Cargando…

Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight

The Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) and the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial each randomized patients with multivessel disease to either stenting or bypass surgery. The ARTS showed no difference in mortality between the two strategies, other than in diabetic patients, who fared better wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatt, Deepak L, Topol, Eric J
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-260
_version_ 1782120148018135040
author Bhatt, Deepak L
Topol, Eric J
author_facet Bhatt, Deepak L
Topol, Eric J
author_sort Bhatt, Deepak L
collection PubMed
description The Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) and the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial each randomized patients with multivessel disease to either stenting or bypass surgery. The ARTS showed no difference in mortality between the two strategies, other than in diabetic patients, who fared better with surgery. The SoS trial demonstrated increased mortality in the stent arm, a difference that was not attributable to diabetes. Both trials found that the rates of repeat revascularization were lower with surgery, although the rate with stenting was much lower than had been seen in previous trials of angioplasty. Use of antiplatelet therapy such as intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, especially with their pronounced effects in diabetics and in those with multivessel disease, could potentially equalize the playing field or perhaps even tip the balance in favor of percutaneous intervention.
format Text
id pubmed-64821
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-648212002-01-25 Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight Bhatt, Deepak L Topol, Eric J Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med Commentary The Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS) and the Stent or Surgery (SoS) trial each randomized patients with multivessel disease to either stenting or bypass surgery. The ARTS showed no difference in mortality between the two strategies, other than in diabetic patients, who fared better with surgery. The SoS trial demonstrated increased mortality in the stent arm, a difference that was not attributable to diabetes. Both trials found that the rates of repeat revascularization were lower with surgery, although the rate with stenting was much lower than had been seen in previous trials of angioplasty. Use of antiplatelet therapy such as intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, especially with their pronounced effects in diabetics and in those with multivessel disease, could potentially equalize the playing field or perhaps even tip the balance in favor of percutaneous intervention. BioMed Central 2001 2001-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC64821/ /pubmed/11806809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-260 Text en Copyright © 2001 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Bhatt, Deepak L
Topol, Eric J
Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight
title Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight
title_full Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight
title_fullStr Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight
title_full_unstemmed Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight
title_short Debate: PCI or CABG for multivessel disease? Viewpoint: No clear winner in an unfair fight
title_sort debate: pci or cabg for multivessel disease? viewpoint: no clear winner in an unfair fight
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC64821/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cvm-2-6-260
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattdeepakl debatepciorcabgformultivesseldiseaseviewpointnoclearwinnerinanunfairfight
AT topolericj debatepciorcabgformultivesseldiseaseviewpointnoclearwinnerinanunfairfight