not ensure the re-establishment and long-term persistence of fens. Restoration efforts result in recovery of fen ecosystems, confirmed with our functional trait analysis, although more rigid actions are needed for restoring fully functional mires, by achieving high and constant levels of anoxia and nutrient stresses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6481837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64818372019-05-07 Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits Klimkowska, Agata Goldstein, Klara Wyszomirski, Tomasz Kozub, Łukasz Wilk, Mateusz Aggenbach, Camiel Bakker, Jan P. Belting, Heinrich Beltman, Boudewijn Blüml, Volker De Vries, Yzaak Geiger-Udod, Beate Grootjans, Ab P. Hedberg, Petter Jager, Henk J. Kerkhof, Dick Kollmann, Johannes Pawlikowski, Paweł Pleyl, Elisabeth Reinink, Warner Rydin, Hakan Schrautzer, Joachim Sliva, Jan Stańko, Robert Sundberg, Sebastian Timmermann, Tiemo Wołejko, Lesław van der Burg, Rob F. van der Hoek, Dick van Diggelen, Jose M. H. van Heerden, Adrie van Tweel, Loekie Vegelin, Kees Kotowski, Wiktor PLoS One Research Article In peatland restoration we often lack an information whether re-established ecosystems are functionally similar to non-degraded ones. We re-analysed the long-term outcomes of restoration on vegetation and plant functional traits in 38 European fens restored by rewetting (18 sites) and topsoil removal (20 sites). We used traits related to nutrient acquisition strategies, competitiveness, seed traits, and used single- and multi-trait metrics. A separate set of vegetation records from near-natural fens with diverse plant communities was used to generate reference values to aid the comparisons. We found that both restoration methods enhanced the similarity of species composition to non-degraded systems but trait analysis revealed differences between the two approaches. Traits linked to nutrient acquisition strategies indicated that topsoil removal was more effective than rewetting. After topsoil removal competitive species in plant communities had decreased, while stress-tolerant species had increased. A substantial reduction in nutrient availability ruled out the effect of initial disturbance. An ability to survive and grow in anoxic conditions was enhanced after restoration, but the reference values were not achieved. Rewetting was more effective than topsoil removal in restricting variation in traits values permitted in re-developing vegetation. We found no indication of a shift towards reference in seed traits, which suggested that dispersal constraint and colonization deficit can be a widespread phenomena. Two functional diversity indices: functional richness and functional dispersion showed response to restoration and shifted values towards reference mires and away from the degraded systems. We concluded that targeting only one type of environmental stressor does not lead to a recovery of fens, as it provides insufficient level of stress to restore a functional ecosystem. In general, restoration efforts do not ensure the re-establishment and long-term persistence of fens. Restoration efforts result in recovery of fen ecosystems, confirmed with our functional trait analysis, although more rigid actions are needed for restoring fully functional mires, by achieving high and constant levels of anoxia and nutrient stresses. Public Library of Science 2019-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6481837/ /pubmed/31017976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215645 Text en © 2019 Klimkowska et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Klimkowska, Agata Goldstein, Klara Wyszomirski, Tomasz Kozub, Łukasz Wilk, Mateusz Aggenbach, Camiel Bakker, Jan P. Belting, Heinrich Beltman, Boudewijn Blüml, Volker De Vries, Yzaak Geiger-Udod, Beate Grootjans, Ab P. Hedberg, Petter Jager, Henk J. Kerkhof, Dick Kollmann, Johannes Pawlikowski, Paweł Pleyl, Elisabeth Reinink, Warner Rydin, Hakan Schrautzer, Joachim Sliva, Jan Stańko, Robert Sundberg, Sebastian Timmermann, Tiemo Wołejko, Lesław van der Burg, Rob F. van der Hoek, Dick van Diggelen, Jose M. H. van Heerden, Adrie van Tweel, Loekie Vegelin, Kees Kotowski, Wiktor Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
title | Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
title_full | Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
title_fullStr | Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
title_full_unstemmed | Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
title_short | Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
title_sort | are we restoring functional fens? – the outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6481837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31017976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215645 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klimkowskaagata arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT goldsteinklara arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT wyszomirskitomasz arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT kozubłukasz arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT wilkmateusz arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT aggenbachcamiel arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT bakkerjanp arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT beltingheinrich arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT beltmanboudewijn arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT blumlvolker arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT devriesyzaak arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT geigerudodbeate arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT grootjansabp arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT hedbergpetter arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT jagerhenkj arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT kerkhofdick arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT kollmannjohannes arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT pawlikowskipaweł arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT pleylelisabeth arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT reininkwarner arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT rydinhakan arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT schrautzerjoachim arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT slivajan arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT stankorobert arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT sundbergsebastian arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT timmermanntiemo arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT wołejkolesław arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT vanderburgrobf arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT vanderhoekdick arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT vandiggelenjosemh arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT vanheerdenadrie arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT vantweelloekie arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT vegelinkees arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits AT kotowskiwiktor arewerestoringfunctionalfenstheoutcomesofrestorationprojectsinfensreanalysedwithplantfunctionaltraits |